Naming Names

Very few names are so unique that you can’t find a few hundred, maybe even a few thousand, other nice people with the same name.  Sure, your name is special to you, but it’s equally special to everyone else who shares your name.  What it isn’t is a very good way to discern the identity of a criminal. 

That lesson should have been driven home the first time Fredericksburg, Virginia, police officers arrested Rodney Maurice Morton, about 13 years ago.  Or the second time, in December, 2007.  It shouldn’t have happened again the third time in February, 2008.  Crazy story, of course, but Rodney Morton never asked that he share a name with a fellow who happened to engage in a lot of bad stuff.

Rodney Maurice Morton, as opposed to Rodney Lee Morton, wasn’t exactly of a criminal bent.


Rodney Maurice Morton works for a national security agency of the federal government, has a security clearance and no criminal record, court records state.

He does, unfortunately, have numerous arrests, all eventually dismissed.  He’s had to endure his daughter being called by police looking for him to arrest him.  That surely wasn’t pleasant, any more than being taken away in cuffs and locked up, but it was nothing compared with the next exposure to law enforcement.



But on May 1 of last year, King George deputies surrounded Morton’s house and informed him he’d been charged with selling cocaine to an undercover officer in Fredericksburg on March 5.

A city grand jury indicted Rodney Maurice Morton, but a judge dismissed that charge on June 2, 2008, after it was determined that Rodney Lee Morton was again the intended defendant.
In case you didn’t notice, Morton was indicted for the alleged crime of his namesake and it took a month for the system to figure out that it had the wrong Rodney.  Again. 

The experience of being arrested, cuffed, booked, held and arraigned isn’t a pleasant one under the best of circumstances.  It’s absolutely shocking to the system of an innocent person who has been wrongly accused.  Imagine what it must feel like to a person who is not merely innocent, but wrongly identified.  Imagine what it must feel like the second time.  Or third,

Given the advances in technology and communication, it seems almost impossible that police could screw up in ways such as this.  Of course, given the frequency of search warrant executions on the wrong address, merely arresting the wrong person because he has a similar name hardly seems so terrible.  Still, the police would have us believe that they know what they’re doing, that they are capable and competent, the “new professionals” as Justice Scalia calls them.

Basic, low-rent screw ups like this must serve to remind us that the assertions of law enforcement, are not, per se, reliable.  They just aren’t that smart, aren’t that good, aren’t that trustworthy.  They get it wrong all the time.  No, not always, and not in the entirety, but wrong nonetheless.  And screw-ups result in misery for regular people.  Sometimes death.  Sometimes decades in prison for the wrong person.  And the cops (and prosecutors) are invariably certain that they are right, and were right all along, until they are proven wrong.  Even then, they do everything in their power to smear the victim and justify their screw-up.

But they can’t smear Rodney Maurice Morton.  He’s clean as a whistle, security clearance and all.  They can make him miserable, disrupt his life and cost him a bundle to defend himself from their screw-ups.  But they can’t shift the blame on him.

Of course, not all of us work for a national security agency and have security clearance.  Just pray that one of the thousands of people who share your name doesn’t do anything nasty.  It might not be so easy for you to persuade the judge that its some other guy who did the deed. 

H/T Injustice Everywhere


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Naming Names

  1. Marly

    Did you know there is a Jim Smith society? There are so many of them they decided to get together on a regular basis. After reading your post, now I’m wondering if they did it as a way of keeping an eye on each other. Trying to keep them all in line!

  2. Thomas R. Griffith

    Sir, this is a perfect example of being “Not Guilty” (Not – in no way; to no degree). It also explains the number one reason as to why the Grand Jury process is a farce.

    The G.J’s. build a rapport with ADA’s due to seeing them on a daily basis. They go in and/or end up believing that they always have a good case. The rapport is extended to the police as seen in the overwhelming refusal to indict despite video footage & hospital bills of those beat down.

    Can anyone explain why and provide the rule, etc.., that provides the ADA’s the opportunity to try cases before G.J’s. without the defense team being present? And why they are allowed to do so even when the accused doesn’t have an attorney / lawyer? Thanks,

Comments are closed.