But For Video: Dads And Cops

Each story has its own variations, each of which give rise to significant issues of their own, but share a few primary things in common. They involve men who were not alleged to have committed any crime, provided you’re not of the misguided view that failure to comply with the unlawful demands of police for identification is close enough. And they were caught on video.*

The first comes from Broward County, where Deputy James Cady demands that Allen Floyd, holding his child, show identification.

Deputy Cady, no stranger to costly complaints for false arrest, wasn’t putting up with Floyd’s polite response. And notably, his partner, Deputy Debbra Bridgman, was not only fully supportive, but studiously omitted Cady’s involvement when writing up the report.

Deputy James Cady confronts Allen Floyd, an African-American father calmly holding his infant, angrily drops f-bombs and calls Floyd “boy” before appearing to grab Floyd by the throat.

Floyd wasn’t under investigation for any crime. Nor was he being belligerent towards Cady in the video from July 25, 2017.

Floyd wasn’t concealing his identity, but exercised his right not to “show his papers” upon demand.

Finally, after Floyd shakes his head at Cady, Cady says, “OK, fine, I’m going to take her to jail because she’s got a warrant and I’m going to call child services on this kid!” When Floyd starts to say something, Cady says, “Quit f—– with me, boy! You hear me? Get your ID! Now!”

Bridgman’s voice chimes in, “ID!”

The putative argument for Cady’s actions was to determine that Floyd was the father of the child, which might make sense had that been in question, as he was arresting the child’s mother on a warrant. Even if there was a question, showing ID would have contributed nothing to answering.

Floyd rises from the curb, still holding his child in his left arm. Cady steps toward him. Floyd turns to walk away and says, “Stop calling me ‘boy!’ ”

Cady grabs Floyd by the right arm while Bridgman grabs Floyd’s child from his left arm. Then, the video shows Cady’s left hand holding small papers that, along with Floyd’s torso, partially block the bodycam while his right hand is up in Floyd’s throat area.

While the use of vulgar language is ubiquitous during these encounters, purportedly as means of shocking a person into recognizing the seriousness of the police and to compel submission to their “lawful” orders, the only reason to call a black man “boy” is to be racist. The hand to the neck doesn’t help, either.

Then again, at least Cady didn’t pull out his weapon, as Glendale, AZ, Officer Matt Schneider, did when Johnny Wheatcroft, a passenger in a car pulled over for a turn signal violation, with his kids in the back, refused to provide his ID.

As Axon, formerly Taser, used to remind us before people kept dying from “excited delerium,” tasing is “less than lethal” so why not use it with abandon when a fellow isn’t jumping high enough?

Minutes later, Wheatcroft was handcuffed lying face down on the hot asphalt on a 108-degree day. He’d already been tased 10 times, with one officer kneeling on his back as another, Officer Matt Schneider, kicked him in the groin and pulled down his athletic shorts to tase him a final time in his testicles, according to a federal lawsuit and body camera footage obtained by Scripps sister station KNXV-TV.

The scene was witnessed by his 11- and 6-year-old sons.

On the bright side, there was no dog present to kill. The first video of Allen Floyd would tend to make some decry racism, and there’s no doubt that racism was apparent in Cady’s calling Floyd “boy.” But the second, far more violent, video provides balance, that while racism remains omnipresent among police officers, the misguided belief that white guys get white glove treatment is wrong. To cops, the color that matters most is blue.

Eliminating racism, and racist cops, is obviously necessary, but that isn’t going to fix a system where every non-cop is treated as less than human, even when there are kids in arms or watching. Deputy Cady is still on the job, to call the next black man “boy.” Officer Schneider is still on the job as well, even though there was nothing racist about his sadistic treatment of Wheatcroft.

And you won’t see either of these videos on the TV show “Cops,” on which Schneider twice appeared.

*Yes, there are other, longer, videos. These are the videos I’ve chosen to use in the post. No doubt, someone will think the video they prefer is better and should have been used. That’s nice. Start your own blog and include whatever video you prefer. This is mine.

14 thoughts on “But For Video: Dads And Cops

  1. Rendall

    It’s an astonishing mystery to me, this cultural phenomena, that folks exist who simultaneously represent the State and bully people at will. Everyone knows it happens, and no one can, or even wants to, stop it. It’s almost as if it’s an intentional feature of the system.

    There was a period in my life I watched so many police brutality videos that YouTube started recommending more to me. My girlfriend suspected morbidity, but I wasn’t enjoying them. I was trying to figure out what was going on. For all of the hours of watching people getting beat up, I got no closer to answers.

    Reply
    1. SHG Post author

      This is a problem I deal with here constantly, deciding what to post about and what videos to show. There are too many, and people either become inured to them or obsessed them, neither of which is useful. Finding solutions to problem is important, and most add nothing but fuel to a fire. This is also why, when I do post vids, I try to use them to make particular points as opposed to the simplistic or fantasy formulations of the problems, which can only lead to simplistic or fantasy solutions that are doomed to fail.

      What caught my eye about the two vids in this post was the reaction to them from two separate audiences. One reflected the outrage of people because is showed horrific police misconduct. One reflected the outrage of people because it showed how the system was racist. As I continue to note, these are both issues, but distinct issues, which eludes far too many of the letter group.

      Reply
      1. Rendall

        Indeed. Police racism and police brutality are symptoms of a deeper malady. If the goal is to end police racism, but we ignore police brutality when it’s “not racist”, we’re scratching not cutting.

        Reply
        1. SHG Post author

          Maybe I was unclear. I don’t see them as “symptoms of a deeper malady,” whatever that means, but two distinct problems that occasionally intersect and are too often confused by people for whom racism is the simplsitic answer everytime a black person is involved.

          Reply
  2. Tom

    What amazes me is that the Supreme Court decided in Brown v. Texas (1979) that the police don’t have the unrestrained right to demand that people identify themselves. And, there is no law that requires a member of the public to carry identification documents.
    The first question that should be asked is why didn’t that police officer know about that holding by the Supreme Court or did he just decide it didn’t apply to him.
    And, this disregard isn’t just that police officer. It took me years to convince the district attorney’s office in Houston that the police don’t have the authority to just walk up to anyone they want and demand identification.
    Aside from being abusive to a citizen, that cop should be fired for being too stupid to carry a badge and a gun. He seems to think he’s the Gestapo or KGB.
    He’s not.

    Reply
    1. Bryan Burroughs

      The Reasonably Stupid Cop Rule applies here. We can’t expect cops to know all of the law, so they are excused from knowing any of it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, unless you’re a cop! Beautiful system we got going on.

      Reply
  3. Ahaz01

    These scenarios repeat themselves adnauseum because the public doesn’t care. They don’t care because they believe that brutality and racism always happens to the other guy. If it doesn’t happen to me and if the police stops someone else, they must have deserved it. Apathy is the problem.

    Reply
  4. B. McLeod

    Well, states and localities that need police forces have no ability to conscript people to police service. They have to start with people who want to be police. Unfortunately, some of those people want to be police so they can bully people and beat them up.

    Reply
  5. Ray

    Do you think there are any (peaceful) solutions?

    If a department feels it’s within in their rights to engage in non-consensual “cock and ball torture” against random citizens who aren’t even accused of a crime, what can anyone do about it?

    All of these peaceful protests don’t seem to be achieving much, other than giving cops lots of helpless people to kick the shit out of.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to editing or deletion if I deem them inappropriate for any reason or no reason. Hyperlinks are not permitted in comments and will be deleted. References to Nazis/Hitler will not be tolerated. I allow anonymous comments, but will not tolerate attacks unless you use your real name. Anyone using the phrase "ad hominem" incorrectly will be ridiculed. If you use ALL CAPS for emphasis, I will assume you wear a tin foil hat and treat you accordingly. I expect civility from you, but that does not mean I will respond in kind. This is my home and I make the rules. If you don't like my rules, then don't comment. Spam is absolutely prohibited, and you will be permanently banned.