Category Archives: Uncategorized

Biden Defies Gravity

It’s normal for the media to give a new president a “honeymoon,” a chance to get his house in order and establish a plan of what he hopes to accomplish and how he plans to do it. Granted, Trump never got a honeymoon, but then, he never had a plan and was given what he gave. Biden, however, is different again. He’s whirling and spinning, massive plans at massive costs justified by massive claims of massive problems.

And nobody in the media seems to seriously question any of it. Continue reading →

The Mystals Are Invited

Years ago, I went to a panel discussion held by Above the Law and sat next to Elie Mystal’s wife. Christine. She was great. Funny, smart, delightful, and far more fun than Elie. Not that Elie isn’t fun. He is. Not only is he one of the funniest guys I know, but comes up with these zingers that just leave me rolling on the floor.

Back when Elie was at ATL, and ATL still had comments, some of the jerks would beat on him mercilessly. He told he was tough enough to take it, but it pissed me off and I said so. I thought enough of Elie that back when I was doing Cross for Fault Lines, he was one of my targets. I liked Elie before it was cool. Continue reading →

Shake and Bake

Who’s the best known baker in America? Duff Goldman? That Buddy guy from Jersey? Or is it Jack Phillips? You remember Phillips, the owner of Colorado’s Masterpiece Cake Shop, who took his case to the Supreme Court when he refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple? He won, but not really, as the Court punted on the big issue of whether he could be compelled to bake a cake when its purchasers, its purpose, conflicted with his beliefs.

This gave rise to two problems. The first is that the issue raised by the case went unanswered. The second is that it left Phillips with a target on his back. Continue reading →

Short Take: Is Gideon Sexist?

Maybe the problem is that women don’t commit as many crimes as men, or are treated far more leniently than men in the system, but if a women is prosecuted for a crime, and lacks the ability to afford an attorney to represent her, Gideon has her covered as it does anyone in the criminal legal system. Fair? Not fair enough, as argued by Jessica Steinberg and Kathryn A. Sabbeth in their law review article, The Gender of Gideon.

This Article makes a simple claim that has been overlooked for decades and yet has enormous theoretical and practical significance: the constitutional guarantee of counsel adopted by the Supreme Court in Gideon v. Wainwright accrues largely to the benefit of men. Continue reading →

If “Hate Crimes” Were Bad, Why Not Double Hate Crimes?

It hasn’t been easy being an Asian American over the past decade, knowing that you’re expected to be an obsequious supporter of social justice as a marginalized minority while simultaneously being treated like dirt for working hard, doing well and ending the target of discrimination by the very passionate folks who demand your obedience.

As anti-Asian violence increased, it was hard to address since the perpetrators were mostly the same marginalized people who you were required to adore as they beat you, but you weren’t allowed to mention that it was black and brown guys beating old Asian people* because oppressed people can do no wrong and beating is reparations anyway. Let’s face it, Asians made them look bad, so how could they not be forgiven for beating Asians? Continue reading →

Tuesday Talk*: A Soldier’s Duty

The military has a problem.

Some troops have drawn equivalencies between the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and last year’s protests for racial justice during recent stand-downs to address extremism, worrying the military’s top enlisted leader.

In a Thursday briefing with reporters at the Pentagon, Ramón “CZ” Colón-López, the senior enlisted adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that some troops have asked, when the Jan. 6 riot is brought up, “How come you’re not looking at the situation that was going on in Seattle prior to that?”

Continue reading →

Mao’s Moment

Is there more to the Butterfly Theory than meets the eye of the logically challenged and intellectually dishonest? Jessica Valenti argues that the mass murder in Altanta confirms her priors about white men murdering women of color because of religion, as that’s the only tune she’s capable of playing. If neither facts nor logic play any role, and one is never pressed to actually show their work to back up their hysteria, aren’t they allowed “their truth”?

But the sudden concern for animus against Asians, which has yet to reach the inner sanctum of elite colleges refusing to admit curve-busting Asians based on their qualifications rather than let them take seats away from applicants who wouldn’t otherwise make the cut. has not only given rise to a new reason to blame white supremacy, even if most anti-Asian violence is committed by people who aren’t very white at all, but has sanitized criticism of a foreign nation. China, still communist after all these years, as the people of Hong Kong found out, is now off limits. Continue reading →

Debate: Grizzly Bears Love Eating The Rich and Famous

Ed. Note: Below is part two of the debate, with Miami criminal defense lawyer David Oscar Markus‘ response to Atlanta’s Andrew Fleischman’s post, In the Criminal Justice System, Wealth Is A Huge Advantage.

The criminal justice system crushes people.  Men and women.  Black and white.  Rich and poor.  A federal criminal case impacts your liberty, your family, your finances, your mental health, and every other aspect of your life whether you are rich or poor.  Each broad category of defendants faces their own hurdles in the system.  There is no question that poor defendants face enormous challenges in trying to mount an effective defense again a government with unlimited resources, what Andrew rightly calls “a bit like [fighting] a grizzly bear.”  There’s an unfortunate perception out there, however, that the governmental grizzly bear isn’t as interested in gobbling up the rich.  But that perception is wrong.  This particular bear loves plump and shiny prey.

Let me briefly explain some of the disadvantages that rich, well-known defendants face in the system: Continue reading →

Short Take: Dean Too Woke

Odd things happen at CUNY law school. There was the protest to silence Josh Blackman because of his presentation on free speech. Now the dean of the law school, Mary Lu Bilek, has been “canceled.” Except this time, she canceled herself.

The dean of the CUNY School of Law has decided to cancel herself — saying she is retiring in atonement for referring to herself as a “slaveholder” during a faculty meeting.

Continue reading →

Should Selective Service Be Less Selective?

Credence Clearwater Revival is going to have to change the lyrics to its 1969 song, Fortunate Son. The song was a condemnation of how the connected could avoid the draft, could avoid going to Vietnam, could avoid dying in Southeast Asia for a war they neither understood nor supported. But then, it was just boys who were drafted to fight.

Now, it’s just boys who, upon reaching their 18th year, have to register with Selective Services for the draft. No, we don’t have an active draft, but if needed, the mechanism exists. Male privilege reared its ugly head.

In 1981, in Rostker v. Goldberg, the Supreme Court rejected a sex-discrimination challenge to the registration requirement, reasoning that it was justified because women could not at that time serve in combat. Continue reading →