Perhaps some of the younger, more computer savvy, lawyers are aware of, even familiar with, current trends in computer forensics. I’m not, so I turn to an expert. It’s far too easy, when seeking the aid of someone with expertise you lack, to be sucked into a sense of security via the use of meaningless jargon. It’s even easier when you’re busy, or desperate, or clueless.
For this reason, I commend Larry Daniel’s blog, ExForensic. Full disclosure: Larry is the guy I use for my digital forensics. He tells me what’s real rather than what I want to hear. Sometimes I ask him twice just to make sure, and he still won’t tell me what I want to hear. That’s why I pay him.
One of the things Larry has long fought against is scams by those who pretend to be digital forensics experts, but are nothing more than liars with a program. To this end, Larry has offered some computer-stuff background for lawyers so that they can have a clue what they’re getting into and avoid, if at all possible, being taken for a ride and destroying their client’s case in the process.
Today, Larry posts about Forensic File Formats — A Primer for Attorneys. I know! I could barely contain my excitement too. Still, these are the nuts and bolts of dealing with any case involving computers. Larry’s even included a funny picture, which I won’t copy here and steal Larry’s thunder.
Go take a look. If your practice includes charges involving computers, then you really need to be adequately versed in computer forensics, and have a trustworthy expert available to you. There’s no way around it.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The failure to collect from the client and hire a forensics expert when indicated is malpractice. Ask the client for the money, in writing, to cover yourself. Then hire the best you can find.