What could go wrong? Remember that numbskull who ran the red light and almost killed you? In West Virginia, all you need do is whip out your handy-dandy smartphone and click. That’s right. There’s an app for that.
West Virginia has launched a smartphone app that’s one part clever crowdsourcing and community engagement and one part sinister report-on-your-neighbor Big Brotherism. The Suspicious Activity Reporting Application is exactly what it sounds like. See something that looks like a violation of the law, no matter how insignificant? Snap a pic, tag it with GPS, and anonymously report it to the state. Parking illegally will never be the same.
Developed as a project between the West Virginia Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the West Virginia Intelligence Fusion Center (yes, West Virginia has an Intelligence Fusion Center), the app–available in both Apple iOS and Android flavors–is being touted by the state as an improved means of community policing. The authorities can’t be everywhere all the time, and the more information they have the better they can serve their citizens.
It’s the next logical step following anonymous tip lines and the ubiquitous “see something, say something,” campaign the government enjoys to make us all part of the team.
We share a general desire to see crime reduced, if not eliminated. Since we can’t carry around our own personal cop, the next best thing is to play one on our iToys. The app eliminates the need to call less-than-enthusiastic dispatchers, who may not be nearly as concerned about our lousy neighbor parking too close to the fire hydrant (urgghh, that’s so annoying) as we are. With people doing bad things everywhere, it’s too hard to navigate the voicemail system. And besides, they still ask for our name, and nobody wants to get involved. With this app, all our problems magically disappear.
Yet it’s not without some issues.
But it’s easy to see how this could also spiral quickly into a mechanism for a lot of municipal and state waste, with police officers spending their hours checking out instances of dogs off the leash, neighbors parked in front of fire hydrants, and other trivial matters that don’t necessarily require police action.
Of course, triviality is in the eyes of the beholder. When it’s my neighbor parking in front of my fire hydrant, it’s hardly critical. When it’s yours, that’s an entirely different story. Please keep our police free to handle more important matters, the ones that affect me.
And then there’s the potential for abuse, which naturally I would never do but I can’t be so sure about you.
The fact that it allows tipsters to remain anonymous is also a bit troubling. No one wants to be known as the neighborhood snitch, but without any kind of accountability it seems like an easy avenue by which feuding neighbors or angry lovers or anyone else with a grudge can drag the state–needlessly and wastefully–into their disputes.
Unmention is it’s lulz potential. Need that special youtube video? A quick set-up photo and watch the Keystone Kops come and bust up the wedding down the street. Guaranteed to go viral.
What this doesn’t account for is the ongoing trend toward turning all of us into snitches, even if we were to handle this power with care and sincerity. Whether it’s the well-intended watcher who sees a white grandfather chasing playfully after his black granddaughter, and perceives a child kidnapping in the making, or bottles of spicy pickles mistaken for a bomb,
Most of us are reluctant to be the neighborhood snitch, or to rush to fearful judgment that we realize could prove disastrous to some innocent person. We’re not particularly adept at distinguishing the slightly unusual but easily explainable from the criminal, and we not inclined to become hysterical at any moment. The time it takes to think whether we see something truly criminal allows us to reflect and decide whether we’ve just observed a real threat or are feeling bit paranoid and getting worked up over nothing. We decide not to call.
This not only saves the police from wild good chases, but our fellow citizens from encounters that can too easily become tragedies.
Of course, that urge for revenge or to give that guy who cut you off on the highway some payback is strong. Combine it with anonymity and the ease of reporting that this app will bring and the damage we can do is obvious. Ah, how we can laugh and laugh as the police surround him with guns drawn, just waiting for the furtive movement opportunity. That will teach him not to mess with us, right?
For now, it appears to be limited to West Virginia. Yet another good reason to stay out of West Virginia. But just think of the fun you can have when it comes to your smartphone. Unless, of course, your neighbor takes a picture of you first.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

With any luck the bored dispatcher will be the one tasked with reading the e-snitches.
However, police departments will probably ramp up enforcement of ridiculous stuff because WHAT IF – someone who is the subject of an e-snitch (deservedly or not) about a minor claim, loud noise or the like, later commits a real crime resulting in real harm to someone. It is fuel to embarass the PD.
The city of Philadelphia just put up red light cameras at an intersection near my house, so now everyone slams on their brakes whenever the light turns yellow. The cameras have turned a pretty safe intersection into an unsafe intersection — I’ve almost been rear-ended several times.
Well today I learned that the city contends I owe them $100 based on the camera. Even though it’s unclear if I ran the red light or was making a left hand turn.
In addition, the ticket was verified (attested to) by “police officer” (yes, you read that right) and the signature is totally illegible. So someone somewhere in the Philadelphia Police Department apparently swore that the camera was working fine that day, and they reviewed the ticket, but the city won’t tell me who that person is and what actual steps they took before making that attestation.
Interesting.
Surely, this can’t be a robo-signature as was common in the mortgage foreclosure industry… right?
And surely, these cameras weren’t put it to make more money from the city, or to spend the city’s money on stuff probably purchased from a councilman’s friend. No, obviously the cameras were meant to make our intersections safer, even though they do the opposite.
I’m thinking about putting up a fight, even though it didn’t add any points to my license. I know I can take it to the Parking Authority and they’ll let me pay $50, but this might be worth raising a stink over.
Or you could just stop committing crimes.
So when I am driving down the road and see someone driving unsafely, I should fish out my smartphone, unlock the screen, browse through my apps, pull up the “see something, tweet something” app, snap a pic of the offender, check to make sure the license plate is legible, look up the number for forwarding the pic and forward it, then check to make sure the ‘send’ went through? What could go wrong with that?
Kinda reminds me of the billboard that reminds drivers that it is unsafe to text and drive and that if you want more safe driving tips, just send them a text message.
Pingback: There’s An App For That, Volume 32 | Simple Justice