Suicide By Cop: When Stupid Prevails

In a recent post, Noblesville police shot a 27-year-old suicidal man. The rationale was that he had a gun and, well, the First Rule of Policing kicked in, trumping whatever purpose the police might have had in preventing a suicide. Ironic and fundamentally contrary to anything remotely resembling sound judgment and practice, but at least there was an excuse.

Not this time.

Why exactly 44-year-old Michael Angel Ruiz decided that a rooftop in Phoenix was a good place to be isn’t clear, but there is nothing about being up there that puts a cop at risk.  And nothing about coming down from there that does so either. Via Police State USA:

After sustaining electric shocks from police, Ruiz complied with requests to come off the roof.  Video taken by witnesses shows him hopping down to a balcony.  An unidentified Phoenix police officer immediately greeted him with a choke-hold.  Police used overwhelming force on the man, who had still shown no signs of aggression.  Witness Gary Carthen told ABC 15 that Ruiz was “getting choked out and tased at the same time.”  He remained in a choke-hold for at least three minutes, reported KPHO.

Ruiz being dragged down the stairs, with his head banging against every step. (Source: ABC 15)Ruiz being dragged down the stairs, with his head banging against every step. (Source: ABC 15)

The most disturbing moments were to come.  Michael Ruiz, now fully restrained, was dragged down the concrete stairs on his face.  As deputies held his arms behind his back, they allowed his head to dangle and thump against every stair.  At this point Ruiz may have already lost consciousness, and was making no attempt to lift his head.  Video shows him lifelessly suffering head trauma on the descent down the stair case.

Straining to find some thread of reason in the police handling of this guy, the best I can do is think that the officer who decided to place Ruiz in a choke hold as he came off the roof did so by rote, to exert control over a person because, in his head, he heard voices telling him “control people, control people.”  And so he did.

In taking him down the stairs in such a way as to cause his head to “dangle and thump against every stair,” the police coalesced into groupthink, the risky shift that allows individuals to let go of any personal responsibility for stupidity in order to engage in conduct that is far more harmful, risky and stupid.

They do this because the group is doing this, and while it may have occurred to each and every officer that thumping Ruiz’s head against the stairs was about the worst thing they could possibly do, nobody will buck the group. Never forget, groups tend to be far worse when it comes to decision-making than any individual.

Yet another irony, Ruiz’s father is a retired LAPD detective.

“I just felt sick to my stomach,” said Richard Erickson, the man’s father, to ABC 15. “I’d never seen anything like this before, even when I was with the police department.”

Ruiz apparently had problems with drugs, which is the sort of thing one would expect his father, the detective, to be sufficiently concerned about that he would become deeply involved in addressing. While what happened on the roof and after has nothing to do with the father, it seems pretty likely that Ruiz would not have been on the roof had he been doing something a little more socially productive. Just an aside.

Similarly, the father’s assertion that he never saw anything like this, “even when [he] was with the police department,” seems a bit peculiar, given his tenure in Los Angeles, unless he wasn’t watching TV the day Stacey Koon, Laurence Powell and three other officers dragged Rodney King out of the cab of his truck and beat him. Also just an aside, but one that any cop readers may want to bear in mind since their child may someday find himself having problems with drugs or on a rooftop in Phoenix.

When asked what the hell they were doing, the Phoenix Police Department issued this statement:

We will have to decline your request for an interview at this time. There is currently an ongoing administrative investigation into this matter. As you know, state law precludes us from commenting on administrative investigations. We will wait until the entire investigative process has been completed.

Whether “state law precludes” the cops from commenting on administrative investigations, it’s hard to imagine that anything would prevent the police from responding to a video that shows them engaging in conduct of such monumental and inexplicable stupidity that it cost Ruiz his life.

The need to find an explanation for conduct that, on its surface, defies explanation leads us to leap either to bizarre and irrational excuses or malevolent accusations.  As there is no rational basis to explain the police conduct here, the easiest alternative is to attribute it to viciousness. But frankly, that makes no sense either. This wasn’t a guy who did anything to anger the cops per se, aside from making them work in the hot sun. And that’s not generally a reason why cops would kill someone.

Rather, it strikes me that this is just a product of such monumental stupidity, coupled perhaps with the absence of any sincere concern for the harm they were doing to the guy, that it defies Darwin’s theory.  People can be just as easily killed by stupid as by malice, and Hanlon’s Razor suggests that stupid killed Michael Angel Ruiz.

14 comments on “Suicide By Cop: When Stupid Prevails

  1. Barry Sheridan

    While I am English I have long liked the majority of ordinary Americans for their generosity of spirit and fundamental decency. That said, it does appear as if this sort of incident represents an ugly and growing trend, one that makes me wonder how long it will be before the wider population turn on the authorities for their indifference to what was little more than barbarous cruelty. All the more so because the individual concerned was more a danger to himself than anyone else.

    1. SHG Post author

      Never underestimate American exceptionalism, which somehow makes the majority of ordinary Americans not give a damn as long as it doesn’t touch them.

      1. Barry Sheridan

        This trait affects most people and cultures, not just Americans. Pretty much like that here I am sorry to say.

  2. Allen

    The story’s up on policeone.com, and the comment section delivers as always. My favorite of the comments there: “I only saw what little the liberal media allowed us to see, I hope the officers are found to have acted appropriately despite what the video shows.”

    1. Onlooker

      Yep, that’s some epic denial at play.

      Who you gonna believe, the cops that perpetrated this gross injustice, or your own “lyin’ eyes”; well the cops, of course, say the brethren.

  3. Tom

    I’m sure they’ll find everything was justified because if they hadn’t killed he would’ve continued being threat to himself.

  4. Fubar

    SHG wrote:

    The need to find an explanation for conduct that, on its surface, defies explanation leads us to either leap to bizarre and irrational excuses, or malevolent accusations.

    I think an explanation that is neither an irrational excuse nor a malevolent accusation can be stated in three simple words: Because we can.

    The worst prospect any involved officer is likely to face will be suspension with pay for a few days or weeks pending an administrative investigation. That is even arguably a reward, a paid vacation.

    The administrative investigation will conclude, as they always do, that Mr. Ruiz’ death was his own fault. The costs incurred from any suit by Mr. Ruiz’ family will be borne by the city and its insurance carrier, not by any officer.

    Every officer can reasonably conclude from those nigh universal outcomes that he can do as he pleases with impunity, and with even some prospect of reward for it. So they do. Because they can.

    1. SHG Post author

      Do you really think the cops that evil that they realized they were killing the guy but just didn’t care? That’s cold. While it’s true they can, it’s also they true they don’t have to. There was no reason in the world to kill Ruiz, not even annoyance, and yet they did.

      1. Fubar

        Worse. Their behavior was amoral, not immoral. Evil and immorality require scienter, and suggest denying the pangs of a rudimentary working conscience.

        They didn’t know they were killing Mr. Ruiz because they didn’t stop to think whether they might be. They weren’t required to. They weren’t trained to.

        They knew they wanted to get the perp down the stairs. They knew they could do it any way they wished. That’s all they needed to know to do the job and get home safely.

        Mr. Ruiz was compliant and didn’t resist or protest, or even bleed much. He just went thump, thump, thump as they pulled him down the stairs.

        Had Mr. Ruiz resisted, they could have beaten him to death with impunity. Then at least they would have known they were inflicting injury, and if they had a conscience, they would have been acting evilly.

        But neither conscience nor common sense were required of them. Those aren’t job requirements. So they had no training or experience in those realms.

  5. Jean Thaxton

    Come on now ….. the male reporter called this a ‘split second decision’ Give me a break! These officers were in no danger, and they tased him, hog tied him, and then drug him down concrete steps with his head banging on each step…where does ‘split second decision’ come in? And just exactly what crime did he commit? Scaring his neighbors? ….oh yeah, kill a man for that!

    1. SHG Post author

      The male reporter’s “split second decision” drivel struck me as his not having a clue how to balance the story with the required media effort to present a balanced piece. It was utterly ridiculous, but the best he could come up with.

  6. Pingback: Be Thankful To Live In St. John Parish | Simple Justice

Comments are closed.