Dan Hull at  What About Clients? scours the world for critical news, even when it involves the lowly criminal trial.  And thank goodness he does, or I might never have seen this post by Geeklawyer, perhaps the funniest ever.  Now I really want to meet  Ruthie too.

Just a tidbit, as it would be wrong to steal the thunder of such a brilliant barrister.

Disappointingly Geeklawyer did not get to hear the sluttily voiced Ruthie provide each and every member of the jury with remote oral sex from across the courtroom. Her leader was at fault: a thoroughly charming old school barrister, he insisted on using her for the jobs for which junior female counsel are conditioned by nature; fetching coffee cooking and ironing shirts. That is to say, a wife: but one to whom one need not give over 50% of one’s assets at the end of the trial/marriage.

It transpired however that the graceful and supple Geeklawyer’s dark presence caused pandemonium to Ruthie’s client. Not pandemonium of the usual heart, pitter patter, variety. No. Apparently Geeklawyer bore an uncanny resemblance to one of the defendants. When Geeklawyer turned up at court and sat at the back of the public area he was unaware of the turbulence he caused.

WAC once paid Simple Justice a huge compliment by saying, “Yeah, Simple Justice–they be bad….”   But I bow to the master, Geeklawyer.  He be baaaaaad.