Short Take: The Ghastly Legacy of Fear

It’s eminently understandable why participants in a Dyke March might be inclined to harbor some fear, given that Naxos stepped forward at the Motor City march to conclusively demonstrate the flaw in Darwin’s theory.

When word of gunshots spread at the D.C. March, running for cover was hardly an unreasonable thing to do.

Moments later, I heard the sound of people banging on doors and yelling something. I thought maybe it was people celebrating who crossed a line from revelry into rowdiness. I could tell that the sound was traveling down the hall. And then it became clear to me what they were yelling: “Help us! Somebody help us!”

As I approached the door to peer out of the peephole, a group of four young women were banging on my door. I opened it and they rushed in, explaining that they were at the parade, someone said that there were shots and they ran. They ran into my hotel and up the stairs to my floor.

Like any decent person, Charles Blow provided sanctuary to these four young women, although it’s unclear why they ended up on his floor, in front of his hotel room door. Kismet? Whatever. He says it happened that way, and there’s no reason to doubt him.

It eventually became clear that it was a false alarm. There had been no gunshots. They gathered their things to leave the room, and one asked if I was also leaving to go to the party, for which I was now quite late. I said no, that I was going to finish getting dressed.

She responded, the fear returning to her face, “Please walk us down.” I said, still trying to lighten the mood: “Well, looks like I’ll be getting dressed on the elevator. Let’s go.”

I walked them to the front door, and we parted ways.

As Blow explains, he is a father of a daughter, and wouldn’t he want someone to take his daughter in if she was in fear of violence? I know I would. It’s hard to imagine any father who wouldn’t. It’s hard to imagine any decent person who wouldn’t provide shelter to a person in fear of harm.

But at the point where it’s clear that there were no gunshots, there was no threat of harm and that whatever reasonable fear seized the four young women, it was no longer real. And yet, the reasonable basis for fear having passed, Blow was asked to walk the women down. And he did, even though there was no longer any rational basis to be afraid.

It bothered me for the rest of the evening that the entire time the women were in my room they kept apologizing for being there, for disturbing me. It seemed to me that it was I who should have been apologizing to them, or more precisely, it was my generation that should be apologizing to theirs.

It is us who have watched mass shooting after mass shooting and done almost nothing about it, other than to breed and train into our young people a reflexive run-for-your-life or shelter-in-place sensibility.

Blow is half right. It is his generation that bred and trained fear into young people, rather than strength and self-reliance. It is his generation that taught them that fear, whether rational or irrational, should consume their reason. It is his generation that turned young people into weaklings, incapable of standing up to fears, real or imagined. Indeed, teaching them that their irrational fears are every bit as real as things that could actually do them harm.

Those women in my room had every right to fear for their lives. It was perfectly understandable that they could believe that a mass shooter could be anywhere, even at a parade bursting with rainbows.

The occurrence of a mass shooting is an utterly unlikely phenomenon, with lifetime odds of being killed by a mass shooter at 1 in 11,125, That this was a Pride Parade might well alter the odds, to encourage such fear, to call it a “right,” encourages the irrational indulgence of fear rather than the strength and fortitude to face life.

That is the ghastly legacy that my generation has bequeathed to theirs.

Wallowing in irrational fear is, indeed, a ghastly legacy. Blow should apologize for stripping young people of the strength to survive and thrive. What will they do when there’s no savior to open the hotel room door for them or, even after they know it’s safe, walk them back down?

25 thoughts on “Short Take: The Ghastly Legacy of Fear

  1. Guitardave

    Oh…and whats with the Pic? (thank you again for toasting my brains ‘un-see’ function) …not making the connection. Were these fun and games going on at the ‘parade’…?

    Reply
    1. SHG Post author

      Actual image from Motor City march, lest anyone fail to realize why problems to the left are worthy of discussion while there is nothing to discuss about the Naxos of the alt-right who are lost to humanity.

      Reply
  2. Skink

    It’s completely unsurprising that Blow would come to this conclusion. He’s an all-in SJW, on leave from the NYT to write another “memoir.”

    Once upon a long time ago in the Swamp, there was a shooting during a deposition. A pregnant attorney, just covering for the day, was killed. The witness was shot, but survived. The reporter beat the perp with his own cane until cops arrived. He died in prison a couple decades later.

    Now-and-then, I ponder that situation. What would I do if I heard shots while in a conference room? Likely, I’d stick a chair under the door, flip the table and have my weapon in-hand.

    These youngins supposedly* heard someone say there were gunshots, somewhere. They react by entering a hotel, climbing stairs and banging on some random stranger’s door. All because they were “frightened” by what someone told them happened somewhere. The twits erupt: “Good for Blow!” “Blow’s a hero!”

    That’s just what Blow wanted to hear. It’s what he needed to go off on another “guns=bad” rant. It doesn’t matter at all that there were no guns or that the “survivors” or “victims” in his room were neither. Nothing matters but the rant.

    * “Supposedly” is entirely appropriate with Blow.

    Reply
    1. Hunting Guy

      I have to wonder.

      What if Mr. Blow was from Texas or Arizona.

      He lets the girls in, blocks the door and pulls a pistol to protect the young ladies.

      Would they feel protected or frightened?

      Reply
  3. B. McLeod

    This is probably why it is called a “Pride Parade,” rather than a “Fortitude Parade” or an “IQs Running to the Triple Digits Parade.”

    Reply
    1. SHG Post author

      That might be too unfair, given that the fragility bears no connection to sexual orientation and pervades the generation so horribly failed by Blow.

      Reply
  4. Jake

    “The occurrence of a mass shooting is an utterly unlikely phenomenon, with lifetime odds of being killed by a mass shooter at 1 in 11,125”.

    Yeah well, according to the Cato Institute the probability of being murdered by a foreign-born terrorist in the United States is about 1 in 104.2 million per year but that hasn’t stopped us from wasting trillions to prevent another death in this category over the last 18 years.

    Reply
        1. ShootingHipster

          Don’t run of before we completely derail with a discussion of appropriate squirrel calibers.
          Btw Scott, I looked on your Twitter and was sorry to see you’re still having groundhog troubles. There are very few personal problems that cannot be solved through a suitable application of high explosives.

          Reply
          1. LocoYokel

            .233 Remington FTW against groundhogs. Mini-15 or AR, take your pick.

            If you want a smaller, cheaper cartridge, Ruger 10/22

            Reply
            1. LocoYokel

              When I get moved to Virginia, hopefully in July, you need to come down. I’ll make a pastrami (which puts it in at least August for you) and invite my wife’s cousin’s son down and we’ll take you shooting. He has a decent rifle collection and I have a couple and a smattering of pistols. We’ll get you hooked.

  5. Black Bellamy

    I’m sorry, but what is a “Naxos”? I saw this term before, and only here. Google yields pages and pages of tourism information, and there appears to be an opera too. There was some Greek resistance hero who pulled the Nazi flag down from some building, and he was from Naxos. You’re showing pictures of guys with swastikas and you’re like look at those Naxos. That’s confusing. Are these guys Nazis or not?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to editing or deletion if I deem them inappropriate for any reason or no reason. Hyperlinks are not permitted in comments and will be deleted. References to Nazis/Hitler will not be tolerated. I allow anonymous comments, but will not tolerate attacks unless you use your real name. Anyone using the phrase "ad hominem" incorrectly will be ridiculed. If you use ALL CAPS for emphasis, I will assume you wear a tin foil hat and treat you accordingly. I expect civility from you, but that does not mean I will respond in kind. This is my home and I make the rules. If you don't like my rules, then don't comment. Spam is absolutely prohibited, and you will be permanently banned.