Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt did her job as best she could.
This is a victory for the United States that President Trump and our incredible military made happen.
From the very beginning of Operation Epic Fury, President Trump estimated this would be a 4-6 week operation.
Thanks to the unbelievable capabilities of our warriors, we have…
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 8, 2026
Trump threatened that “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again,” which was variously viewed as Trump being particularly macho or Trump being particularly demented. As it turned out, Iran didn’t “die,” as Trump announced that he would accept Pakistan’s plan for a two-week ceasefire because Iran’s 10-point plan, summarily rejected the day before, was suddenly worthy of discussion.
Ten hours and 26 minutes later, at 6:32 p.m. Eastern time, he lifted the threat, for now. He said an intervention by the Pakistani government had led to a two-week cease-fire in a war that has wracked the world economy and showed off American technological dominance and unexpected Iranian resilience.
Mr. Trump’s tactic of escalating his rhetoric to astronomical levels certainly helped him find an offramp he had been seeking for weeks. That success alone may fuel his belief that the tactics he learned in the New York real estate world — ignore old conventions, make maximalist demands — works in geopolitics as well.
So victory it is? Not so fast.
Without question, it was a down-to-the-wire tactical victory, one that should, at least temporarily, get oil, fertilizer and helium flowing again through the Strait of Hormuz, and calm markets that feared a global energy shock would lead to a global recession.
But it resolved none of the fundamental issues that led to the war.
It leaves a theocratic government, backed by the vicious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in charge of a cowed population that has been pummeled by missiles and bombs, and finds itself still under the thumb of a familiar regime, even if under new management. It leaves Iran’s nuclear stockpile in place, including the 970 pounds of near-bomb-grade material that was, in theory, the casus belli of this war.
It left Gulf allies reeling, with the discovery that the glass skyscrapers of Dubai and the desalination plants that make wealthy enclaves in Kuwait livable can be taken out by Iranian missiles and drones. Gas prices have soared, and are about to test Mr. Trump’s promise that they will fall again to old levels as soon as the fighting stops.
And Iran says it will, at least for the next two weeks, open the Strait of Hormuz, just like it was before Trump dropped the bombs, except now with the unmistakable recognition that Iran can squeeze its sphincter at any moment.
On that point there was an ominous-sounding element buried in the Iranian description of the deal. Shipping would proceed, the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, wrote, but under the control of “Iran’s Armed Forces,” who would determine who passes, and when.
“Iran remains in the control of the Strait, which was not the case before the war,” said Richard Fontaine, the chief executive of the Center for a New American Security, a Washington think tank. “I find it hard to believe that the United States and the world could accept a situation in which Iran remains in control of a key energy checkpoint indefinitely. That would be a materially worse outcome than existed before the war.”
In a sense, this outcome, or offramp assuming that it’s not over yet and Trump decides that he needs to salvage his lost ego consumed in the fire of a burning F-15, might well be far better than pursuing a war without cognizable strategic goals. It’s not that there aren’t a great many reasons to take action against Iran, but what that action is, how it’s to be done, and what purpose it’s intended to serve, were the sort of deliberate things one considers thoroughly and thoughtfully before dropping the bomb.
Or can we pretend that a twit by Leavitt and more incoherent bluffery by the president constitutes a substitute for “Mission Accomplished” at the expense of the lives of 13 American troops, hundreds of American wounded, the loss of numerous jets and helicopters and a Strait of Hormuz in the hands of the new Ayatollah and the IRGC? Plus they still have the enriched Uranium that Trump still insists was “obliterated” last June and the capacity to wreak havoc on the glass towers of its neighbors in the middle east and their ships.
But all of this ignores perhaps the most important part of this fiasco, that the Iranian people who sought freedom and were murdered in the street by the radical regime have gained nothing from this exercise.
There will be no help. There never would.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Mission accomplished you crazy bastards. Praise be to Trump! Hopefully we won’t have to many victories like this in the next three years all this winning is getting to be too much.
I’m not sure it even rises to the level of a Montgomery 90 per cent success.
This must be 11 dimensional chess because victory is folded so deeply in the batshit crazy ten point plan that no one except the president can see it.
I’ve got to believe even the Iranians are confused. “Sure, whatever, let’s spend two weeks trying to dig up enriched uranium and build some more missiles.”
Anyone who could compose a single competent sentence about geopolitics could have informed these asshats that Iran would shut the Strait of Hormuz the second they are attacked. The scenario was much, much better left as a hypothetical statement, a “fleet in being” like the German Navy in WW1. We didn’t need the proof.
I half expected war crimes and a humanitarian crisis. Just stopping on Iran’s terms is better than that. I count small victories where I can. Horrific war crimes or chicken out? Trump made the right call. I’m glad he’s a wimp.
“Iran remains in the control of the Strait, which was not the case before the war,”
and
“Anyone who could compose a single competent sentence about geopolitics could have informed these asshats that Iran would shut the Strait of Hormuz the second they are attacked”
So they were in control before the war, we just didn’t talk about it out loud?
No. They didn’t know they could control the Strait before. Now they do.
The mines and fast boats were decorations before Trump taught them that they could be used for control? That’s your take?
Hi there Rob. Iran’s control of the Strait was a hypothetical awaiting a live experiment. Sure everyone “knew” Iran had such control. Now we have experimental proof. The context has changed even if you don’t think the context matters because you know everything already.
I also brought up the “fleet in being” idea in a now futile attempt to dissuade people saying stupid shit to me, but stupid people can’t tell what’s stupid and what’s not stupid. You are forgiven for your most human of sins.
Read some more and try again, unless you want to chat about the Battle of Jutland in excruciating detail, which would do nothing more than please me greatly. Me and Jackie Fisher and Jellicoe and Beatty are good friends. Do read Mahan too. He’s required.
I’d urge you to read about a dozen more books and then a dozen more before you write another sentence about geopolitics again.
That we “knew” the Strait belonged to Iran and that we know the Strait belongs to Iran are different, distinct, separate things. That we “knew” the British Navy was superior to the German Navy was hypothetical until Jutland proved even with shitty battlecruisers the Brits would win. History teaches. “No plan survives first contact with the enemy.” Or did you not read Sun Tzu and Clausewitz that closely? You’d also recognize that as von Moltke. Younger or Elder? Look it up.
Perhaps we could have kept the Strait open. Now we know we cannot, at least under current dumbass leadership that looks at history and has decided purging generals is a good idea. Did Stalin a hell of a lot of good until he let Zhukov bail his ass out.
Read more and question yourself more. It never was a certainty that Iran would do what they did. War is never certain, if anything is. You annoyed me in particular because I felt you far too cocksure, thus the response rather than ignoring you.
No more responses because you have homework to do at a library. Good luck. I can and would write about this endlessly. Thank you for your pitiful challenge. As Admiral Jackie Fisher closed some letters, until cinders burn.
Did your AI chatbot watch Good Will Hunting before writing this for you?
“I was just hoping you could give me some insight into the evolution of the market economy in the southern colonies.”
All the best