What’s striking is the underwhelming characterization of the writer in this New York Times twit.

OnlyFans “offers the illusion of safety and deniability for producer and consumer alike,”  Catharine MacKinnon, a lawyer, writes in a guest essay.

A lawyer? Catharine MacKinnon? How very modest. With Andrea Dworkin gone, MacKinnon would be in the lead, axe in hand, smashing reel to reel movie projectors in “art film” houses across the nation, because porn is evil. Continue reading →

Whether you choose to put away the seersucker suit for the season is up to you, but Labor Day was established in 1894 to celebrate the “contributions and achievements of American workers” in the early days of the Industrial Revolution, when working conditions were so dangerous and horrific as to be unfathomable to today’s worker. And thankfully, legislation changed much of that, between the Wagner Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, and later the  Civil Rights Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act and Equal Pay Act, workers have enjoyed vast improvements over the past century.

But what about now? According to MIT prof David Autor, while pandemic benefits have played a role in the current labor shortage, the rules is insignificant. The lack of affordable child care has also been raised as a reason, but that, too, doesn’t empirically bear out as the cause of the problem. He posits another rationale. Continue reading →

Had it been used to stay an execution, it would be glorified. But this time, the outcome was contrary to pop desires and, in my view, wrong, even though the Supreme Court, in my view, is often wrong. When the Supreme Court refused to enjoin Texas’ sweetest gift to the Democrats ever, SB8, the reaction from the left wasn’t just to catastraphize the ruling at the brutal back door murder of Roe v. Wade, but proof that the Supreme Court had to go.

There were the usual calls to expand the Court to put a majority of reliable and dedicated progressives on the bench, so the Court would never rule “wrong” again. But Jamelle Bouie at the New York Times found a new demon to slay: The Shadow Docket. Continue reading →

The Commonwealth of Virginia accepted a gift of property in Richmond in 1890. The legislature approved a resolution in 1889. The Governor signed off on it in 1890. The property came with a catch.

On July 15, 1887, the heirs of William C. Allen (the Allen heirs) conveyed by deed (the 1887 Deed) to the Lee Monument Association a round piece of property (the Circle) located at the intersection of Monument Avenue and Allen Avenue, which is now in the City of Richmond, Virginia. The terms of the 1887 Deed required the grantee, the Lee Monument Association, to
use the Circle as a site for a monument to Confederate General Robert E. Lee (General Lee), and required the Lee Monument Association to hold the Circle “only for the said use.” Several months later, the Lee Monument Association commissioned an equestrian statue of General Lee and a pedestal (together, the Lee Monument) to be erected on the Circle.

Continue reading →

It’s hard not to ascribe the worst of motives to the former Glynn County, Georgia, district attorney over her decision to do nothing about three men, one of whom had worked for her, over the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. There was video. We saw it. Could this be anything but a whitewash?

But once Jackie Johnson was voted out of office as DA, after the case was transferred to other prosecutors for investigation and prosecution, and the three defendants were charged with Arbery’s murder, what was left to do? Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr indicted Johnson. Continue reading →

Regardless of what side you take on abortion, there is no doubt that Texas’ SB8 is unconstitutional under the extant Supreme Court decisions, and no justice suggests otherwise. They may not like precedent, but Roe v. Wade and Casey are still the law of the land. That can’t be changed by a procedural petition on the shadow docket, but that doesn’t mean critical and permanent damage can’t be done.

This wasn’t just any case, but as high profile and controversial a case as it gets. Indeed, if Texas was desperately trying to provide the people on the political cusp with a reason to vote Democratic, they couldn’t have done better than this. There is a good chance this will rally the left and overcome whatever misgivings the moderates have about the Dems’ embrace of its most radical fringe. They’ve been shrieking about what the crazy right will do with abortion, and Texas just proved their worst fears to have merit. The implications of this Texas lunacy are staggering. Continue reading →

For the Trump years, he was the darling of progressives, lending his once-formidable gravitas to ideas ranging from the bizarre to the ridiculous. And even after Trump, Harvard conlaw prawf Larry Tribe was the “go to” guy for Biden to manufacture a nonsensical rationalization to “reimagine” a CDC eviction ban that no serious person could take seriously. But since that was the outcome progressives so desperately wanted, Tribe was the hero they needed.

Larry Tribe was flying high on the left, the worthier bookend to the Harvard crimlaw prawf, Alan Dershowitz, who shockingly played the same role for the other tribe. And then it all came crashing down. Continue reading →

At Persuasion, possibly because the newest New York Times columnist couldn’t get through the editorial gate, John McWhorter presents a ten point catechism of the new religion of neoracism.

He’s given the high priestesses the title “The Elect,” because they take SJW and woke as derogatory and, outside of their ideological views on social justice, are otherwise perfectly nice people who do ordinary jobs and are fun at parties. They’re not zealots, he explains, except when they’re zealots. Continue reading →

It’s hard to blame Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen for making a basic legal mistake. After all, she’s no lawyer and her bachelor’s degree in comparative lit likely didn’t include much on the significance of mens rea. This is why she frames her post about sexual assaults around the “unintended,” even though an unintentional act cannot be an assault. And that’s why she goes so very wrong.

We are about to enter the Red Zone.

That’s the period between the start of the college semester and Thanksgiving break, during which more than 50 percent of campus sexual assaults occur. Continue reading →

You sit back down at the defense table after asking juror 19 the usual questions and getting the usual replies revealing nothing. In response to the judge’s question, she says without hesitation that she can follow the law as he gives it and can be fair to the defendant. But you see something in her eye, a glint of hatred as she stares at the defendant. She hates your client. She says she can be fair, but she can’t. You see it. You know it. But if this trial is happening in Arizona, there won’t be a damn thing you can do about it come next January 1st.

Arizona’s top court is eliminating the longstanding practice of allowing lawyers in criminal and civil trials in state courts to remove potential jurors without explanation, a move that proponents said would help prevent discrimination in the selection of trial jurors. Continue reading →