Today is supposed to be the day. It’s been pumped. It’s been dumped. It “liberation day,” the day Americans will be liberated from their savings, their income, their food, cars and flat screen TVs. But such cheap goods aren’t part of the American Dream, according to billionaire Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
There will be pain, as renowned economics scholar Tommy Tuberville explains, but Americans will be happy to endure it for the sake of their president’s desires.
Before the election, Trump claimed that tariffs would be paid by foreign nations, or at least their manufacturers, to the United States, bringing us a windfall. Other rationales included stopping illegal immigration, Fentanyl* trafficking and bringing manufacturing back to the United States with well-paid jobs that would restore the working man to the middle class.
How would this happen? If goods manufactured outside the United States were to be subject to a tariff upon entering, the demand for the once-lower-now-higher-priced items would die, leaving an opportunity to manufacture here. Whether it was American owned startups or foreign owned factories on American soil didn’t matter, since either would need American workers and would have a huge American market open to them now that cheap foreign goods were no longer cheap. Where manufacturers once fled the high costs of the United States for cheaper labor markets elsewhere, they would now return to avoid the penalty of tariffs.
Is that how it will work? Not on this planet. Initially, there is the physics problem. Factories don’t spring up like magic from the beautiful American soil. They must be built. They require materials. They take time. They take investment of high interest rate money to construct. Businesses are reluctant to invest without stability so that they know the rules of the game won’t change tomorrow, making their investment worthless (or worth less, as the case may be). And even if they decide to put in the money and effort, it takes years before the factories are producing goods. During the interim years, everything will either cost more or we will have to do without. For years.
The second problem is that roads run both ways. To the extent the United States produces anything that anyone anywhere else wants to buy, our producers enjoy access to their markets as well as our own. We may enjoy Mexican avocados, but they enjoy our corn. We might be willing to live without avocado toast, but will our famers be good with having silos of corn rot for lack of export buyers? For years.
The third problem is that not all of us want to reimagine America as a third world country, and not just with regard to whisking randos off the streets, onto planes, and disappearing them in Salvadorean prisons. Are Americans willing to work for what apparel manufacturers pay for labor in southeast Asia? Hell, we won’t pick produce in the field, and we surely won’t make shirts for a dollar a day. Not only do we want a living wage, benefits, health care and paid maternity and paternity leave, but nobody is willing to die in another Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire.
That means many a clothing item made in America will cost what Lululemon’s do now, and Lulu’s will be double that since they’re currently made in Vietnam. But you’ll be working that cool new manufacturing job getting more than what you’re getting now? Cool, cool, except the price for everything you’re buying, or want to buy, now will be double as well.
Which brings us to the fourth problem, that high priced foreign goods does not mean American made goods will be any less expensive. If that Toyota Taco is increased by 25%, do you think that not-quite-all-American Ford F-150 isn’t going up as well? If you can’t buy a foreign pickup for less, there is no reason under the sun for American pickups to be sold for any less than their foreign tomodachi. And that’s assuming it would even be possible, given that we’re still paying UAW rates and pension costs, which already broke Detroit once.
The suffering that the president says you are happy to endure is theoretically to reach the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, an American manufacturing economy that can compete on a level playing field with the rest of the world. There will surely be suffering, but it is highly unlikely that there is a pot of gold at the end of the suffering. Indeed, there is no assurance when or if the suffering will end. Happy Liberation Day!
*Apparently, Trump plans to impose tariffs on Fentanyl, which will make it too expensive to import into the US. You can’t make this up.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Trump has been loudly trumpeting his support for IVF, but fentanyl is rather important for the egg retrieval part of the procedure (and many other surgeries). The needle used is about 12 inches long and *is not* inserted through the abdomen (I leave the route to reader’s imagination).
I can only guess that a domestic shortage of fentanyl due to the tariffs would be catastrophic. However, this must be part of Mr. Trump’s grand plan of liberation.
SHG.
100 marks for your expression of irony and Weapon of Mass Destruction Level sarcasm!!!!
Trump should be disappearing in a sheet of flame!!!!!
Where is Stalin when you need him? Now that man knew how to move some factories.
The F-150 wasn’t the best example since we’ve had a 25% tariff on foreign pickups since LBJ, or perhaps that was the point I missed.
In any case, that tariff worked really well to get other countries to change.
[Ed. Note: Not everyone will appreciate the chicken tax.]
Too bad Tesla is no longer an option – I heard they’re manufactured locally.
The Chicken Tax doesn’t apply to the Tacoma (or any other foreign truck) as long as it has rear passenger seating of some kind. That’s why all those old Mazda B-Series trucks from the 80s had those BS jump seats – they fulfilled the technical definition of rear seating, and so dodged the tax.
So I’m pretty sure there are no trucks sold these days that would get hit with the Chicken Tax.
The again, the CT is the reason we aren’t getting that electric Toyota Hilux. We just don’t get to have nice things.
You nailed it on the subject of clothing. At the same time the orange felon was speaking, my wife and I started checking the labels on the clothing we were wearing that very moment. My shirt and pants were made in Pakistan (58%) (I am now retired, so I dress very casually) and my wife’s shirt was made in Vietnam (90%). Her pants were from Malaysia (47%). The price to manufacture this clothing in the US would probably put the price at a level even higher than with the added tariffs. And too much to afford to buy new.
My favorite thing in all this is the tariffs he intends to impose of the value of fentanyl. I’m sure the smugglers who brought in the whole 46 pounds from last year from Canada will be sure to declare their goods to pay the tariffs.
“Save American jobs” has a reality problem. The first is there isn’t a job shortage problem, but there is a worker problem. My various governmental clients raised starting salaries for deputies, COs and others 25%, with few takers. The same is true for medicine, especially nurses. My clients aren’t alone.
The second is manufacturing, farming and textile production isn’t labor intensive. There aren’t a bunch of workers screwing bolts into a Ford V-6 or slapping plastic panels on a Chevy. That’s work for the machines, and it’s been true for decades. Why make that Ford with robots in China? To avoid the costs and regulations placed by the feds. Short people from South America don’t climb Swamp orange trees or crouch in tomato fields–there have been machines for that my whole, old life.
But I’m a bystander. My closet, which is really one of the extra bedrooms, has 113 shirts, 18 suits (lawyer blue, grey and brown) and 15 pairs of shoes. The truck has at least 100K of life left.
But God help them if they mess with my island rum. Then again, I can hop on over and capture a bunch.
[Ed. Note: There is no such thing as a brown lawyer suit.]