In a remarkably scholarly post, Mark Bennett at Defending People explains why the model revenge porn law being promoted by Danielle Citron and Mary Anne Franks is constitutionally infirm, and why their arguments that the First Amendment doesn’t apply are, well, wrong.
I’m sure they will embrace his arguments and engage in a thoughtful discussion of the issues. Any time now.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Pingback: Revenge Porn and the Death of Article 230? The Answer is 42 | Simple Justice