Author Archives: SHG

Canceling The Curmudgeon

It was curious that he was a member of the board and former president of the National Book Critics Circle if he was such a disagreeable fellow. Yet, Carlin Romano, writer, philosopher, critic, was on the board and, accordingly, did what a board member is supposed to do.

One critics circle board member, Columbia University professor John McWhorter, an African American, agreed with him on the substance of the anti-racism pledge, but told the website Vulture that Romano’s way of expressing his dissent was a bit tone-deaf.  He “was not being a modern person in the way he responded” to the anti-racism pledge, McWhorter said, perhaps referring to Romano’s charge that some of the arguments of the anti-racism pledge were “absolute nonsense.”

How exacty does a “modern person” express himself? Continue reading →

Prickett: Prosecutor To Judge, “Hold My Beer”

Ed. Note: Greg Prickett is a former police officer and supervisor who went to law school, hung out a shingle, and now practices criminal defense and family law in Fort Worth, Texas. While he was a police officer, he was a police firearms instructor, and routinely taught armed tactics to other officers.

In the middle of West Texas is Midland County. It’s due south of Amarillo and due east of El Paso. Just to the west is Odessa. This is the heart of both West Texas and “good ol’ boy” country. It is also where a prosecutor worked as a law clerk for a state district judge at the same time that he was actually prosecuting the same case. Continue reading →

Ad Homonym

For a while, Eugene Volokh has been arguing the case of using the “n-word” when accurate reading or discussing caselaw. He’s personally unapologetic about using the language accurately, it being a matter of fact rather than a political performance.

As I always do, I discussed the facts, without expurgation or euphemisms. A few weeks after the class, I learned that some students had disapproved, but I didn’t discuss it further with any students.

The question isn’t whether Eugene is right or wrong. Some contend that the word should not, cannot, be used (except by a black person) under any circumstances. Some may contend that racist epithets are free speech, so they can use it with abandon. Others, like Eugene, argue that when the word is accurate and relevant, used not to attack but as part of pedagogy, the word is just a word. Continue reading →

Facebook Allows Only Guilty Talk

No, it’s not a violation of anyone’s First Amendment rights. It’s Facebook. They can make their own rules, and they have. When it comes to Kyle Rittenhouse, who wounded one and killed two in Kenosha, they made their rules.

By taking down links to pay Mr. Rittenhouse’s legal fees, the company is interfering with his ability to raise money for his defense in a way other criminal defendants might. The fact that the platform may only be used to declare Mr. Rittenhouse’s guilt, but not his innocence—though lawyers say the self-defense argument is plausible—could prejudice a jury pool in the high-profile case. One of America’s most powerful companies is effectively giving its official imprimatur to Wisconsin prosecutors’ case against a specific defendant.

Continue reading →

Short Take: Posin’ Like You Opposin’

Her revelation was as bizarre as her prior pretense at being black, using the vernacular of the street as heard through the ears of a Jewish girl from Kansas.

To an escalating degree over my adult life, I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness that I had no right to claim: first North African Blackness, then US rooted Blackness, then Caribbean rooted Bronx Blackness. I have not only claimed these identities as my own when I had absolutely no right to do so — when doing so is the very epitome of violence, of thievery and appropriation, of the myriad ways in which non-Black people continue to use and abuse Black identities and cultures — but I have formed intimate relationships with loving, compassionate people who have trusted and cared for me when I have deserved neither trust nor caring. People have fought together with me and have fought for me, and my continued appropriation of a Black Caribbean identity is not only, in the starkest terms, wrong — unethical, immoral, anti-Black, colonial — but it means that every step I’ve taken has gaslighted those whom I love.

Continue reading →

Dog-Whistling Past The Rubble

The word “dog-whistling” is one of those cool new compound words, like “pearl-clutching” and “gaslighting,” that captures the evils perpetrated against the woke. No explanation needed. Just utter the word and, boom, you negated whatever was said, whether well-reasoned or not. In the case of “dog-whistling,” it means that you put out seemingly neutral ideas into the ether that may be silent to some, but can be heard by racist ears to be a call to their prejudice.

A lawyer friend on the twitters accused me of dog-whistling. He didn’t use the word, but his point was the same. My dog-whistle? The call to end the riots, the looting, the violence and destruction. As the discussion fleshed out, it wasn’t that he was suggesting that my condemnation against violence was intended to be a dog whistle. Indeed, he told me that he, too, was against violence because violence was an inherently bad thing. Continue reading →

Short Take: Videos Come Full Circle

Remember the many times we were outraged at the police denying people the right to take video of their actions in public? It was against the law, they claimed. They arrested people for doing so. They seized their phones. They deleted the video. It was outrageous, wrong and nothing more than an obvious ploy to conceal their misconduct from scrutiny.

Welcome to Portland, where it’s happening again, but not by the cops this time.

“YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO FILM!” is a cry you hear incessantly at protests in Portland, Oregon, always shouted at close range to your face by after-dark demonstrators. You can assert that, yes, you can film; you can point out that they themselves are filming incessantly; you can push their hands away from covering your phone; you can have your phone record them stealing your phone—all of these things have happened to me—and none will have any impact on their contention that “YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO FILM” and its occasional variation, “PHOTOGRAPHY EQUALS DEATH!”

Continue reading →

A Really Futile and Stupid Gesture

Looting is justified as reparations to the oppressed. Burning stores and buildings is justifed as imposing a cost on those who disagree, making their capitulation less costly than their disapproval. Neither withstands minimal rational scrutiny, and only the truest of believers buy the sophistic and fallacious arguments, not that they’re reluctant to spew them so others conclusively know they’re fools.

But blocking a highway?

Continue reading →

“Hostile Crowd Forming”

The time was 4:38 pm on September 2nd when local NBC reporter Mark Seagraves broke the new on twitter.

While he used the dreaded phrase “police involved shooting,” the passive vagary that conceals the fact that he meant a cop shot a person, he offered nothing to suggest what happened or why beyond a person being shot. Yet, there it was. “Hostile crowd forming.” And the call to arms was seized upon by Black Lives Matter DC. Continue reading →

Where Are the Liberal Warriors?

If Fox News polls tell the story, Trump is going to lose. Whether that happens remains a product of what happens on the streets and what comes out of his twitter feed, a battle for who can turn people off harder and faster, albeit each in their own special way.

But the day is still young, and there’s so much opportunity for either side to do something so outrageously awful. But there is a disconnect here, as Trump suffers from his own actions while Biden is tainted by the actions of others, who don’t like him, won’t listen to him and see him as the next hurdle to surmount in their quest for hegemony. Jonah Goldberg explains why. Continue reading →