Saving FACE: Alerting Students and Parents To The Risk

Last Saturday, I was the keynote speaker at a conference of FACE, Families Advocating for Campus Equality. It was a sobering experience in a great many ways, meeting many parents and students who have been through the wringer of being wrongfully found responsible for sexual misconduct of some form or another and having to deal with the consequences.

While the deal is that nobody talks about fight club, one of the themes that emerges was how to inform new students and their parents of the Kafkaesque nightmare of campus sex inquisitions. Concern for this issue has been greatly exacerbated by the impending shift in rules under Catherine Lhamon, Biden’s head of the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, who is determined to undo the minimal due process provided under the DeVos rules, perhaps the only thing the Trump administration got right. Having spent a decade fighting to give the accused a chance to defend themselves, the whiplash felt by Lhamon’s malicious undoing of the reform is painful.

The problem, far too well known by the families who are involved with FACE, is that a student gets a benign email asking him to come by for a chat with the Title IX administrator, maybe with some vague notification of a problem or maybe not, only to be sandbagged with a three-year-old accusation of a rape.

Often, the student has no appreciation that he’s about to walk into the lion’s den. He won’t tell his parents, either because he doesn’t think it’s needed since he did nothing wrong, or he’s embarrassed or doesn’t want to burden them, and so he goes to the meeting solo, only to be subject to interrogation designed to coerce him into admitting his offense.

Even after the very unpleasant meeting, the student lacks a real appreciation of what just happened and still fails to call his parents, believing that his quasi-denials of wrongdoing (remember, students are indoctrinated in mandatory training to apologize, not because they did wrong but because their accuser feels they did wrong, and that’s sufficient to command an apology and confession of guilt) will suffice to put the matter to rest. Occasionally, it is. Most of the time, it’s not.

One point beaten to death by lawyers doing Title IX work is that the best opportunity to address false accusations is to be represented from the outset, before the initial interrogation, and certainly before the hearing where the student will be found responsible. The problem is that students can’t afford to hire counsel, and they need to bring their parents (who may also be unable to retain a lawyer, but that’s another problem) into the mix, and then the parents need to know where to turn to find a lawyer with knowledge and experience in this highly niche practice. Title IX defense is very much a specialty, and no matter how good or trusted a lawyer may be otherwise, a successful defense requires a lawyer who appreciates just how prolix and absurd the process can be.

Thus, the question bandied about was how to accomplish this, how to let students know that they should, they must, alert their families immediately upon getting that unremarkable email from the Title IX investigator. How to let families know where to turn when they get that call from their kid, rather than call their real estate lawyer or their second cousin who just graduated law school. How to save a young person who did nothing wrong.

At one point, FACE tried to put up fliers in schools to let students know what to do and where to turn, but they didn’t make it to the end of the day before being torn down. Whether by admins or activists for whom throwing a few innocent young men under the bus is unfortunate collateral damage in the glorious war for infantalized women. But I digress.

Universities won’t let them into their freshman indoctrinations about how men are responsible no matter what. Parents of students entering college don’t believe that their little darlin’ will ever be accused of rape, because he’s a good boy, so no reason to be concerned for, or even interested in, an organization dedicated to fighting for due process for the accused on campus.

FACE has the website, has the support, has the resources to guide a parent when they finally get the phone call, but will the parent find FACE? When they do, will it be too late to seize the best oppotunity to help their child who, after realizing that the problem won’t go away because it’s crazy and never happened, will finally be constrained to call home to let mom and dad know that they’ve been suspended or expelled?

That phone call, when your son is on the phone, sobbing, because he’s just come to the realization that everything he’s worked for up to that point, every sacrifice he made and his parents made to get him to that place where he might be able to achieve his goals for a good life, has suddenly disappeared in a wild flash of utterly baseless and nonsensical accusations.

How are students and their parents to learn of the minefield they’re entering before it’s too late? And if this was bad before, it’s about to get worse again as the opportunity to challenge accusations is deliberately denied these students by a cohort of Title IX saviors of survivors determined to make absolutely certain that no “rapist” goes unpunished. And if it means that ten innocent people are held responsible so that one guilty person does not walk free, Lhamon as well as most college administrators will shrug. They can live with that, as it’s far better than women on campus thinking their school won’t do anything necessary to support “survivors.”


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 thoughts on “Saving FACE: Alerting Students and Parents To The Risk

  1. Leonard James Akaar

    Is it unreasonable due to the current environment to suggest finding local professors who could sponsor local student groups who could then paper the school during orientation?

    Is there a partnership with FIRE, which has an existing network of students and whose mission now includes Title IX and Due Process?

    Maybe partner up with the local college Federalist Society or conservative groups…

    Otherwise, targeted Facebook/Twitter ads and viral TikToks

    Targeted google ads for orientation week or move in

    When I was in school in the dark ages, every year we’d be given enormous bags of flyers and coupons advertising all sorts of services, organizations and stores… Anyway to get in on that?

    Sorry for some inane 5am thoughts, and double apologies if you’re not looking for solutions only for someone to listen (which I’m told half the population frequently seeks, sigh, I can never figure this stuff out)

    1. SHG Post author

      I’m very interested in ideas that might help, no matter how simplistic. You never know when a stroke of brilliance will come.

  2. jfjoyner3

    If this had been the law of the land during the 1970’s when I was in my late teens, I would still be in jail today. It is infrequently remembered that girls and guys had similar expectations about sexual behavior in those days. If I were 20 today and behaving as I did at my actual age 20 – omg – I would be beyond the reach of your expert legal services, and beyond all hope (even though I never violated “no”). If I had any moral standing at all I would shout out that Catherine Lhamon is a vicious bitch. But I have no standing and no one hears a tree fall in these parts.

    Now I have a 20-year old son attending university. He’s decent looking, has walking around money all the time, and plays a nasty lead guitar on Strats and Tellys and Les Pauls and all the rest. He only goes to bars to play music … then leaves when the music ends. So far the worst trouble he’s gotten himself into is a speeding ticket. But he ain’t safe from morning-after regret.

    There is very little nowadays that I demand of him, but I will demand he read this post. Despite his mild manner of life, he likes girls and could easily find himself in big trouble.

    1. SHG Post author

      In the throes of the sexual revolution, when women were allowed to be as sexually active as they wanted to be, and if it turned out that they regretted it later, it wasn’t the end of the world that traumatized them in perpetuity so they didn’t have this compulsion to shriek rape. But that was when women were mature, strong and responsible, unlike the weak infants on campus.

      1. Julian Emerson Kennamer

        That was also before certain politicians realized that there was political hay to be made from promoting and then “championing” another group of “victims”…

  3. Hal

    At the risk of making light of something that should be taken seriously, I can’t help thinking “The sexual revolution is over… and we lost”.

  4. Jake H

    Thanks for posting this SHG. With a son who’s a senior in HS and applying to colleges, I’ve been anxious about how the next years will shake out. Good to know about FACE (although shame on the University Industrial Complex that such an organization is even necessary). I’ve been advocating a gap year (or decade) because I’m frankly terrified of the prospects of what will happen to him in college under the Lhamon rules. This trend is only getting worse.

    I don’t think schools (or their useful idiot activists) will allow organizations like FACE to get out in front of kids when they get to school because that would be heretically off-brand. Most folks don’t seem to understand what’s at stake (until it’s too late). I don’t see any solutions, unfortunately, so long as Lhamon and her ilk are in charge at DoE. Tragic.

  5. B. McLeod

    Like every iteration of The Terror, Lhamonism will keep going until the number of sacrificial victims renders its continuation a social impossibility. Until that time, organizations like FACE will only be able to save the random victim, here and there. But each one they do save will be one more person who understands, and whose friends and relatives understand. So, it will be of some help in hastening the inevitable end of Lhamonism.

Comments are closed.