In reaction to the Supreme Court’s holding that affirmative action is unconstitutional, Jane Coaston reminded us that this was a first world problem.
Just a general note that most colleges and universities don’t use affirmative action because most schools accept pretty much everyone who applies. Selective universities are a small slice of what “college” is in America.
— Jane Coaston (@janecoaston) June 29, 2023
Getting into Harvard, Yale and Stanford will be hampered if they don’t use race as factor in admissions. Getting into Trinity Washington University, not so much.
The most obvious way to help colleges level the field among students is to level the field among colleges. But the largest gifts in higher education often go to the institutions with the most resources. Harvard University recently received a gift of $300 million, the University of Chicago received a gift of $100 million and Columbia University received a gift of $175 million. The combined endowments of these institutions add up to more than $74 billion. They can already afford to fund expensive diversity efforts. What if, instead of the $500 million that the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative has pledged to Harvard, it spread that kind of money around institutions like Trinity Washington University, where a majority of students are Black or Hispanic and 63 percent of students are Pell Grant recipients?
The writer, Angel B. Pérez is the chief executive of the National Association for College Admission Counseling and a self-proclaimed beneficiary of affirmative action, giving him two horses in the race. His op-ed starts out with one sketchy claim and one glaring omission, which makes it hard to take him seriously.
I’ve been traveling the country speaking to corporate executives about seismic shifts in higher education: a demographic cliff, decreased state funding, ever-rising tuition and a recent poll showing that over half of Americans don’t believe college is worth the cost. And, of course, the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action, which was handed down on Thursday, banning the use of race in college admissions.
Is he really saying that he’s been traveling around the country speaking about a Supreme Court decision that came out a two days before his op-ed was published? Or is he just not a writer capable of clear expression? Perhaps he should ask his college for a refund as it failed him in thinking and writing.
But more importantly, a majority of Americans not only think college isn’t worth the cost, but that race-conscious admissions are wrong. Maybe he missed that Pew Survey when he was busy traveling around the country speaking about the Supreme Court decision that had yet to exist?
But he also makes a point that, his own cred aside, is worthy of some consideration.
If you haven’t connected the dots for how this will affect your organizations, it’s time to wake up, I have been warning them. For decades, companies in America have relied on colleges and universities to deliver a diverse and well-prepared work force. That gravy train is officially over.
Gravy train? Is educating students so that they may enjoy a future of success in the workplace a, if not the, purpose of college?
But creating that labor pool — taking people from wildly different backgrounds and circumstances and turning them all into polished graduates with comparable skills — is tremendously hard, expensive work. Most corporations that reap the benefits contribute almost nothing to the effort. They sit back and wait, content to let the nation’s colleges and universities scout and nurture that talent.
That’s not going to work anymore.
While colleges turning students from “wildly different backgrounds and circumstances” into “polished graduates with comparable skills” may be a bit hyperbolic, he’s not wrong that the college to C-suite and professional school pipeline might be adversely affected if the handful of elite universities that compete for the handful of well-qualified minority students who are prepared and capable of surviving the rigors of an elite education fail to push out enough warm bodies.
What goes unsaid is that there is tremendous pressure on corporations and professions, law included, to have black people in upper management, the bench and the operating room. One of the most difficult, yet rarely mentioned, problems is that corporations can’t hire and promote minorities when there are not enough to fill the quotas.
Much as quotas are unconstitutional and wrong, it’s always been about quotas since we know what the percentage of black people in the general population is and we know what the percentage of black people in upper management is, and the tacit assumption is that if they’re not at least reasonably close, it must be racial discrimination because what else could it possibly be?
What Perez neglects to mention in his “fixes,” which are essentially that corporations and foundations should throw money at the problem, is that black graduates from Harvard B School are in extreme demand. Black graduates from Trinity Washington University are not. The former have the credentials that are expected of CEOs, whereas Trinity Washington University is already churning out black graduates. Hear a lot about them running Fortune 500 corporations or being nominated to the federal bench?
Perez’s point, that without elite colleges being feeders to top positions in corporations and professional schools, the well of “polished” black graduates will be smaller and competition for them will be increasingly intense in order to bulk up their diversity numbers. Corporate human resource departments are going to be placed in an untenable position, being commanded to find enough black grads to make the corporation or grad school appear to be diverse and inclusive when the numbers aren’t there.
This will likely cause a panic in HR, as nobody wants to say that the reason there aren’t enough black people in management or law or medicine is that there aren’t enough warm bodies who check enough boxes to create the appearance of being dedicated to diversity. The obvious fix is to dig down deeper to find more people without whose primary qualification is their skin color rather than their “polish” or “comparable skills.” Suddenly, Trinity Washington University grads will be in high demand. Not all, of course, but a majority of them. The rest will have to survive the rigors of an elite education.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The fix is actually elementary education. If we started, today, demanding that schools hold black kids to white standards; that 18% reading proficiency among black kids in Chicago means across-the-board firings; that we think black kids are as smart as white kids and failures in their educations are the fault of teachers. Then, in 12 years, when today’s kindergarteners apply for college, they will be on the same footing as their white countrymen. The fact is, we’ve been through four 12-year cycles since the dawn of affirmative action. The problem isn’t at the top, it’s at the bottom. Everything else is bondo and paint coloring over the flaws.
While the root of the problem clearly involves elementary education, to say that black kids need to be “held” to the same standards as white kids is both blind and racist. There are a great many impediments involved, but chalking it up to watering down standards for black kids rather than improving the quality of their education and the culture of valuing education is wrong.
And, this is off topic. Focus.
I am focused on the topic, I’m just at the input side, not the output side. If we start today by demanding schools stop advancing failure and insist on proficiency — if we stop shrugging our shoulders with a “well, what can you expect” attitude, in 16 years, when today’s kindergarteners graduate college, HR directors will have no problem picking diverse candidates, and they won’t need moral and mathematical gymnastics to do it.
I see. So not my topic, but your topic at my post at my blawg, and you persist in arguing your point because that always works out well.
You were so close to not being racist, but you just couldn’t do it.
If American companies have been relying on universities to provide a diverse and prepared workforce, they’ve been screwed for years. The so-called gravy train has been a crazy train for over a decade.
US companies may rely on the skills and knowledge provided by universities for a few select roles, but for most jobs, the truth is that they rely on them for a credential. University degrees are very poor predictors of job performance for most jobs, but corporations love them because a degree requirement is fast and cheap (for them), and best of all, legally trouble-free. If they had invented their own test, with the same predictive validity and racial disparities as a degree requirement, they’d be sued, and they’d lose.
If the universities-as-gatekeepers model is not sustainable, then perhaps it’s time to remove their gatekeeping role, rather than keep throwing more money at them? Remove the legal presumotions and protections given to degree requirements in employment, or give more legal protection to things like sample work or practical skills tests, or both.
Or perhaps we could dispense with the nonsensical notion that a variety of skin colors in the boardroom brings any value to anything (diversity of thought or viewpoint, within limits, does, but that’s brutally suppressed long before anyone would make it to the “ivy-covered professors in ivy-covered halls”). Let the cream rise to the top, whatever skin color it may be.
Or perhaps we could dispense with the nonsensical notion that a variety of skin colors in the
boardroombedroom brings any value to anythingMeh. You seem to havent had the fun gay men have had when it comes to mano a mano skin colors. Maybe the societal answer is forced intimacy with a variety of skin colors. Gay men seem to be the least racist folks in America precisely because we have engaged mano a mano with people of different skin colors. Try getting together with a group of people from different races and ethnicities but without clothing. You might be surprised who become the popular
mandingospeople! It aint the white dudes.Let the cream rise to the top, whatever skin color it may be.
You would have to make that comment. Talk about cruel and unusual punishment!
Humor, my friend. It makes the nonsense of life bearable
The real problem with university education in the US looks back at Mr. Perez in the mirror every morning. Colleges in the US have been charging more money for less product for decades since then Senator Biden sponsored the legislation that created the current student loan crisis and also the explosion in high paid administrative jobs funded by having low wage temps teach the classes.
The brutal reality is that the percentage of Black people with the education necessary for college is much lower than the percentage of Black people as a whole, then again most groups in the US are not uniformly capable of college level work and “college for everyone” is a delusion.
While anecdote is the opposite of data, at my corporate job the quotation of “diverse hires” resulted in two actual Africans, and a mixed race Panamanian, but no actual African-American descended from slaves.
” taking people from wildly different backgrounds and circumstances and turning them all into polished graduates with comparable skills”
We used to have an institution that did this. It was called the military draft. Many consider the draft to be evil, but it did mix together people from all sorts of backgrounds, and the military did teach a lot of people many skills that they could use after they got out. And the military did show that minorities and women could advance to the very highest levels.