Some of us have been critical in the past of the Transportation Safety Administrations reactive measures to assure that airline passengers arrive safely at their destination. It was as if 9/11 would never happen again, failing first to appreciate the imaginative Richard Reid and his shoe bomb, and now, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, with high explosive sewn into his clothing.
But there was no hand-wringing or recriminations at the TSA this time. They moved forward decisively with immediate remedies to close the gaping loopholes that are always made painfully obvious after the fact. Within a mere 24 hours of the near-tragedy, the New York Times disclosed some of the changes:
But there was no hand-wringing or recriminations at the TSA this time. They moved forward decisively with immediate remedies to close the gaping loopholes that are always made painfully obvious after the fact. Within a mere 24 hours of the near-tragedy, the New York Times disclosed some of the changes:
The government was vague about the steps it was taking, saying that it wanted the security experience to be “unpredictable” and that passengers would not find the same measures at every airport — a prospect that may upset airlines and travelers alike.
Upset the foolish or not, this is a critical aspect of passenger safety, tricking would-be terrorists by having no safety measures in effect at certain airports to befuddle the overly prepared.
But several airlines released detailed information about the restrictions, saying that passengers on international flights coming to the United States will apparently have to remain in their seats for the last hour of a flight without any personal items on their laps. It was not clear how often the rule would affect domestic flights.
Overseas passengers will be restricted to only one carry-on item, and domestic passengers will probably face longer security lines. That was already the case in some airports Saturday, in the United States and overseas.
Some have questioned this “knee-jerk” response by the TSA, reflecting their own lack of understanding of how real safety works and how the too-real threat to our national security must be stopped, merely because these restrictions bear no cognizable relationship to Abdulmutallab conduct. These critics, of course, lack inside knowledge both of the ways terrorists operate and how these restrictions fit with the TSA plans for the future.
Initially, it is well known that acts of terrorism will only occur after the individual terrorist has purged his bowels. If not, then there could be massive humiliation, both to the cause and the terrorist’s mourning family, if the subsequent description says that he messed himself. By not allowing a potential terrorist to go to the lavatory, a fundamental necessity in all terrorist plans will be eliminated, thus making it impossible for the seated terrorists, such as Abdulmutallab, to proceed with their plan. Bet you didn’t think of that, Mr. Critical, did you?
Another fact, well-known to security insiders, is that terrorists are fashion plates, and will not go anywhere without at least two carry-ons to assure that they are properly attired when meeting virgins. One never knows exactly how one should dress in advance of the moment, particularly when it comes to weather conditions aboard the plane. By limiting hand baggage to only one, the TSA seeks to create fashion paralysis, a major stumbling block to any would-be terrorist’s moment of truth.
But these are just the immediate rule changes, designed to prepare us for the major ones to be imposed. In the future, passengers will be required to fly naked. As they ramp up the advertising campaign, No Shoes, No Clothes, No Problems, they have come upon a solution that will put an end to the fear of airline attacks.
To the untrained eye, one might suspect that the purpose behind this rule is to eliminate any place to secrete an explosive device. To those of us more attuned to the harsh realities of terror, we know this to be false. The true purpose behind this change is to create an atmosphere of such utter, nauseating disgust that it will be impossible for anyone to function.
Think about the people you see on airplanes. Then imagine what they would look like naked. Eeeew. That’s right, fat, old, wrinkled, smelly bodies surrounding you. Not a muscle would flex on board, fearing that they might touch someone’s sagging fleshiness. Every muscle would go limp. Minds would shut down. Aside from the occasional retching, there would be utter silence as people froze in place to avoid any possibility of human contact. You can’t bring down an airplane with your eyes tightly shut.
Some might argue that this is too cruel to contemplate, and indeed, it is extreme. But when it comes to the safety of Americans, there is no restriction that goes too far. We must be able to travel safely, without fear of harm. When it comes to protecting Americans, what better weapon do we have in the War on Terrorism than ourselves?
Update: Randy Barnett at VC has posted the new “temporary” TSA Rules, applicable until December 30th. Most notably amongst them is airlines are required to have their gate agents:
Perform thorough pat-down of all passengers at boarding gate prior to boarding, concentrating on upper legs and torso.As if these harried, sometimes a little nutsy, gate agents don’t have enough on their hands, they must now frisk every passenger before boarding. They aren’t trained to do so. They have no security available if they find something. There will be men frisking the upper thighs of women, and vice versa. There will be no screening available for further investigation. And let’s hope nobody has a catheter.
The good news is that they won’t be required to do this if the passenger happens to be a Monarch or Head of State. It’s not like the TSA is unreasonable about it.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Did I ever tell you about the time I got on a plane and, on my way back to steerage, realized just passed Seal and Heidi Klum as I walked through first class?
Great. Thanks, blow my whole premise right off the top. But who were they sitting next to, huh?
And don’t think I didn’t notice that you’ve got Crime and Consequences on you blog recommendations, but not SJ. No wonder Heidi Klum didn’t sit with you.
The TSA and the airlines, like the rest of us, don’t know what can be done to reduce the possibility of a terrorist getting a bomb on an airplane to zero. And when something like this latest attempt happens, it’s politically necessary that they Do Something, just like after 911, the authorities Did Something by stationing National Guard folks with unloaded rifles and no ammunition on them in airports. It wasn’t because they expected that the guardsmen would be clubbing terrorists with the butts of their rifles; it was to tell the public that they were Doing Something.
So they’re Doing Something, and hoping it will reassure people enough so that airline travel won’t take a bigger hit than it would. Yup; it’s security theater, and they’re hoping that enough of the audience will be reassured by the performance.
It’s easy to mock them — I certainly do — but they didn’t create the political necessity that they Do Something, even if there’s nothing useful that they can do. (I don’t think there’s any reason to think that Jasper Schuringa jumped out of his seat and started beating on the bomber because of anything the TSA had told him to do. And, like the Richard Reid attempt, apparently the only reason that the bomb didn’t go off was the fortunate incompetence of the bomber or bomb maker.)
Scott, You are trying to scare us with phantoms of lost liberty! Unsightly naked passengers will not be a problem when all airline passengers are shackled and hooded for the entire trip!
I suspect that people are beginning to catch on to the act, and it’s getting a little old.
Addendum: I just saw this in a comment over at Orin Kerr’s post, from Nate Silver :
Just the numbers.