As is the SJ end of year tradition, nominations are open for the most prestigious award in all of the criminal law blawgosphere, the 7th Annual Jdog Prize for the best blawg post in criminal law.
The prize recognizes and honors the effort and thoughtfulness of criminal law blawgers with our annual Best Criminal Law Blawg Post, which has been dedicated to the memory of our dear friend, Joel Rosenberg.
Unlike the other Beauty Pageants in the blawgosphere, the idea here is to provide a platform to revisit the excellent work done over the past year. Past winners of the JDog prize are luminaries of the blawgosphere, Ohio’s Jeff Gamso, Connecticut’s Gideon Strumpet, Texas’ Mark Bennett, Arizona’s Matt Brown, Fishtown’s Leo Mulvihill and Texas’ Murray Newman.
Here’s the deal:
- Anybody can nominate a post for the honor, including their own. SJ posts are off limits. You can nominate them anonymously, with great fanfare, just by name or with a detailed explanation of why you think a post is the best. It can be a post from a criminal defense lawyer, a prosecutor or a non-lawyer, provided its subject is criminal law. It can even be a post by a lawprof. You can nominate up to five posts.
- Nominations can only be made in the comments here. No emails, phone calls, text messages, fruit baskets or lovely cards with deeply personal messages.
- For this contest, and for this contest only, I will allow links to be included in comments to the posts (not the blawgs, but the actual posts) nominated. Spam links will be treated harshly.
- This is a chance to think back over the past year and give everyone some great posts to read, to ponder, to discuss and maybe even change some minds.
I invite anyone and everyone to offer the best the blawgosphere has in criminal law. Spread the word, and let others know that this is their opportunity to show their stuff, get a backlink, and let the rest of the blawgosphere know what they’re doing. If nothing else, this is an opportunity for you to let others know you exist, you’re writing about criminal law, and maybe catch some eyeballs. If your stuff is good, then people will read you. Go for it.
Nothing here at Simple Justice is eligible, so don’t waste time with it.
The winner will be announced on January 2nd (normally, it’s New Year’s Day, but since I’ll be out of the country that day, I’m pushing it over to the second) 1st (had my dates wrong, and I’m back). I’m opening nominations a few days earlier this year since I’ll be away for a period and want to make sure every post nominated gets the attention it deserves.
Judging will be entirely on my shoulders, and I will be as arbitrary and capricious as I please, so there’s no complaining about the choice. That said, I will do my best to select the blawg post that best reflects our finest work, our highest tradition, our deepest thoughts and our best purpose in putting words on a computer screen. For anyone who doesn’t trust me to be fair, find a better offer elsewhere.
One important point: It’s up to you, the readers of criminal law blawg posts, to show me that you are willing to put in the effort to give a damn about the blawgosphere by nominating the best posts. If you can’t be bothered, then I can’t be bothered. You enjoy reading some great stuff about criminal law, so this is the opportunity to let the writers know. And if it’s too much effort to nominate anyone, then it tells me that we’re wasting our time here. See how that works?
Finally, to address the perpetual issue, efforts to bribe me with barbecue or baked goods will not assure a win. However, it can’t hurt and is defintely worth a try.
Maybe a “seal” for Top 100 Silliest Comments could be given.
Oh, and stick to your day job, given the market’s performance since your “short” call.
Find something worth nominating.
http://www.andrewcase.com/columns/2015/9/17/some-thoughts-on-the-james-blake-incident
Gideon Strumpet – I’m voting!
Blawg post, not Strumpet.
Wow, there are a lot of posts to go through. First shout-out goes to Jeff Gamso:
Who’ll See Past the Monster? It Depends
Yay! The annual circle jerk is on! Where is it this year? Motel 6 off the highway in Secaucus?
There are few things I enjoy more than people, who scream about how they’re never coming back to SJ, coming back because they are filled with obsessive hate. It’s really quite flattering.
SHG,
I nominate Greg Prickett for two posts that should be treated as one and read together. In order, they are:
DRIVING TO THE SOUND OF GUNFIRE, Fault Lines (Dec 11, 2015) (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/driving-to-the-sound-of-gunfire/5379)
and THE EXECUTION OF NICHOLAS ROBERTSON, Fault Lines (Dec 15, 2015) (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/when-you-cant-run-you-crawl-and-when-you-cant-crawl/5454).
All the best.
RGK
This guy!
He ain’t no Ken Doll he’s the real thing!
I never really thought it was true what some said about former and even current public defenders…
But it really is true! Weebles may wobble but they never fall down!!!
Straight from lions den.
Meet the unequivocal rookie of the year and in my opinion the league MVP this season for not only showing up but bringing the heat.
Right on time and right down the middle… I nominate the, hopefully to be Honorable one day if he throws his hat in for the ring for the bench, the one, THE ONLY…..
Mr. Ken Womble!!!!!!!!!
An Open Letter To NYPD Union President Pat Lynch
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/an-open-letter-to-nypd-union-president-pat-lynch/3127
Failure At The Nassau County Legal Aid Society, Part 1
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/failure-at-the-nassau-county-legal-aid-society-part-1/4792
Failure At The Nassau County Legal Aid Society, Part 2
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/failure-at-the-nassau-county-legal-aid-society-part-2/4847
Search Warrants: When Is The Last Time A Judge Said No?
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/search-warrants-when-is-the-last-time-a-judge-said-no-72915713/2157
If Ken starts painting the corners, just for fun next season, and stops listing to his overly conservitive pitching manager, he is gonna be among the all time greats!
*Just click on The Man’s name over there at the uptown pinstripes roster roll. And you all just wait…Because when Ken stops letting his pitching coach hold him back and filling his head with all the trials and tribulations of the blaw-o-sphere and Ken starts sitting next to Jeff “bring it on” Gamso, when he is visiting the dugout, Gamso is gonna whisper in his ear about the secrets to comming up with the headline for a post, which will set “The Ken” free, and the rest will be history!
I second all of these Womble posts. I’d also add to the list. Ken has a keen way of unmasking the insanity built into the system in easily digestible portions.
Prosecutors Care About Winning, Not People (anything starting with a quote from Justice Jackson has a leg up, but this is really good).
and
New York Times Goes Full Jekyll & Hyde On Bail Reform
I have to agree with Barleycorn . Ken Womble.
The Nassau County series was outstanding.
Rights Are Bundled, Not A La Carte, by Ken White at Mimesis Law/Fault Lines.
Okay, my first nomination goes to Matt Brown, for this post:
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/kevin-melton-a-pain-in-everyones-ass-for-no-reason/4992
Next, Gamso, for this one:
http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.de/2015/01/retards-killing-intellectually-disabled.html?m=1
Greg Prickett:
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/to-understand-body-cameras-imagine-a-world-without-them/4272
I agree with John Barleycorn, particularly,
An Open Letter To NYPD Union President Pat Lynch
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/an-open-letter-to-nypd-union-president-pat-lynch/3127
Judging will be entirely on my shoulders, and I will be as arbitrary and capricious………
Sounds like a lot of courts I have attended; at least you had the good grace to restate the rules up front.
I’ve just started auditing this blog so i think the nominees will be an excellent ‘catch up’ series for me. Will you publish them all in a list?
These comments are the list. Read away, and feel free to nominate if you’re so inclined.
Just because I don’t want to get a taste of something I won’t ever get again, I’m not going to link them, but Ken White’s Lawsplainers are great reads.
If you want to nominate a post, you have to put a link in a comment. Editorials don’t suffice.
Fine, but if I start trying to link shit all over the place, I just want you to know I learned it from watching you…
https://popehat.com/2015/11/05/lawsplainer-how-the-sixth-circuit-stood-up-to-hecklers-and-cops/
Another from Popehat. This post started a shift in the way I view criminal law. It also led me here and into the wider blogosphere. Something for which I am very grateful.
“It’s not unjust that Darren Wilson gets the benefit of the doubt. It’s unjust that nearly everyone else doesn’t.”
https://popehat.com/2015/03/04/darren-wilson-and-the-benefit-of-doubt/
Nomination for Ken Womble’s expose on the Nassau County Legal Aid system at Fault Lines.
Matt Brown tells this sadly ordinary story of a client facing charges from a police sting :
http://brownandlittlelaw.com/2015/03/25/the-story-of-a-real-victim/
Norm DeGuerre tries a trick to help a client make a decision :
http://chasingtruthcatchinghell.com/2015/05/18/grandma-should-i-plea-a-largely-true-story/
If burning the whole system to the ground is your idea of a valid defense strategy, Matt Haiduk would probably agree :
http://matthaiduk.com/2015/03/25/setting-every-damn-case-for-trial-the-beginning-of-the-end-of-my-reign-of-pain-as-a-public-defender/
And just to show I’m not a hater, here’s a prosecutor nominee, although this post is about quitting his job… :
http://prosecutorsdiscretion.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-new-journey.html
And while Scott is allowing links in the blog, let me see if I can sneak in a link to help out all you lawyers trying to solve the comment math problems:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2%2Bx%3D6
http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.com/2015/05/resuscitating-dying.html
http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2015/09/2015-73-opportunist-dan-patrick-and-the-goforth-murder/
There were a number of excellent posts concerning overcriminalization (regrettably, directly proportional to the efforts to overcriminalize, but I digress); I thought several critiques of the misguided “revenge porn” initiatives were all worthy of nomination: Mark Bennett, for his excellent fisking of the model statute (http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2015/01/2015-14-fking-danielle-citron/) and subsequent follow-up on the proponents’ confidentiality arguments (http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2015/05/2015-59-revenge-porn-statutes-and-confidentiality/), and Greg Prickett, for his post noting that not all problems (like revenge porn) should be dealt with in a criminal law context (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/revenge-porn-when-a-problem-is-not-a-crime/2187).
Concerning the Second Amendment, I thought a couple of recent posts from Ken White (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/rights-are-bundled-not-a-la-carte/5328) and Josh Kendrick (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/the-danger-of-common-sense-restrictions-on-constitutional-rights/5373) were worthy of nomination, and entirely in keeping with JDog’s fervent interest in Second Amendment law.
I thought one of the more troubling incidents in a year filled with police killings of unarmed people was the one where a man rightly told the police to come back with a warrant if they wanted to enter his dwelling, and was subsequently killed for doing so. Kendrick’s post (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/james-livingston-killed-for-knowing-his-rights/4857) on the incident was one of the best ones. An earlier Prickett post (http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/cooperate-with-the-police-or-else/4628) ably highlighted the “us v. them” mentality which often results in (and for police and their apologists justifies) such outcomes.
A helpful reminder, from Radley Balko, in long form:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/01/22/the-supreme-courts-massive-blind-spot/
And the same, from RGK, in short form:
http://wednesdaywiththedecentlyprofane.me/2015/01/27/bradley-balko-and-the-inexperience-of-the-justices-when-it-comes-to-criminal-law/
For straight up “Holy crap that’s a great idea” I’d have to nominate Rick Horowitz’s “Insuring that All Lives Matter” (https://rhdefense.com/2015/06/11/insuring-that-all-lives-matter)
A bit of homerism for my stomping ground Fault Lines, but I want to add a few to the mix.
Andrew Fleischman dropped a fantastic piece about the sanctity of the home in Virginia. http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/in-virginia-refusing-to-let-police-into-your-home-gives-them-authority-to-enter/3432
And I (like many, many others) just love me some Greg Prickett. I will second the nomination for his recent piece THE EXECUTION OF NICHOLAS ROBERTSON* http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/when-you-cant-run-you-crawl-and-when-you-cant-crawl/5454 (my favorite of his so far).
And finally, not sure how criminal blawgospherey this one is, but I would be remiss if I did not give a shout out to the Good Judge, RGK. Some things are more important than others. http://wednesdaywiththedecentlyprofane.me/2015/07/09/some-things-are-more-important-than-others-2/
The final post of RGK at the late ‘Hercules and the Umpire’.
http://wednesdaywiththedecentlyprofane.me/2015/07/09/some-things-are-more-important-than-others-2/
Because it is, after all, about actual people and it has real consequences. That, and I am horribly sentimental.
I imagine I’ll be back with one or two more, but Mirriam Seddiq got the year off with a winner explaining something about the real world that far too many don’t get, won’t get, wouldn’t even consider getting. “So glad you decided to join us.”
http://www.notguiltynoway.com/2015/01/1308.html
Andrew Fleishman:
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/the-high-price-of-being-a-free-lawyer/4725
Ken Womble:
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/ken-womble-fighting-the-good-fight/4315
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/prosecutors-care-about-winning-not-people/3512
This, because I think someone has to call out the systemic failures. Ken Womble, the sad state of one particular public defender situation, with the sad realization that many, many public defenders don’t work the way they should.
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/failure-at-the-nassau-county-legal-aid-society-part-1/4792
Some posts were great at outlining the problems:
Why Don’t Prosecutors Want Jurors to Know the Sentence?
and
Failure At The Nassau County Legal Aid Society, Part 1
And then there were those offering solutions:
When It Comes To Open Records of Cop Killings, Be Like Texas
and
Criminal Law 2.0
(while not quite a crim law blog post, it was serialized by Eugene Volokh, so I’m including it)
Also tossing in Rights Are Bundled, Not A La Carte