It would have been bad enough, no, horrible enough, had this just been another utterly needless tragedy of over-armed cops using all their toys to protect themselves first, to accomplish with excess force what they could have easily accomplished safely, that ended in the death of 7-year-old Aiyana Jones in Detroit.
But no, that failed to explain what really happened. Via CBS Detroit :
Jurors in the trial of a Detroit police officer charged with involuntary manslaughter in the death of a 7-year-old girl watched a video Tuesday of the police raid that led to the fatal shooting.The shot that killed Aiyana Stanley-Jones in 2010 could be heard on the video, which was recorded by a crew from “The First 48,” a reality TV show on A&E Networks. Officer Joseph Weekley’s gun fired and struck the girl in the head while she slept on a couch.
It wasn’t just for the testosterone rush that Weekley carried a submachine gun into the house, but for the cameras. So you could watch some cool show about the heroic work of law enforcement. Here’s what you could have seen:
And this is the face of the young human being on the other end of that gunshot.
The family photo is not just one of a lovely little girl, but of an irony that can’t be manufactured. Notice the faces in the background, the Disney characters of beautiful fantasy females that young girls adore? If any one of them had been shot in the head in her sleep during a nighttime police raid, you would be bombarded with news about it. How many have heard of Aiyana? It happened over three years ago, but a dead 7-year-old in Detroit doesn’t get the airplay of a Jodi Arias. At best, it’s worth A&E, not the networks. Cable has too much time to fill with cheap content.
A witness, Sgt. Robert Malone, explained the process. Note in particular the language, the heroic police jargon that captures hearts and minds on cable TV shows and makes police officers feel brave, valued and manly.
“Generally when we do entries, there is a lot of yelling. You generally hear a lot of ‘Police, police, police. Get down, get down. Police, police,” but it was a little more frantic than normal. I heard a lot of screaming that wasn’t typical of a normal entry,” he said.
Weekley was the first officer through the door — “the tip of the spear” — assistant prosecutor Rob Moran said in his opening statement to the jury.
“The flash grenade goes off: Boom!” Moran said. “He stands there. This is called the fatal funnel. You never stand in a doorway. Three seconds after the flash grenade detonates, his gun goes off and that’s when the fatal shot is fired.”
The idea behind all this is to disorient the occupants of the house, to cause momentary confusion so they can’t process what’s happening until the police have overwhelmed them with shock and awesomeness. It looks great on TV, reminding viewer what a spectacular job the police are doing protecting them from the vicious criminals, even if they turn out to be 7-year-old girls, and that they better not screw with the cops or their home could be the next one on camera.
Yet, this scenario ends up with an unanticipated outtake. You see, it was meant to show greatness, and nobody planned on its showing the killing of a child. “Cut,” the director would yell, but there was no stopping reality TV. A dead child was as real as it gets.
Homicide investigator LaTonya Brooks testified that detectives didn’t want the TV crew at the scene. Fishman said police department officials never asked officers if they wanted cameras following them with people asking “dumb questions.”
“That’s additional pressure to doing a pressure-filled, difficult job, wouldn’t you agree?” Fishman said.
“I agree,” Brooks said.
Cameras. Pressure. Dumb questions.
Malone, like Brooks, testified he would have preferred not being “miked up” and having cameras tagging along taping their every move.
“I just know that, again, it’s distracting and it was a serious event that we were getting ready to undertake. So, I disagreed with it 100 percent tactically. I don’t think that we needed distractions,” he said.
When it goes clean, meaning they use all the toys but only kill a dog or two, and not a child, however, they get to play hero on the telly. Gather the family, gather the team, let’s watch ourselves be awesome cops on cable.
Except whether they are “miked up” or not, they are still holding guns in their hands, and those guns have real bullets in them, and they are aimed at real human beings. The type who can die when struck by real bullets from their real guns. The people holding those guns can’t blame the TV cameras for pulling the trigger. Being on camera doesn’t mean you’re excused for killing people.
The idea that Weekley, who vomited right after realizing that he had just shot a child, was horrified by what he did reflects that the shooting was accidental. He didn’t mean to pull the trigger. Nobody wanted to kill anyone that night. But the problem remains that when you carry a submachine gun on a raid, people sometimes get killed. Sometimes, the person will be a little girl.
While there is plenty of blame for this killing to spread around, from the people who conceived this particular raid to the people who decided that cops need special weapons and tactics so they can rush in with grenades rather than wait out a person under safe and nonviolent conditions, it’s hard to lay blame for Aiyana’s death on the cameras or mikes.
But what the TV crew can be blamed for is their reflection in our sickness at wanting to watch the police do things like this to people, creating a television-worthy show of force. What remains a question is whether the reality show, had the cameras captured the actual shooting of this beautiful child, would have aired it.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Distracting to the police officers or not – why a warrant would authorize non-government, non-investigative actors to violate the privacy of a house is a bit of a mystery.
On the flip side, I wonder if it had not been for the tv crew, there would be a manslaughter charge. Seven year olds are said to make threatening gestures, run into the path of bullets, grab guns or be ninjas.
Good point. Even a 7-year-old can be a righteous shoot, if no one is watching.
I’ll bet he regrets not yelling “Stop resisting!” as he ran through the door.
I can’t go there. I’m sure this is terrible for him. Just not nearly as terrible as it is for the child and her family. But that’s what comes of SWAT raids and submachine guns. Bullets fire by accident. People die from bullets. That’s how it works, and they need to give a damn before they kill a child.
Bullets don’t fire by accident. Bullets fire when triggers are pulled. Triggers get pulled because somebody has a finger on the trigger. If you’re not intending to shoot whatever it is the muzzle of your gun is pointing at, then your finger should not be on the trigger. This is Gun Safety 101. It’s not a difficult class, either; just about everybody can get a A.
I understand there are a lot of cops who couldn’t shoot and hit the broad side of a barn even if they were standing inside it, but I simply cannot believe that a SWAT team hasn’t been trained in basic gun handling. This guy had to have gone through a door with his finger on the trigger of his weapon. That’s at least negligent. I would personally call it reckless, but that might be due to my early training. Either way, I don’t have much sympathy for the guy.
You know why his finger was on the trigger. The First Rule of Policing trumps the first rule of gun safety.
Possibly so. If that’s the case then I would upgrade this to an intentional homicide.
Sorry if I sound hard-assed about this, but I started learning to shoot at age 2. Gun safety looms rather large in my world, and if I could be taught how to be safe as a toddler then I see no reason why adults can’t be.
I understand and demur.
I cannot be the only person who thinks Officer Weekley, who is hardly blameless, was offered up as a scapegoat in a trial the prosecutor doesn’t really think she’s going to win. Why the guy in the front instead of the people who created all the risk? Because actually pulling the trigger is so much worse than planning the disaster probably to happen? The Michigan prisons are full of people who were convicted because someone else in the crew pulled a trigger, and the courts expressly dismissed any argument that the convicted defendant didn’t and couldn’t anticipate the shooting.
If you want to extend the theory, go all the way back to whoever came up with the idea of SWAT teams to perform garden variety busts and searches.
Ultimately, Daryl Gates.
Damn shame for sure! There is no need for a young child to be killed in the name of “law enforcement”. This was a gross neglect of proper policy and procedure. You are absolutely right! If this was a young white child from the suburbs, there would be outrage!! This is also a shameful statement about our society.
It doesn’t matter what his reasoning was, he had to have violated two separate rules of gun safety.
First, Detroit SWAT carries H&K MP5s or a variant. The MP5 has a selective fire safety with three positions, typically “Safe”, “Semiauto”, and “3-Round Burst” (or “Full Auto”). The rule is that you leave the safety in the “Safe” position until you are ready to pull the trigger. Period. He went into the house with the safety in the Semi position.
Second, you keep your finger off of the trigger until you are ready to fire. This was not an accidental discharge, it was a negligent discharge.
It takes no extra time to flip the safety, put your finger on the trigger and pull. I could regularly get off a round using the proper procedure in the same time as I could by taking the intentional shortcuts that Weekley took.
There is no doubt in my mind that he was grossly negligent, and it has nothing to do with the TV crew. It comes from the military mindset that we are training into our police.
But you don’t understand the pressures of the job, the difficulty of putting one’s life on the line to protect others.
Oh wait. You do.
I would like to say something about the last statement if the tv crew had caught the actual shooting if they would have aired it. I would bet a ton of money that they would have love to air that, then Aiyana’s death would have gotten so much more press. I’m also positive as soon as it aired people would have screamed for it to be taken off cause who wants to watch the death of a small innocent child by a police officer.
Radley Balko covered this from the beginning and I am glad to read more about this since it actually made it to court. There were serious questions in the beginning when this story first broke that the footage was “lost” or “accidentally deleted” (you can search the old agitator site for Aiyana). I am glad they were able to “track the footage down”… The people who make these shows are complete bootlickers and only get to ride along and wear cool tactical vests because they are propagandists for the police. If the police tell them “don’t show this” or “delete this” they will do it, no questions asked. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be filming the next raid. There was never a question about whether A&E wanted to show it, because it was never up to them.