250 And Counting

This press release was received yesterday from the Innocence Project. 


In 250th DNA Exoneration Nationwide, New York Man Is Proven Innocent 33 Years After Wrongful Conviction for Rape


Innocence Project releases report detailing all 250 exoneration cases and outlining causes of wrongful convictions

(NEW YORK, NY; Thursday, February 4, 2010) – A Rochester, New York, man who was wrongfully convicted of rape 33 years ago is being exonerated with DNA testing today, in what the Innocence Project said is the 250th DNA exoneration in the United States.

Freddie Peacock, 60, was convicted of rape in December 1976. He was sentenced to up to 20 years in prison and released on parole in 1982. He tried to remain on parole because he thought he would never be able to clear his name if he was released from state supervision. For the last 28 years since he left prison, he has fought to prove his innocence even though he was no longer incarcerated.

“Freddie Peacock was released many years ago, but he hasn’t been truly free because the cloud of this conviction hung over him,” said Olga Akselrod, the Innocence Project Staff Attorney handling the case. The Innocence Project is affiliated with Cardozo School of Law. “Nobody in the U.S. who was exonerated with DNA testing has spent this many years outside of prison fighting to prove his innocence. Today, the decades-long nightmare that Freddie Peacock and his family have endured is finally over.”

The Innocence Project released a report today, “250 Exonerated: Too Many Wrongfully Convicted,” which details each one of the exoneration cases and includes statistics on common causes of the wrongful convictions.

Among the report’s key findings:


• There have been DNA exonerations in 33 states and the District of Columbia.

• The top three states for DNA exonerations are New York (with 25), Texas (with 40) and Illinois (with 29).

• 76% of the wrongful convictions involved eyewitness misidentification.

• 50% involved unvalidated or improper forensic science.

• 27% relied on a false confession, admission or guilty plea.

• 70% of the 250 people exonerated are people of color (60% are black; nearly 9% are Latino; 29% are white).

“These DNA exonerations show us how the criminal justice system is flawed and how it can be fixed,” said Peter Neufeld, Co-Director of the Innocence Project. “DNA exonerations have helped transform the criminal justice system, leading to reforms in virtually every state, but there is still a great deal of work to do to make our system of justice more fair, accurate and reliable.”

The first DNA exoneration in the United States was in 1989. “We never imagined when we started the Innocence Project in 1992 that so many people around the country would be freed with DNA testing,” Neufeld said. “It’s important to remember that DNA exonerations do not solve the problem – they provide scientific proof of its existence, and they illuminate the need for reform.”


Cases involving DNA are negligible, compared with those where no DNA is involved and yet convictions are obtained based upon the same flawed evidence, eyewitness misidentification, junk science and false confessions.  No platitudes about how wonderful our system of justice is can overcome the fact that we continue to convict with bad evidence.  Full prisons, and felons tainted for life, are its legacy.

The Innocence Project has done extraordinary work in freeing the innocent through DNA exonerations.  But it’s not enough. 


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “250 And Counting

  1. PrisonMovement

    Just a few words: TEXAS, Todd Willingham, & soon, Hank Skinner.

    “These DNA exonerations show us how the criminal justice system is flawed and how it can be fixed,” said Peter Neufeld, Co-Director of the Innocence Project. “DNA exonerations have helped transform the criminal justice system, leading to reforms in virtually every state, but there is still a great deal of work to do to make our system of justice more fair, accurate and reliable.”

    Absolutely…thanks for posting!

  2. Thomas R. Griffith

    Sir, You are dead-on about it not being enough. Thanks for saying what others and I have been thinking all along. As you know, currently only a handful of students are targeting certain States in hopes that DNA holds the answers to specific wrongful convictions. A couple of District Attorneys have created (in house) Conviction Integrity Units but also rely mostly on DNA and all require the applicants to be incarcerated. Maybe now with Mr. Peacock, they’ll continue to address closed cases and include non-DNA as well & spawn a new direction.

    While a few of the 250 mentioned in the Post are non-DNA cases, it’s just not enough considering how many law schools & D. As. Offices are scattered across the U. S. With that, I was happy to learn that on Nov. 09, via: Crim Prof Blog, that Ohio created a “Public Defender’s Wrongful Conviction Project.” Despite being (in house) it will only target non-DNA cases.

    If & when the three major areas of the Report’s – Key Findings are finally addressed (closed & open cases alike), the 250 will look and seem dismal in comparison. *Congratulations to those that fought on Mr. Peacock’s behalf & I pray he can finally allow the healing to begin. I await your future Posts re: #251 & beyond. Thanks.

Comments are closed.