For Ever and Ever

I was sold on the idea after reading Dan Solove’s book, The Future of Reputation.  For reasons unknown, the New York Times has finally caught up with its story in the Sunday Magazine by lawprof Jeffrey Rosen.  The problems are well known.

1.  People post the most mind-numblingly stupid revealing and personal stuff about themselves.
2.  People post things that seem funny at the time but will cause them enormous grief and problems later.
3.  People post things that are easily misunderstood by readers who are not within the intended audience.
4.  People post things in haste or anger, but can’t take them back.

And then there are the problems people cause others.  Some post critically about others.  Sometimes it’s well deserved.  Other times it’s not.  Sometimes it’s completely false.  Sometimes it’s completely true.

One of the most problematic situations is when someone posts information about a friend that contains information that will haunt another person forever.  You can be circumspect in your own posting, but have no control over the propriety of what others post about you.

“Sue Smith was so drunk and high on coke last night that she let all seven of those disgusting guys have their way with her in front of everyone.  LOL!”

Yeah, that’s a hoot.  Unless Sue Smith’s employer happens to run across it as she’s up for consideration for a new job, promotion, appointment.  Sue would have done better to remain in control, but then again, is it necessary that this be her legacy?

Rosen, like Solove before him, offers a number of solutions to the problem of perpetual online reputation.  The problem is that none of them come without a price, primarily in the form of free speech.  Whether the trade-off is worth it largely depends on where one’s reputation falls along the spectrum.  If there are some nasty things out there about you, chances are good that you’re all in favor of declaring “reputation bankruptcy” and clearing the cache, so to speak, of your past.  But then, it will also breed scoundrels by eliminating those aspects of their history that remain critical, such as disbarment.

To those people, and by “those people” I particularly refer to the young and foolish who appear clueless as to why today’s fun and cool adventures won’t be received nearly as well twenty years later, who post about themselves without the slightest degree of thought for their reputation, grow up.  You can be fun, carefree and cool without being utterly foolish.  Ask yourself, will this be nearly as cool when it’s read by my future employer, client or spouse?  If not, don’t do it.

Far harder is dealing with dear friends who mindlessly post the harmful, stupid stuff that wreaks havoc with another person’s life.  They mean no harm.  Oops. Sorry.  Yeah, well, that doesn’t do much good, now does it?

Think.  If you want to screw up your own life, reputation and future, at least you’re the only who will suffer.  Don’t screw with someone else’s life out of stupidity and carelessness.  Don’t do grievous harm to another because it seemed like a funny thing to do at the time.  Read what you are about to publish as if you were someone researching their life twenty years later, and consider that info posted by friends can frequently be considered one of the most credible sources of information about a person.  In other words, you are stabbing your dear friend in the heart and can’t be bothered to think enough of it to restrain yourself.

I’ve seen this happen, and had it happen.  I’ve had very smart people post some very stupid things about me.  It’s cost me friendships when the poster doesn’t get why I’m so angry about their off-hand joke.  But their lack of comprehension isn’t reason enough for me to be burdened by their moment of cluelessness forever.

The price for the solutions to the dilemma of reputation is higher than I care to pay.  There are some negative things about me floating around the internet, and some horrifically awful false statements made for the purpose of trying to do me harm.  I don’t like them, but I would still prefer that we not engage in a series of legal responses that will infringe on free communication.  My shoulders are pretty broad.

The best solution, however, is also the easiest and cheapest.  Stop posting stupid and harmful crap for fun.  Think before you hit “enter”.  Both for yourself and others, but especially for others as they don’t deserve to suffer the consequence of your brain fart. 

Yes, a few funny things will be lost to the ages,  That’s a price I can live with.


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “For Ever and Ever

  1. JKB

    Pretty funny anyone thinks you can clean up your reputation on the internet when we can’t even clear up reputation problems in official records. You post about the guy who had his name used by a sex offender is one example.

    Another is a friend had a small misdemeanor legal problem but then applied to national employer before the expungement of his record took effect. Employer declines to extend and offer. Here 18 months later, long after his record was expunged, he gets an offer from another location of the national employer only to have it rescinded because his criminal record is still in their database and apparently always will be in their applicant database.

    If you can’t clean that up, how can you clean up that something you voluntarily post on a social networking site.

  2. Jaimie Field

    Thanks for the post Scott.

    This should be mandatory reading for all of the teens out there. I have repeatedly messaged my 19 year old nephew to explain to him that the drunken frat pictures are liable to haunt him forever.

    Unfortunately, this only paints me as the uncool aunt . . .

    Sigh….

  3. Gritsforbreakfast

    “I’ve had very smart people post some very stupid things about me”

    With respect, you’re a very smart person who has occasionally posted stupid things about others, particularly sweeping generalizations about young people based on snippets from blog posts, blasting anyone who thinks it’s the wrong approach telling them this is not the “Happysphere.” I largely agree with the point of this post, but perhaps you’re not the best messenger?

    Also, how does the advice to “Think before you hit ‘enter'” jibe with the claim that you dash off every post in 10 minutes with no research or editing? It seems like both things can’t be happening.

  4. SHG

    As to your first point, it reflects your disagreeing with things I’ve written, and that’s fine, but irrelevant to this post. You are certainly free to find my views as to the Happysphere completely, totally wrong, but I don’t or I wouldn’t have expressed them.  So your premise is fatally flawed.  You may not see me as the best messenger, but then I’m not seeking your approval.  If you agree with this post, and think you might be a better messenger, by all means add your voice.  If not, so what?  Do you think my purpose in life is to write things that Scott Henson agrees with?

    As for your second point, you’ve grossly misunderstood what I’ve said.  At no time did I say that I “dash off every post in 10 minutes with no research or editing.”  That’s not the case.  I’ve never suggested anything of the sort, and why you would fabricate something like that is beyond comprehension.  And before you respond, no, just because you’ve chosen to raise something irrelevant to the post doesn’t mean that I need to engage in another discussion about this. 

Comments are closed.