Short Take: Shaken Baby, 35 Years Later

It’s long been clear that what was once called “Shaken Baby Syndrome,” later renamed “Abusive Head Trauma” to pretend it’s not the same old sham, was nothing more than a phony diagnosis wrapped in pseudo-medical lingo to manufacture a crime when something terrible happened to a baby but no one knew what. After all, it was a baby, so someone must pay, even if no one did anything wrong.

The “syndrome” consisted of three medical criteria, “the trifecta of brain bleeding, swelling, and bleeding behind the eye.” Obviously, someone had to do something bad to a baby to make such horrifying things happen. The problem was that it wasn’t medically true and could just as well not be caused by anyone’s conduct.

Deborah Tuerkeimer, a professor of law at Northwestern University, has written extensively on the subject, and noted in a New York Times op-ed all the way back in 2010 that “bleeding in the brain can have many causes, including a fall, an infection, an illness like sickle-cell anemia or birth trauma.”

She added:

The new understanding of this diagnosis has only just begun to penetrate the legal realm. In 2008, a Wisconsin appeals court recognized that “a shift in mainstream medical opinion” had eroded the medical basis of shaken baby syndrome. The court granted a new trial to Audrey Edmunds, herself a mother of three, who had spent a decade in prison for murdering an infant in her care. Prosecutors later dismissed all charges.

This isn’t to say someone can’t shake a baby too hard, do serious harm and commit a heinous crime. It’s just that the diagnosis doesn’t prove it, and the last person with the baby isn’t guilty of a crime because of it. But that wasn’t the case for then-baby sitter Terry McKirchy in 1984.

A former babysitter who served a few months in jail for shaking a 5-month-old boy so forcefully 37 years ago that he suffered permanent brain damage now faces a possible life sentence after his death from those injuries in 2019, at age 35, the authorities said.

She was taking care of him at her home in Hollywood, Fla., on July 3, 1984, when he had difficulty breathing, the authorities said. His mother told investigators that she immediately took him to a hospital, where doctors found that he had been shaken with such force that it had severed the blood vessels to his brain.

Ms. McKirchy was sentenced to 60 days in jail and probation after pleading no contest in 1985 to charges of attempted murder and aggravated child abuse.

At the time of her prosecution in 1984, McKirchy was pregnant, and that, combined with the fact that the baby survived, influenced the disposition offered her, so she did the only rational thing available to her. She copped the plea.

McKirchy, the former Florida babysitter, did in fact plead guilty to shaking the baby. At the time she told the Miami Herald: “I know I didn’t do it. My conscience is clear. But I can’t deal with it anymore.” She would have faced 12-17 years in prison if found guilty.

Baby Benjamin grew up, severely disabled, and then 35 years later died. Forensic examiners attributed the cause of death to McKirchy’s “conduct” way back when.

Forensic experts considered the passage of time “between the injuries sustained and the death of the victim” when conducting the autopsy and ruled that “the death was directly caused by the injuries from 1984,” the Broward County State Attorney’s Office said in a statement this week. “The facts speak for themselves,” it said, “and this case was presented to the grand jury, which determined that this was a homicide.”

There is no statute of limitations for murder, so legally the 35 intervening years don’t matter. If it’s accurate that McKirchy pleaded no contest, then hopefully she didn’t allocute to any specific conduct, even if she conceded that she could not win at trial. It’s not good, but it’s a lot better than a sworn confession in court. Murder is a different crime than attempted murder, even though it was the same underlying conduct that gave rise to both crimes, so double jeopardy would not prevent her prosecution.

In 1984, people had no more doubt that SBS was real than they did that daycare centers were involved in Satanic pedophilia sacrifice rituals. Today we know more, but not a lot more as reflected by McKirchy’s indictment for a sham diagnosis backed up by Florida forensics. But here she is, age 59, 35 years after two terrible things happened, staring at a murder trial for what could, but could not, be a crime at all.

8 thoughts on “Short Take: Shaken Baby, 35 Years Later

  1. B. McLeod

    People are still going to prison on this “expert medical evidence” today. The word hasn’t got around the fifty states.

  2. John Barleycorn

    Too bad no one has ever written a definitive grand jury post…

    Someone is gonna “shake that baby” one of these days…

    P.S. inquiring minds want to hear about how deliciously maligned the evolution of the rule book is with this here plea you lawyers have backed yourselves into with this here conundrum of a plea.

    The “allucting” journey alone is worth a post…

      1. John Barleycorn

        Montik, gornisht
        Dinstik, gornisht
        Midvokh un Donershtik gornisht
        Fraytik, far a noveneh
        Gornisht pikveleh
        Shabes nach a mool gornisht

  3. Chris Halkides

    In her discussion (Chapter 4 in the 2017 book Forensic Science Reform) of meta-analyses on AHT, Waney Squier wrote, “There can be few other areas in medicine or science in which studies that rely on circular reasoning and are characterized by lack of controls and major biases can be viewed as an evolution in our understanding or are sufficiently reliable to improve diagnostic precision and make major medical decisions, let alone constitute a sufficient evidentiary basis for criminal convictions or for removing babies from their parents.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to editing or deletion if I deem them inappropriate for any reason or no reason. Hyperlinks are not permitted in comments and will be deleted. References to Nazis/Hitler will not be tolerated. I allow anonymous comments, but will not tolerate attacks unless you use your real name. Anyone using the phrase "ad hominem" incorrectly will be ridiculed. If you use ALL CAPS for emphasis, I will assume you wear a tin foil hat and treat you accordingly. I expect civility from you, but that does not mean I will respond in kind. This is my home and I make the rules. If you don't like my rules, then don't comment. Spam is absolutely prohibited, and you will be permanently banned.