Prosecuting Pointlessness

Grand futile gestures are as American as apple pie. So a group that calls itself Rise and Resist decided to give it a go by unfurling a banner at the Statue of Liberty that read “Abolish ICE.” This was when Trump’s family separation and zero tolerance immigration were the outrage of the day.

The earlier protest involved members of Rise and Resist, a group formed after the 2016 presidential election, who hung a banner calling for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be abolished. Members of the group, angered by the Trump administration’s immigration policies, called the agency a “threat to our liberty and way of life.”

What they managed to accomplish was an evacuation of Liberty Island, in the neighborhood of 4,500 people from around the world who came to visit the Statue. 

“It is their one and only chance to come here,” [National Parks spokesman Jerry Willis] said. “Unfortunately, we had to clear the island.”

But one person involved in the protest decided to take it a step further.

The woman started climbing shortly after 3 p.m. on what officials described as one of the busiest days of the year for the national monument. National Park Service officials said that more than 20,000 tourists typically visit the monument each July 4.

Throughout the afternoon, the woman, identified by federal officials as Therese Okoumou, waved what looked like a T-shirt and reclined in a crease of the statue’s robe. The copper is only about one-tenth of an inch thick, and officials feared she could damage the statue.

Known as “Pat,” the woman was there for the banner, but not part of the group. She climbed the base and sat at the foot of the statue. Why? According to Jay Walker, an organizer of the protest, said they had no idea she was going to do this.

“She’s a free citizen in the world — it’s a choice she made,” Mr. Walker said. “I think the choice she made is certainly bringing more attention to the overall protest.”

He added, “We don’t condemn her for the choice she made, and we’re going to do anything we can to support her.”

So you didn’t hear about this protest? You knew nothing about “free citizen of the world” Pat Okoumou’s bold, brave climb? If you weren’t one of the 4,500 people whose one chance to visit the Statue of Liberty was blown by this grand futile gesture of insignificant civil disobedience, why would you? Why would anyone?

The Rise and Resist group sent out a press release yesterday, trying desperately to “raise consciousness” and catch some interest. In a moment of weakness, I read it.

New York, NY — This FRIDAY, August 3, 2018 around 10am, Patricia Okoumou, the woman who bravely scaled the Statue of Liberty on July 4, will go to court to face charges that resulted from her protest. U.S. Attorney Berman appears to be intent to bring full charges, but Patricia is fighting back.

She has launched a petition calling for the U.S. attorney to drop the charges and focus their attention on the source of the problem: family detentions and Trump’s anti-immigrant policy traumatizing children and families at our borders. Full petition is linked here.

It’s unclear how one differentiates between “bravely scaled” and any other type of scaled. Maybe fear of heights? But the sacrifice of adjectives to the cause are the least of Okoumou’s concerns. Engaging in civil disobedience, no matter how pointless, is a time-honored American tradition. What makes it civil disobedience is the willingness to suffer the consequences.

Geoffrey Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, is probably not personally involved in this huge case, but because this happened at a National Park, the case landed in his office. What “full charges” he’s bringing isn’t stated, but no federal prosecution is fun. They’re unlikely to result in a level 34 sentence, but still.

Okoumou, however, is “fighting back.” There isn’t much of a factual dispute, although there might be a claim of diminished responsibility, but it seems unlikely she’ll pursue that direction. Instead, she’s taking the “petition” route. Eradicate the “real” evil rather than prosecute a protester who disrupted a visit to Liberty Island by 4,500 people and might have damaged the statue.

So what if this isn’t how it works. For someone who believes that climbing the base of the Statue of Liberty is going to make the world a better place, collecting signatures on a petition seems eminently reasonable. Plus, Okoumou is now a speaker, as her actions clearly mean she has something of value to say.

As part of her ongoing fight against Trump’s devastating border policies, TOMORROW, July 31, 2018 at 10:30 am, Patricia Okoumou will join protestors with Rise and Resist to deliver remarks outside of an event featuring Vice President Mike Pence and Homeland Security Secretary Neilsen. Hosted by the Families Belong Together, the protest will take place outside of a conference hosted by the agency in New York City.

Does she deserve to be prosecuted with “full charges”? Of course. That’s the nature of civil disobedience. It doesn’t count without consequences, and how else can she be a martyr and go on a speaking tour to crowds of tens. But Berman’s office should go easy, maybe even nolle the case, as anyone who suffers such a tenuous grasp of reality has to already endure a life of grand futile gestures where the only outcome was making 4,500 people miserable for the sake of her righteous narcissism. Isn’t that punishment enough?


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

20 thoughts on “Prosecuting Pointlessness

  1. Simeon Hope

    “their one and only chance to come here” – I live in the UK and know nothing about visiting rules for this French gift to the USA. Are visitors not allowed to return?

    1. Jay

      Hello, I’m your American Culture Education Ambassador. Here, the speaker appears to assume that many people who travel to the US from around the world to celebrate July 4 maybe, perhaps, don’t have the ability, funds, etc to make a return trip if they were impacted by Statue Pat’s ridiculous antics.

  2. Richard

    Shouldn’t she be seeking the most severe punishment possible to up the outrage: Separation of families AND however many years in the pen for protesting that separation?

  3. Black Bellamy

    Obviously the only proper punishment is for her to have to clean the Statue of Liberty. The outside of it, where she scuffed it up.

  4. LocoYokel

    YOU EVIL, RACIST, MISOGYNIST, SHITLORD!!!11!!1!1 She was so BRAVE to go to the STATUE and put up the banner and climb up to have her picture taken. HOW DARE YOU EXPECT HER TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR HER ACTIONS!!!111!!11 Civil disobedience having repercussions so so 1960s, get with the times. Nowadays it is consequence free and everybody who participates gets a bravery medal.

    I am filing a complaint with the New York Bar Association at this very minute to get you disbarred for this outrage!!!!1 *

    * Yes, I know the NY Bar doesn’t handle disciplinary actions. Satire people….

  5. B. McLeod

    I bravely scaled a fish once. Nobody wrote about it, but I didn’t get charged with anything either.

  6. Mark Creatura

    “Unfortunately, we had to clear the island.”
    Really, because people unfurled a banner? The _government_ decided to throw a few thousand people out of a park because a banner was displayed. And now we talk about how those thousands were harmed by the act of protest. The protesters didn’t want the park cleared; they wanted their banner(s) seen.
    It’s as if a politically incorrect speaker were to start a speech at Berkeley, locals were to throw Molotovs, campus and city police were to stand by, and then we were to talk about all the fire damage caused by the speaker.
    Or maybe it isn’t the same, but I don’t see the difference.
    And let’s not be diverted by minutiae related to where climber Pat was climbing, or where she might fall, or whether anyone should care about her. I trust that Scott reported this straight: the government decided to clear the park _before_ “one person involved in the protest decided to take it a step further.”

    1. MelK

      It appears that the park service started clearing the island a half hour after Okoumou started climbing. The only real explanation I can think of (sans snark facilitated by lack of knowledge), is for PR purposes, against ‘the worst case scenario’.

      1. SHG Post author

        I’m not at all surprised that they evacuated the island. I’m mostly surprised they waited as long as they did. Had things gone south and a tourist been hurt, there would have been outrage at their failure to do so and putting people at risk. Can’t have it both ways.

  7. Jake

    I guess the question is, does ‘full charges’ mean trespassing, which she is clearly guilty of…Or are they going to Aaron Swartz her?

  8. JC

    I think Prager’s SIX HIRB is still my fav – Sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, islamophobic, racist, bigoted

Comments are closed.