For A Housewife, Things Just Got Very “Real”

If you’ve never seen Real Housewives of New Jersey, consider yourself fortunate. I’m not so lucky, having been introduced to this exercise in narcissism, banality and stupidity by a woman who lives in my home who shall not be named. But that’s my problem.

One of the stars of the Bravo “reality” series is Teresa Giudice, who also did a stint on Trump’s Celebrity Apprentice, when they were apparently unable to get anyone who was relatively interesting to appear. Why they have turned a woman whose most alluring virtues are her ill-tempered demeanor, poor grasp of language and low-class self-indulgence into a television personality is a mystery, but it reflects the current aspiration that anybody, no matter how devoid of talent, can be a celebrity these days.

The flip side of desperately seeking attention is that you actually get some attention, though from unwanted sources. For Giudice and her husband Joe, that attention came from the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey.

The Giudices were charged Monday in a 39-count indictment with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, making false statements on loan applications and bankruptcy fraud, according to the indictment.

The fraud was allegedly committed between September 2001 and September 2008. During that time, Teresa and Joe, of Towaco, N.J., allegedly submitted fraudulent mortgage and loan applications. For example, in September 2001 she applied for a $121,500 mortgage loan by falsely claiming she was an executive assistant and submitted fake W-2 forms and fake paystubs.

Sadly, thought not surprisingly, this isn’t the first time they’ve been told to sit on the wrong side of the courtroom.

Teresa and Joe are also accused of hiding their assets during their 2009 bankruptcy petition. They filed for Chapter 7 in October 2009 and allegedly failed to disclose accurate information about their businesses, rental properties and Teresa’s “Real Housewives” salary.

In addition, Joe failed to file tax returns from 2004 through 2008, even though his income topped $990,000.

The hubris associated with not disclosing one’s television salary is pretty startling. So you appear on television, even a show as flaky and offensive as Real Housewives, yet think nobody notices you neglected to mention that salary? As prosecutors like to say, defendants are presumed innocent, not intelligent.

“The privilege of living well in the United States carries certain real responsibilities, including filing tax returns when required and paying the correct amount of tax,” said Shantelle P. Kitchen, special agent in charge of the IRS-Criminal Investigation’s Newark Field Office. “Today’s indictment alleges the Giudices did not live up to their responsibilities by failing to file tax returns, falsifying loan applications and concealing assets in their bankruptcy petition. The reality is that this type of criminal conduct will not go undetected and individuals who engage in this type of financial fraud should know they will be held accountable.”

Given the defendant’s profile, whether warranted or not, you can bet the decision to indict wasn’t made lightly, and the U.S. Attorney made very sure that the matter won’t end up embarrassing the office by a failure of proof. One would expect that this prosecution, as most high profile cases, includes a “send a message” component that leaves the government with no room for a screw-up. After all, if Teresa and Joe Giudice walk on a 39 count indictment, the message sent will be that the government is more of a screw-up than they are, and you can bet the government has no plan to let that happen.

Yet, Teresa’s ability to rationalize has yet to be impacted by this minor detail in her life as a television star. Following announcement of the indictment, Teresa went straight to the font of legal wisdom to offer her defense:

Teresa sent a statement to “Entertainment Online” regarding the charges.

“Today is a most difficult day for our family. I support Joe and, as a wonderful husband and father, I know he wants only the best for our lovely daughters and me,” she said. “I am committed to my family and intend to maintain our lives in the best way possible, which includes continuing my career. As a result, I am hopeful that we will resolve this matter with the Government as quickly as possible.”

Continue her career?  No need to give her the Third Degree. Not even the Reid Technique. Or read her Miranda Warnings. Put her in front of a camera and she’ll spill her guts all over the place. She may have the right to remain silent, but as anyone who has watched this show knows, she lacks the ability.

Regardless of whether you’re a fan of “Real Housewives” or, like me, not so much, it has now gone into territory that is has enormous potential to be instructive to a lot of people whose interest and concern about the law tends to be, how shall I say it, limited.  But one thing is sure, that this real housewife is about to learn the meaning of real in a federal courthouse, where the assistant handling her prosecution isn’t likely to ask for her autograph on anything other than a plea agreement.


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

16 thoughts on “For A Housewife, Things Just Got Very “Real”

  1. John Burgess

    I’m beginning to see a whole new series of reality TV shows… “The Real Housewives of County Lockup”, “The Real Housewives in the State Pen”, “The Real Housewives of FCI Danbury”. Of course, the focus couldn’t be on just your ordinary criminal, you’d have to find those with charisma (as defined by reality TV). I’m confident that the various DOCs would be happy to assist for a small kickback service fee.

    1. SHG Post author

      I was going to close with something of this sort, but decided that there was a slight chance it would get back to somebody at Bravo and they would actually do it. I couldn’t live with myself if that happened.

      1. John Burgess

        I’ve a son who makes his living in reality TV. This may color my view of the genre. No, actually, it does. As he shares your view about not making people more stupid, I consider reality TV to be a mostly harmless amusement.

        Besides, he got his first job within three months of graduation and hasn’t looked back. It supports his other habits, like writing novels, so who am I to complain?

        1. SHG Post author

          I considered reality TV harmless amusement too until they started with those Ink shows, and Jersey Shore, and then Breaking Amish, and then Duck Dynasty, and then Tattoo Nightmares, and then Bridalplasty, and…well, now it’s not so amusing when I turn on the TV and 697 channels are all reality TV shows.

  2. Ken Bellone

    Obviously, she’s never read or watched the news. Survivor, which is credited with this low-cost reality craze, saw its very first winner, Richard Hatch, go to Club Fed for not paying taxes on his $1M prize. Some people will never grasp the point that the nail that sticks out will almost always get hammered.

    1. SHG Post author

      You could have stopped at “obviously, she’s never read or watched the news.” She may now, but only to watch herself on it.

  3. Chris Campbell

    “….having been introduced to this exercise in narcissism, banality and stupidity by a woman who lives in my home who shall not be named. But that’s my problem.”

    Yours too? I feel like we’re brethren now.

  4. Jerri Lynn Ward

    Ok. I have recently become a bit obsessed with this show. I am an old maid lawyer who stumbled upon it and got hooked for 2 reasons. One, I wondered whether married people were like this. Two, I wondered whether Yankees were like this. (I’m a Texan). After reading this post, I am now most worried about their little girls.

  5. Rob Robertson

    I saw media coverage of this yesterday. It has been reported that Joe is an Italian citizen. Income tax evasion, if he’s convicted, is an aggravated felony for immigration purposes. He’s facing some real trouble. I don’t think that the “real housewives of Pisa” gets the same kind of ratings…..

    1. SHG Post author

      Joe or Giuseppe? Though I would hate for this to feed into knee-jerk immigrant hatred, it’s particularly ironic in this case given that the allegations relating to the enjoyment of bankruptcy protection while falsely reporting.

  6. Jake DiMare

    Yup, so a couple of morons from New Jersey lie on a loan application and they’re indicted. The banks cripple our economy with billions in fraudulent mortgages and investments and they get bailouts, bonuses, and a raise.

    1. SHG Post author

      Why yes. That’s correct. So if there is any story involving a bank ever again in the history of mankind, please point this out so that you can make everyone as astute as you no matter what the topic of the post might be. As long as a bank is mentioned, it is critical that you make this clear.

          1. Jake

            I liked the ad hominem response you deleted better.

            My point, which I didn’t think I would have to spell out, is I think it is ironic the mortgage industry is pursuing high profile fraud cases.

            I suppose you could disagree that it is ironic, or just not care, or simply get off being rude to new readers commenting on your blog. In any case, I appreciate the attention.

Comments are closed.