Susan Porter did what a lot of people do when they see something they support. Or don’t support. She honked her horn. She was cited for her action.

Plaintiff was cited for misuse of a vehicle horn under Section 27001 after she honked in support of protestors gathered outside a government official’s office. Although the citation was dismissed, Porter filed suit to block future enforcement of 27001 against any expressive horn use—including honks not only to “support candidates or causes” but also to “greet friends or neighbors, summon children or co-workers, or celebrate weddings or victories.” She asserted that Section 27001 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments as a content-based regulation that is not narrowly tailored to further a compelling government interest. Alternatively, she argued that even if the law is not content based, it burdens substantially more speech than necessary to protect legitimate government interests.

Continue reading →

Prefatory Note: I will refer to a couple of “laws” in this story. As my mean-ass editor has a policy of not making people stupider for reading SJ, I’ll go ahead and say I have no idea if these are actual laws or just shit people made up. It could be both.—CLS

We make it to the gate in Manchester, Connecticut. My wife, Dr. S, looks at the gate monitor, then her phone. She shoots me a worried look.

“I hope we make the connection in Philly.” Continue reading →

As raised in the debate over the Tennessee three or two, according to your accounting method, the underlying “cause” of the problem was legislators aiding protestors in gaining access to their legislative chambers, seizing effective control by standing up front, megaphone in hand, leading the protestors in chants and violating the rules, not to mention norms, of decorum.

Their conduct occurred after the shooting at the Covenant School, certainly a very traumatic event. Their conduct was directed toward the chamber’s consideration of laws that protected gun rights, rather than limited them, for which there was no law was before the lege. They were passionate about their cause, which they viewed as existential, life or death. Continue reading →

Ed. Note: Fault Lines alumni Mario Machado and Christopher Seaton, who will apparently fight with each other over anything, agreed to debate the following topic: Resolved: Tennessee’s House of Representatives was right to expel the “Tennessee Three.” Chris will take the affirmative and Mario will take the negative. Mario’s argument is below.

Tennessee State Reps. Justin Jones, and Justin Pearson have been expelled from the Tennessee House with Gloria Johnson surviving by one vote. The three are Democrats who had a major beef with what they perceive as inaction from their colleagues with regards to gun reform laws, following a shooting at the Covenant School in Nashville, where three children and three adults were killed. Continue reading →

Ed. Note: Fault Lines alumni Mario Machado and Christopher Seaton, who will apparently fight with each other over anything, agreed to debate the following topic: Resolved: Tennessee’s House of Representatives was right to expel the “Tennessee Three.” Chris will take the affirmative and Mario will take the negative. Chris’ argument is below.

If I’d like to believe one thing about the politicians in Nashville representing my home state, it’s that they’re naturally averse to using the deaths of schoolchildren for political gain. When others in the State House attempt it, a consequence of that behavior should be some form of discipline. That is why, despite the cries of “Racism” at the top of the unduly passionates’ lungs, I stand with Tennessee House Speaker Cameron Sexton and the Tennessee GOP’s attempts to expel Gloria Johnson, Justin Jones, and Justin Pearson—the so called “Tennessee Three.” Continue reading →

There were always leaks, to some very small extent. Whether the leaker was a whistleblower or just a leaker was often a matter of opinion, but there is little doubt that leaks have become far more common and far less justified on whistleblower basis, such as the Pentagon Papers revealing that the government had wasted thousands of lives on a lie. Instead, it’s spiraled down to the leaker’s belief that something isn’t right, or isn’t good, and he therefore isn’t bound by a sense of confidentiality. Or to put it differently, every person whose hands touch a national secret gets to decide for themselves whether they feel like keeping it.

This was manifest in 21-year-old Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Teixeira’s decision to put top secret documents online for, well, kicks. Continue reading →

Tucker Carlson was unceremoniously fired from Fox, which tells you how much Rupert Murdoch really wanted him out the door. Don Lemon was fired from CNN, but unless the two join hands for the new Hannity and Colmes, who cares? But as Fox’s top performer, what does Carlson’s tossing mean?

As an entertainer, Bret Stephens catalogues his fall from grace and where he might land. Continue reading →

The purpose of the announcement is to force Stanford Law School to capitulate to the demands of its Black Law Students Association. Or else what?

Stanford University’s Black Law Students Association will no longer help the university recruit black students after the law school’s dean, Jenny Martinez, apologized in early March to Fifth Circuit appellate judge Kyle Duncan.

Continue reading →

There aren’t many avenues available for those falsely accused of sexual misconduct, and since the glory days of #MeToo when a mere accusation was more than enough to destroy a person’s career, and possibly his life, even the limited options have been fraught with the potential to be ruinous. But California legislators have decided that one option, not great but at least available, should be taken off the table.

California lawmakers voted Thursday to protect sexual assault survivors from retaliatory lawsuits, years after a former state lawmaker sued a woman over her sexual misconduct allegations against him. Continue reading →

It was true of the dangerously wrongheaded excuse that black men are justified in resisting, fleeing and fighting with police because of a “reasonable” fear that the cops might kill them. And they end up being beaten, shot, maybe even killed, not for whatever the cause of the interaction was, but because of how they responded to the cops’ commands or efforts to take the person into custody.  It’s not that outrageously wrong police conduct doesn’t occur, but it remains an extreme outlier, happening in an infinitesimal percentage of cases. Unless the guy resists.

This is a panic. A fear born of hyping the extreme cases such that people internalize the false believe that the one in a million case is the norm. Continue reading →