Much of the law cheaps out by making a test of language and conduct subject to the “reasonable person,” a theoretically objective standard that tests a claim against what some mythical “reasonable person” would think. Its purpose being that the law does not require a person to conduct themselves in such a way as no claim of harm is based on the most the sensibilities of the most “delicate flower.”
There’s always someone who will claim harm, offense, trauma or victimhood over something that most people would shrug off. Call me a dope and I won’t sue. Give me a little shove on the subway and I won’t run to the cops. When I get a papercut, I don’t call Turkewitz to sue. There is an old legal maxim, de minimis non curat lex, the law doesn’t bother with trifles. Reasonable people don’t lose their heads over every petty slight. Continue reading

