District of Maryland Judge Paula Xinis denied a motion to dismiss as to a school district’s “official” twitter “StaffPride” account. Why, you may wonder, would a school district have an official Pride account. That was at the heart of the matter.
In October 2022, the School Board announced the introduction of LGBTQIA+-themed books into the MCPS [Montgomery County Public Schools] curriculum. In response, several parents sought permission from MCPS for their children to “opt out” of any classroom instruction involving these books.
At first, it appeared that MCPS would permit this opt-out alternative. On March 22, 2023, MCPS confirmed that parents could choose to have their children read other material in lieu of the LGBTQIA+ books. But the next day, the School Board reversed course and informed parents that no such opt-out alternative would be available, nor would MCPS notify parents when classroom instruction would involve LGBTQIA+-themed materials.
Parents and pundits who thought the district’s action wrong sought to challenge the district’s denying them access to a school board meeting and being blocked by the school’s Pride twitter account. They lost the former, but prevailed as to the latter. The question that remains is why the Montgomery County school district would introduce LGBTQIA+-themed books at all. Had there previously been a mandate to introduce heterosexual themed books which needed undoing?
Assuming this has nothing to do with math or science, which may be a terribly wrong assumption, why not mandate that students read great literature without regard to sexuality?
But as dubious a choice as the Montgomery County school board made, it pales in comparison to the mandate of a new law in Louisiana.
In June, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, signed a bill mandating that all public school classrooms display a poster of the Ten Commandments. Just over a week later, Oklahoma’s State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters declared that “every teacher, every classroom in the state will have a Bible in the classroom and will be teaching from the Bible in the classroom,” later telling PBS News Hour, “the separation of church and state appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or Constitution.”
It’s true that the words “separation of church and state” appear nowhere in the Constitution. It’s also true that the First Amendment Establishment Clause prohibits this, and there’s no doubt given the Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Stone v. Graham. Are they worried that they will lose in court? No. No they are not.
“Look, there are people that don’t believe in our Constitution and we can post that on the walls,” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told Newsmax in June. “This is a document that has historical roots in our country’s foundations. The United States Supreme Court has recognized that.”
“If we get sued and we get challenged, we will be victorious,” Walters told PBS News Hour. “The Supreme Court justices [Donald Trump] appointed actually are originalists that look at the Constitution and not what some left-wing professor said about the Constitution.”
This is the depth of legal analysis that comes from sniffing one’s own farts. But I digress. Both teams have turned classrooms into a battleground for the hearts and minds of children. Both teams have introduced “subject matter” that has no place in the classroom under any circumstances.
Sure, reading and writing and ‘rithmatic may be a bit too simplistic to dictate the curriculum anymore, but the fact remains that students aren’t doing all that well with these core academic subjects. And yet, the concern isn’t whether Johnny can add two plus two and come up with four, but whether he can come up with anything at all.
One of the most potent arguments for extreme change is to “do it for the children.” Most of the time, it’s a logical fallacy, an appeal to emotion in order to divert attention from the wrongfulness of the “fix” the proponent is trying to sell. Nevertheless, I’m going to employ the mantra and contend that the unduly passionate on both sides keep their mitts off the kids and their noses out of the classroom. It’s deeply disturbing that we’re raising a generation of students who can recite dogma from memory but have never read Shakespeare or heard of an isosceles triangle.
It’s bad enough that putative adults are at war over their respective ideologies. But when these ideologies produce students graduating from public schools without the ability to read, write or solve simple math problems, we have failed them and failed ourselves. Take this battle to bias our babies out of the classroom. Do it for the children.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

As I understand it, the theory is that by exposing children to LGBT stories, they will see varying sexuality as being normal and equivalent, and thus will end discrimination. Whether this is how it pans out is another matter. Some of the books are overtly sexual. Sometimes, exposure results in feeding discrimination rather then reducing or eliminating it (think Scared Straight).
But that it’s being forced upon children is another matter. It is the responsibility of schools to educate students in academic subjects, not turn them into “good” people in accordance with the ideological preferences of the school board.
As for the introduction of religion, that’s just batshit crazy. But it’s not surprising that they believe the Supreme Court, post Dobbs, will give them whatever they want. I don’t want to believe it’s true, but time will tell.
New Jersey public schools have two court cases affirming the teaching of the 5 pillars of Islam and an introduction to Islam. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of La Plata High School in La Plata, Md Islamic curriculum that requires students to recite the Shahada. No idea where instructional teaching stops and religious indoctrination begins. You don’t know until you try.
There’s a huge difference between neutral objective teaching about a religion in a history or comparative religion class and requiring the 10 Commandments to be posted in every classroom and bible teaching by every teacher. Fudging the details doesn’t make this any harder.
[Ed. Note: It’s a slow day, so I’ll let this slide. Do not make a habit of it.]
It is uncommon but possible to teach the Bible as literature without promoting a particular sect. There are many if-then explanations for the results of typical human behavior contained therein that are illuminating. Not unlike much of our secular literature.
The problem is first that almost no one actually studies the Bible cover to cover, especially with real and intellectually neutral intent so almost any epithet hurled at its contents is accepted by whoever is of like mind. Second we have reached a point in our social discourse that measured, even gentle, exchanges of ideas about literature are shunned in favor of the much easier and more emotionally rewarding shouting at each other from our respective camps about thing of which we actually know very little.
If the intent of the legislation is to create and enforce a particular religious dogma then, in my opinion, it should be struck down. Bringing the Bible into education as literature could be the start of a complicated but possibly very rewarding trend.
In New Jersey, where I am a local school boad member, the State is mandating that all school policies have “gender inclusive” language, meaning you can no longer say “his” or “her,” “she” or “him.” You have to say either “their”, “they” or “them”, or avoid pronouns altogether. This is in policies that students will almost never have cause to read, and where 99.9% of the district (K-8) is cisgender. When I have objected to the ungrammatical and confusing language that results, I am told that all of the online dictionaries now say that these grammar rules no longer apply! It’s all very cultlike.
It seems like much of the support for LGBT-QIA is performative/ virtue signaling.
I bet if you asked these people what LGBT-QIA stood for you wouldn’t get a straight answer…
Yo know Hal, LGBT people are terrible at poker. They just can’t keep a straight face.
[Ed. Note: How can I say no to this?