Buying A Soldier’s Loyalty

During his bellicose address to the nation, Trump announced that he is sending every member of the United States military a check in the amount of $1776 as a “warrior dividend.” While most of us don’t have any particular problem with giving our military a bonus payment, per se, this payment raises a host of issues, not the least of which is why is he doing this?

President Donald Trump’s promise Wednesday to pay troops a “warrior dividend” bonus is actually a military housing stipend already approved by Congress, and not a generous new White House program.

The rebrand, confirmed by a senior administration official and two congressional officials, follows a pattern for the president, who has previously claimed credit for routine military pay increases that weren’t his doing.

Initially, one would get the impression that this bonus was a gift from Trump to the troops. It’s not. It’s not his money that he’s gifting away, but our money. It’s not that he’s digging into his pocket, or coercing corporations to pony up funds to buy his transitory appreciation. It’s just the money American taxpayers are required to pay in the usual course of events. To the extent it can be thought a gift, it is a gift from us, not Trump.

Further, the president has no authority to spend money, whether for a good cause such as paying the troops or a self-aggrandizing cause such as changing the sign on the front of the Kennedy Center to put Trump’s name up top. But in this case, Congress did appropriate funds, except not for this purpose.

The $1,776 per person bonuses, unveiled by Trump in his nationwide address Wednesday night, will be covered with funding approved in the Big Beautiful Bill that passed in July, according to the congressional officials and later confirmed by the Pentagon.

The payouts — which will cost roughly $2.6 billion — will be a “one-time basic allowance for housing supplement to all eligible service members,” said the official, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue.

In other words, Trump is raiding the housing supplement to divert the funds from their appropriated purpose to his purpose.

But the money will tap into the $2.9 billion approved for military housing supplements as part of the congressional budget reconciliation package, according to the Hill officials. Lawmakers included the money amid concerns that housing stipends have not fully covered military families’ cost-of-living in recent years.

But then, what is his purpose?

When all other guardrails fail, the final road block against a runaway executive is the military. Will Seal Team 6 murder political rivals upon command? Will the military ignore Posse Comitatus? If the president designates his detractors as enemies of the state, will the military take to the streets of America and do as ordered?

While the emboldened Secretary of War conceals evidence of his war crimes, yet orders that Senator Mark Kelly be targeted for his part in a video reminding the troops that they should not follow illegal orders, the generals who remain after the “disloyal” staff has been fired, following the legal analysis of the JAG officers who remain after the “disloyal” JAGs have been fired, appear ready, willing and sadly able to engage in whatever the president commands.

But what about the rank and file, the soldiers and sailors who actually pull the trigger with weapons aimed at their fellow Americans, who might be less concerned with keeping the hardware on their lapels than with the murder of their brothers and sisters?

“President Trump’s administration recognizes the hard work of our service members with this one-time warrior dividend, which places funds directly in the hands of our military members and their families,” the White House said in a statement.

Can Trump buy their loyalty for the $1776 bonus? When the normal guardrails of democracy fall, and the law is no longer honored by the guy in charge of the guns, the final guardrail is the military, which is left with the choice of whether to defend an individual or defend a nation and its Constitution. Is $1776 the price of buying off the last guardrail?


Discover more from Simple Justice

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “Buying A Soldier’s Loyalty

  1. B. McLeod

    Somebody has been reading his Roman history. I can’t wait for the games!!

    It’s been awhile since I priced the sacred loyalty oath of obedience unto death, but I suspect it will run more than $1,776 U.S. Also, and as Roman emperors soon learned, a “one-time” stipend doesn’t cut it.

    [Ed. Note: The Patriot Games?]

    Reply
    1. Oregon Lawhobbit

      And “We Are Marching Like Praetorians*…” Not to mention devalued money. Barbarians at the gates. Horses (well, the back halves) in the Senate.

      To be honest, though, I have to say I’m hoping for the return of the “magnificent draped toga” for court attire…

      *that’s how I remember the lyrics, and I’m sticking to it.

      Reply
  2. Mike

    When I saw news of the bonuses, my immediate impression was that this all was intended to buy loyalty. Will fear be a sufficient motivator, where money fails?

    “1776” as used is a terrible, terrible inversion of our understanding of the date. The regime’s 1:1, systematic substitution of vice for virtue has me thinking, late in life, that Satan is Real. Cue the Louvins.

    Reply
    1. David

      I’m kind of surprised no-one has explicitly asked if Trump is the antiChrist – of course, those most likely to make the comparison to a politician are the fundamentalists who back Trump so of course they wouldn’t…

      Reply
  3. Philip D. Cave

    Here is a question. Who gets a payment under this “plan?” A servicemember who is married or authorized to live off base in non-government housing receives a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). This is calculated by zip code where you (or your family while they are deployed) live. Thus, it varies based on the housing market where they live. There are about 1.3M active duty personnel this year. The Congressional Research Service estimates that about 58% of military personnel live off base and are entitled to BAH. The rest live in government-owned housing or barracks. Travel around the many, many, many bases in the US (and overseas) and look around. Some are in deplorable condition, allegedly mismanaged by government-contracted landlords.

    About 2% are eligible for SNAP. But,

    “It is important to distinguish between food insecurity (the experience of limited or uncertain access to adequate food) and actual SNAP participation:

    A RAND Corporation study found that about 26% of active-duty service members are food-insecure, and roughly 15% of these report relying on food stamps or food banks at some point.

    A USDA survey of food security found that approximately 25 % of military households experienced food insecurity in recent measurement periods (e.g., 2018 and 2020), which is substantially higher than the civilian population, but this does not directly translate to SNAP participation counts.

    Thus, food insecurity is materially elevated among active-duty households, but actual SNAP receipt remains rare because of eligibility rules and income calculations that include military housing allowances.”

    You expect these men and women to go to war for you. They do. Some die, like the National Guard soldiers killed in Syria. (Note: when National Guard personnel are federalized, they become entitled to BAH while on orders.) Some are wounded and have to rely on the Veterans Administration for medical care.

    DO NOT EVER USE THE MILITARY TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS. There are many reasons someone joins the military (one is to materially improve their lives). Consenting to being a political football is not one of the reasons — to make them a political talking point disrespects their service.

    With that, Mr. Grinch repeats the Navy’s saying, “May you have fair winds and following seas,” for the coming year.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to MikeCancel reply