The SEO Revolution
As everyone with eyes knows, Kevin is the Big Guy at Lexblog, home of the Lexblog family of Lexblogs. His goal is to put a blawg in every lawyer's hands, and if they all happen to be created by Lexblog, like Iowa Dirt Lawyer (his latest and my favorite new blawg name), the better. But there is a line.
I'm getting sick of lawyers leaving comments here under the name 'DC Divorce Lawyer' or 'Injury Lawyer.' Is that what your kids call you? Is that how you get introduced when speaking to a group? You mean you use your real name. Amazing.
Why not have the decency to use your name when participating in conversations on my blog and other blogs around the net? Blogs really are conversations.
Even if you don't care whether you look like an idiot, lawyers publishing blogs aren't blogging for the benefit of sleazy lawyers looking for a free way to get SEO for their blog or website. It may sound unbelievable, but lawyers are blogging to provide value to a growing Internet discussion, not for SEO to get traffic to a website.
Kevin and I have had a number of discussions about the future of the blawgosphere, and how what we do now impacts on how bright, or dull, the future looks. We disagree about a couple of things. But we agree about one very important thing. The vitality of the blawgosphere depends upon lawyers using it to offer substantive content. Put another way, if the blawgosphere exists to serve as a big, ugly, nasty infomercial, no one will come. No one should come.

When someone comes to Kevin for a Lexblog, he implores them to use this tool carefully. It is not, he tells them, a bludgeon to beat potential clients over the head. It is a scalpel, they are told, with which to surgically dissect the legal world in fascinating ways by providing interesting, informative and entertaining reading. Write things that people want to read is the mantra of Lexblog, and you will attract readers. Write crap, or worse still, write about how wonderful you are, and you will be very lonely.
Kevin markets Lexblog to lawyers who want to market in the blawgosphere. Yes, it leaves a sour taste in my mouth. But I'm not so foolish as to think that my aversion to marketing will change lawyers' motivations, and I am not against lawyers having clients and making a living, even though I don't think this is the right way to go about it. Nonetheless, I admire Kevin's position that substance is the right path. After all, had Hemingway written novels for no other reason than to get pocket change for his next drink, would his stories be less macho? Of course not.
Of all the horrors perpetrated on and by lawyers seeking to elevate their online presence, aside from the mass emails seeking link exchanges and faculty positions at Solo Practice University, the most nefarious is the commenter who seeks SEO supremacy. And of these, the lowest is the one who pays the legal marketer to have some starving third-world child spam comments on their behalf. This is the true nadir of the blawgosphere.
It outrages Kevin. It outrages me. It should outrage you as well. But do you see it? Do you get it?
Lawyers can be a funny breed of human being. Many possess agile minds, which allow them to perform their functions well in the face of adversity. This same skill, however, also allows them to construct arguments that rationalize their own behaviors, deny that they are doing what they claim to despise in others. Sometimes the dissonance is real, whether by intent or distinguishing act, and sometimes it's just a lot of hooey.
Indeed, the irony is made plain in the comments to Kevin's post, where one commenter so fundamentally missed the point that he posted under the name of some blog rather than a real name, as did all others. Yet, this comment was directed at distinguishing evil blawgers who market shamelessly from legitimate blawgers who market shamelessly. One can only assume that this blogger places himself in the "good" category, evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
Now that the Master of the Blawgosphere has called for Revolution, I echo (or retweet if this was tweeterville) his cry. Join us. Spread the word. Save the blawgosphere. And I join Grant Griffith in saying, thanks Kevin for taking the lead.










A typical Greenberg post generates 17 comments in a morning. A post involving me - no comments till mine. Looks like you may have been overinflating my status labeling me as 'Master of the Internet.'
Seriously, let's keep after lawyers who are spamming the Internet in the name of SEO. One thing the net does give us is the ability to embarrass the guys. They may not feel embarrassed as they don't know they look like idiots.
Reply to this
Did you mean "Greenfield", or is there some other guy named Greenberg I ought to be looking out for? I knew I was just small potatoes to a Master of the Internet like O'Keefe (say, is that an Irish name?), but I hoped he would at least remember my name.
Reply to this
Reuben Greenberg? I didn't know he blogs, but, hey . . .
Reply to this
Other possibilities?
Judge Brad Greenberg?
Rabbi Greenberg?
Reply to this
You are fortunate that a man of my importance even notices that a fly like you exists, whatever your name is.
[Edit Note: Kevin left a different comment, but used a profane word, forcing me to change his comment somewhat in order to eliminate the foul language while retaining the original flavor of the comment.]
Reply to this
First, thanks for the compliment. I am getting mixed reviews. For the record, Kevin didn't like it. This SEO game is new to me - it obviously raises tempers (I'm familiar with the Irish temper). The fine line between good and bad marketing? I'm not sure I have that figured out yet.
Reply to this
Welcome Pat. Don't worry about Kevin. His idea of naming is a bit formulaic (this is one of the areas where we differ). Anybody who's got the good sense to pick a great name like Iowa Dirt Lawyer will figure the marketing thing out.
Reply to this
Hey, Greenie, may I get back to your topic in this post? I've been insisting all year that Commentors use a human-like appellation in the Name field. I delete "Names" that are generic marketing taglines or the title of a weblog. At times, I go to the commentor's weblog and find a name to use. At other times, when the comment has no substance or misses the point, or seems to have been inserted by a Spam SEO Specialist, I merely delete it as spam. I'm glad to have Kevin join this crusade.
Reply to this
Greenie? Is this make fun of my name day and no one told me?
I agree with you completely, which is why I found it so sadly ironic to have a lawyer trying to spin his pathetic use of Kevin's post to enhance his own SEO needs. Say, this is the first time I can recall where you and Kevin are on the same team. Perhaps he's come around to realizing that you have been right all along. Yes, I think that's so.
Reply to this
Oh, Gadfly, you are such a little trouble-maker. Kevin and I were on the same team back in his PrairieLaw Days.
Reply to this