Al Franken Can't Take a Joke
Popular myth suggests that comedians, who use biting humor to critically assess and reveal our foibles, would make darn good public officials. Al Franken, the man of a thousand recounts, proves the myth has legs.
At a Senate hearing on an amendment to preclude the government from hiring contractors who impose mandatory binding arbitration on their employees on issues such as sexual assault, Franken stared down a lawyer for Halliburton/KKR, who had taken the position that it was done for the good of the employees to provide them with an expedited means of addressing their grievances, suggesting that employees who were raped did better with private arbitration than they would in court.
Though not a lawyer, Senator Franken has the opportunity to examine witnesses at the hearing, and he makes surprisingly good use of his authority.
At a Senate hearing on an amendment to preclude the government from hiring contractors who impose mandatory binding arbitration on their employees on issues such as sexual assault, Franken stared down a lawyer for Halliburton/KKR, who had taken the position that it was done for the good of the employees to provide them with an expedited means of addressing their grievances, suggesting that employees who were raped did better with private arbitration than they would in court.
Though not a lawyer, Senator Franken has the opportunity to examine witnesses at the hearing, and he makes surprisingly good use of his authority.










I'm not, generally, a fan of Al Franken. I am, though, unabashedly a fan of how he's conducted himself in this, and not just because he's right on the issue, although that doesn't hurt any.
Reply to this
Disclosure: I represent Oregon National Guard soldiers on injury claims against KBR for toxic exposures to sodium dichromate while they protected KBR workers in So. Iraq. So it's fair to say I have a point of view.
Mandatory arbitration is one of the great outrages of the civil justice system. There are several other features of mandatory arbitration that make it a fun house hall of mirrors. Usually, costs are exorbitant as compared to filing a civil case in court. Often remedies are stripped (attorney fees, emotional distress damages, punitive damages). The topper is that at least one institutional providers (NAF) apparently has actual undisclosed interests on cases it arbitrates. Other providers (AAA and JAMS) may well have institutional biases in servicing their subscriber clients. It's a fake system of justice that Sen. Franken is taking on.
Amazing how well the good Senator from Minnesota gets it. Nice to know that he has the chops along with his commitment to social and economic justice issues
Reply to this
Al Franken proved his mettle by taking on the outrageous and demonstrably immoral Halliburton/KBR, the junk yard dog of Bush/Cheney. That promises a career for Senator Franken that will support an idea that the spirit of the Constitution implies and must be revived, that of justice for all.
Reply to this