It’s easy to dismiss the blight of student loan debt if you’re not someone crushed by it. It’s easy to see why “cancellation” of student loan debt is critical if you are. Addressing the issue, however, is anything but easy.
But pressure is building to enact some kind of dramatic giveaway before the midterms. And word from the White House is that Biden has magically found his legal authority.
Before the leak of the Alito draft opinion, this might have been seen as a pandering ploy, a payoff to the progressive wing of the party to get them motivated enough to give the Dems a fighting chance in the midterms that they were almost assured to lose. In the alternative, if the Dems were going to lose the midterms anyway, Biden might as well do something he promised during his campaign that was deeply desired by the Warren and Sanders supporters.
Of course, there is no such thing as cancellation of debt. There is only the shifting of it off the party who signed for it and received the education onto those who didn’t go to college, those who suffered to pay for it and those who understood what they were doing. While there are, obviously, a great many variations on this theme, these are people who played by the rules.
Here’s the problem, though: A lot of other families made the difficult decision not to accrue that debt. Parents chose to forgo retirement savings or nicer houses in order to sock money away for college. Students chose cheaper state schools over private colleges, or they decided to pass on college altogether.
Millions of other graduates who did take out loans worked for years or decades to pay them off, making their own set of painful career and family sacrifices along the way.
Do those Americans who played by the rules deserve to be rewarded or punished for their responsibility? But it’s important to remember that they aren’t the only ones playing by the rules.
The students who borrowed all that money were following the rules, just as previous generations did. But as the cost of college rose dramatically, so did the debt burden, even as salaries in many industries failed to keep up.
We told students that if they worked hard, got into college and studied, they would find success in their career and be rewarded for their effort. It didn’t necessarily turn out that way.
Some come to college academically unprepared. They accrue debt but can’t graduate. Others have a “life happens” moment. Maybe a parent gets sick, and they have to quit school to support the family. Some attended subpar colleges that, they discover later, did nothing to make them more valuable in the marketplace.
These precarious students and grads are trying to make the leap at a historically difficult moment. The financial crisis and Covid pummeled young adult career trajectories. Education and real estate prices have soared. By the time the boomers hit a median age of 35, their generation owned 22 percent of the nation’s wealth. Millennials — who will hit a median age of 35 in 2023 — own about 6 percent of the nation’s wealth.
And then there are the progressive overlays to the problems, that student debt is largely an elite problem that will benefit the wealthy far more than the poor and whites more than blacks. That doesn’t mean, however, that black students who played by the rules haven’t been hit hard.
According to a 2016 Brookings report, the average Black graduate owes $52,726 four years after graduation, compared with $28,006 for the average white graduate. Black borrowers are also much more likely to be behind on their payments.
While Diversity, Equity and Inclusion are the three most important words in higher education at the moment, they’ve been a cruel joke for many black students suckered into playing the college game they were ill-equipped to win. They leave without a degree but with a ton of debt. They get very expensive worthless degrees whether from garbage schools or decent schools with garbage majors.
And then there’s the fact that student loan debt is the symptom, not the disease. Colleges got this money from students who may have a diploma in hand but a paycheck too meager to pay off the debt and eat. And colleges aren’t giving it back. As long as the student loan debt pipeline continues to gush money, tuition can soar and the next generation of debtors crushed by loans will be born. And yet, nobody tells them what they will earn with their shiny new grievance studies degree.
It’s easy to be for or against dealing with students loan debt. It’s easy to embrace the rationale the best serves your situation. If you were burdened with debt, wouldn’t you want it forgiven? And if you scrimped and saved to pay for college, wouldn’t you be against a handout to the irresponsible? Sure, there are people who are more generous on either side, but siding with your enlightened self-interest is certainly the majority view.
There are some obvious potential solutions, such as making student loan debt dischargeable in bankruptcy, eliminating interest but not principal on current debt and forgiveness for those who were scammed by for-profit colleges, who are below the poverty line, who have suffered secondary problems such as health issues that have made their circumstances untenable through no fault of their own.
What about perpetuating the myth that any college diploma is worth it, that any student of color, no matter how ill-prepared, should go to college? What about colleges whose tuition costs have skyrocketed and now can’t walk back their DEI and Title IX departments, even though they suck up huge amounts of money? What about issuing more debt for majors that will never earn enough to pay it back. Won’t the next gen student assume his debt will be “canceled” as well? Isn’t that a right? So why bother to scrimp and save when you can take out debt that will be forgiven?
It’s a huge, complicated problem and fixing it is anything but easy. Will Biden address these many complications or just push the “easy button” and make it magically disappear, to the appreciation of some at the expense of others, while the disease still festers?
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Debt forgiveness is taxable income here in the U.S. So if debt is forgiven, Uncle Sam is going to be coming around in April asking for income tax on all that income. They won’t be getting extra cash to pay that tax with. But since that won’t be until after the election …
I don’t want to be reddit, but there is some right and a lot wrong in this statement. Check with an expert.
That rule can always be changed.
Everyone needs to borrow and go to law school. The enlightened ABA is now considering dropping all requirements for admission testing so more people can.
Yes, of course the write-off is unfair to people who paid back their loans or sacrificed to avoid taking loans, and it will likely affect willingness of lenders to extend loans thereafter, but this is about buying votes. The democrats can’t afford to lose any supporters in the mid-terms, even if it means passing out millions in freebies in the middle of an inflationary cycle.
Note: From looking at the results of my YT search, it seems the youngsters don’t even know the meaning of the word, so when I call all your lame asses ‘pikers’ I’m referring to number 2, below.
piker
noun
1. a gambler who makes only small bets.
2. a person who withdraws from a plan, commitment, etc.
Then they certainly would know what “They’re crawfising” would mean.
Student loans have become a form of Cslvin Ball.
Every time I pay my daughter’s tuition, I feel like a sucker. I know it would be financially better to have her borrow and wait for it to be forgiven but I just can’t do it. Being a responsible person sucks these days.
Thank you, Mr. Greenfield, for writing, “As long as the student loan debt pipeline continues to gush money, tuition can soar . . . .” Too many people are ignorant of the connection.
The correlation between government facilitated tuition assistance in the forms of grants and loans, and the price of tuition and other costs of higher education is interestingly coherent and consistent with microeconomic theories describing the effect of subsidies.
Allowing student debt to be discharged through bankruptcy is not a viable option. The lenders will simply stop providing the money. The alternative would be to allow the lenders to make credit based decisions on who will receive the loans. We all know where that leads, and it isn’t good. If a student can just walk away from the debt after leaving college, where’s the incentives to even look for a job? Where is the incentive on the universities to contain tuition costs, because they charge/receive whatever amount and the student can walk away. Who cares if you charge $120k to learn a job that pays $40k?
As a system, the student loan scheme is perfect example of unintended consequences. Each element on it’s own serves a useful purpose to keep the system running efficiently, but employed together, they created an unsustainable mess that has damaged the financial stability of large amount of the population.
If lenders stop providing the money, that’s the pressure on colleges to reign in costs and provide degrees that are actually worth something. The incentive to look for a job is not having a bankruptcy on your credit report for the first 7 years of your post-college life. You didn’t need to murder all those words.
The bankruptcy fix, like every other fix, gets complicated. Lenders will still provide money because it’s guaranteed by the government. The incentive against bankruptcy is its impact on a person’s life, from the ability to obtain a loan or credit card to renting an apartment. But if 20 million students declare bankruptcy at once to avoid debt repayment, banks and businesses will have to accommodate them as they can’t afford to lose 20 million customers from the economy, and the stigma of bankruptcy will vanish if everyone is doing it. It will be a mess.
While I am not entirely unopposed to forgiving a modest amount of student loan debt, it must be accompanied by some kind of limitation on student borrowing and some limitation on rampant tuition price increases. Some states, in the wake of the financial crisis, decided to slash higher ed funding in order to make up for budget deficits, which resulted in yearly tuition increases that, over the course of 4 years, greatly decreased the value of a scholarship that a student had been awarded prior to starting their freshman year. I can sympathize with the notion that this is unfair to the students.
But I can’t blame the schools for this: the federal government continues to offer firehoses of money to universities in the current situation, and it’s not like most students can just say “not worth it anymore” and call it quits or easily transfer midway through college in the face of tuition increases. Any type of loan forgiveness, accompanied by nothing else, just incentivizes colleges to keep admitting more students and keep increasing tuition.