When a trial ends with a hung jury, the law allows the case to be retried before a new jury. That’s the law, and it should be clear that any claim to the contrary is not the law. At least not yet.
The discharge of a deadlocked jury follows one of two events. The first is that the defendant moves or consents to the mistrial, which happens most of the time since a hung jury beats a conviction any day. The second is the court finding of “manifest necessity,” an urgent and overwhelming need to secure a fair trial. A deadlocked jury fills the bill. A deliberate act by prosecutors that compels a mistrial, such as showing the jury prejudicial inadmissible evidence, on the other hand, does not.
The rationale. as explained by justice Hugo Black in Wade v. Hunter, 1949, for permitting a retrial after a jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict is, if nothing else, practical. Continue reading
