So the fed is going to bailout Bear Sterns. After all, we can’t let yet another decidedly for-profit biz suffer the consequences of its subprime portfolio. What’s good for GM is good for America.
A recurring theme has been the government’s role in saving corporate America from its own poor choices. While Bush threatens to veto the Surveillance Bill because it doesn’t absolve the telecoms (which is clearly more important than national security), and over-extended quasi-homeowners get to renegotiate their mortgages because they happily cashed out of their homes to prove that consumerism is cool, there are a few of us who will have to hear Joe Hill’s words ring in our ears: There’ll be pie in the sky when you die.
Some people don’t make excuses. Instead, they make rational choices. We conduct our lives properly so that we live within our means, pay our bills, save our money and don’t find ourselves facing disaster every time it starts to drizzle outside. We make intelligent choices. We, apparently, are fools.
It would seem that living within your means is a good idea. We live without all the bells and whistles that others absolutely need to have. We don’t concern ourselves with shiny things. If we can’t afford something, we just keep walking.
When we buy a house, we put money on the table as a downpayment. We don’t take out a mortgage we can’t afford to pay. And we don’t lie on our mortgage applications.
When we run our business, we look carefully at our paperwork to make sure that it’s legitimate. We don’t tolerate, no less encourage, scams to skim a quick buck off the top and pass the garbage portfolio off to the next sucker, tied up in a pretty ribbon to make it look more attractive. When we make a business mistake, we eat it.
And what’s our reward for making the hard choices necessary to live a life of personal responsibility? We get to pay the taxes to bail out those who don’t. We get to pay the taxes to compensate for the shortfalls of those who can’t because they spent their mortgage money on a new Mercedes. They are driving around in a Mercedes that I am paying for. You too. Does that make you happy?
The news from Bear Stearns came after the bank had insisted for days that its finances were in adequate shape. But its chief executive said the bank’s liquidity had “significantly deteriorated” since Thursday. “We took this important step to restore confidence in us in the marketplace,” the executive, Alan Schwartz, said in a statement.
But there was no confidence, and there should be no confidence. They have a liquidity crisis for a reason. Actually 1.9 billion reasons. And it’s not like it hasn’t been coming for a while. Nobody wanted to look too closely. Nobody wanted to believe. And now the domino theory rears its ugly head.
What incentive is there for individuals or business to play it straight, tell the truth, act responsibly? So that you can be the last man standing when it comes time to collect to pay the bailout everyone else?
One guy’s having a great time, living large, and deep in debt. Another guy lives frugally, pays his bills and saves his money. Which guy wins? We really need to rethink personal responsibility.
Update: JPMorgan to buy Bear Sterns for $2 per share. It was trading at $100/share, down to $50 last Thursday. Not a bad deal, I supposed. Wonder if the bailout comes with the territory? H/T Volokh
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Back when Congress was bailing out Chrysler, Tom Paxton wrote a song:
I am changing my name to Chrysler
I am going down to Washington D.C.
I will tell some power broker
What they did for Iacocca
Will be perfectly acceptable to me
I am changing my name to Chrysler
I am headed for that great receiving line
So when they hand a million grand out
I’ll be standing with my hand out
Yes sir I’ll get mine
I love Tom Paxton. Thanks Anne.
A lot of big financial institutions are thought to be “too big to fail,” meaing that their failure would have such severe repercussions that the government would have to step in to save them. This protects the institution’s investors from the inherent risk of investing, encouraging them to invest more money in riskier ventures than would normally be prudent. Thus, being “too big to fail” actually encourages more failures.
I think it’s time for some tough love. The government and the Fed should let Bear Sterns bleed to death as an example to everyone else. That ought to put an end to this “too big to fail” nonsense.
I think that’s exactly right. Time to start letting chips fall where they may, and the bigger they are, the harder they fall. (Say, there’s a line that I could have used about a half dozen times this week).
Even Meltdowns Have Silver Linings
Yesterday Bear Sterns, today