Author Archives: SHG

Seaton: Dead Body Disposal

The “rib,” or practical joke, is as integral to professional wrestling as a headlock. With long road trips common in the business and weeks sharing the same locker room with the same guys, ribs were a way to relieve tension and provide much needed laughter among the boys.

Ribs take many forms. They can be as simple as rubbing Tiger Balm all over someone’s clothing or as elaborate as removing the engine from a wrestler’s car.

And then there were guys like Jackie and Don Fargo, who took it to another level. Continue reading

Short Take: Nary A Crumb

Back in the ’60s, underground comix were very cool, and the coolest were done by R. Crumb. Remember Mr. Natural? Zap comix, violating taboos whenever possible? Wild stuff for wild times, representing the exuberance of counterculture youth rejecting the constraints of the Silent Majority’s rules through nasty, ugly, cutting satire. Remember?

Continue reading

Was Slavery Really On The Ballot?

Five states had propositions on the ballot to remove “slavery” from their Constitutions. Four passed, and the fifth, Louisiana, was a poorly drafted change that found little support on either side the issue. Wait, you say. Side? What side could there possibly be that was in favor of state constitutions permitting slavery? I mean, it’s slavery. Didn’t we fight a war to rid ourselves of slavery?

The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution contains a clause of which many are unaware. Continue reading

Democracy, Good And Hard

As of this writing,* it appears that there will not only be no “red wave” from the midterms, but it may turn out that Biden’s Dems may have the best outcomes of any election in the last 20 years. It’s possible that the GOP will eke out a majority in the House, though it appears that the “quality candidates” blew the Senate. Who thought Herschel Walker was a viable candidate for senator, other than a pathetic fraud whose sole concern was fealty to him personally?

As Mencken said, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” Maybe the common people aren’t as stupid as some would have us believe. There are, of course, many elected who are fools and knaves, if not both, but there are always outliers and they don’t change the bigger picture. Continue reading

Twelve, Neither More Nor Less

Why twelve? Why not 14 or 10? It’s not an unfair question but for the fact that a number existed at the time the Bill of Rights was ratified that was so deeply embedded in common law history and tradition that it was accepted as the number of people that made up a jury for the trial of serious criminal offenses.

And while scholars may debate the precise moment when the common-law jury came to be fixed at 12 members, this much is certain: By the time of the Sixth Amendment’s adoption, the 12-person criminal jury was “an institution with a nearly four-hundred-year-old tradition in England.”

Continue reading

Tomorrow’s Meaning Today

Will it be a red wave or a blue vindication? Both tribes have done everything possible to lose, to demonstrate their inability to break free of their most radical influences that the vast majority of a nation despises, to offer candidates that people want to vote for rather than hate the least.

Nobody knows what tomorrow will bring. At least I don’t, no matter what I suspect. Is it the death of democracy as the president and the New York Times claim, or is it the pocketbook concerns that affect ordinary Americans in their daily lives? Continue reading

Will The En Banc 5th Circuit Deny The “Obvious”?

The phenomenon of “citizen journalists” has had a curious history since social media allowed anyone to claim the protections of the First Amendment’s Freedom of the Press. Some, like Carlos Miller, with his blog Photography is not a Crime, spawned movements to protect the constitutional right to video police. Others wore the mantle in the expectation that they could use it to falsely attack with abandon and then hide behind the claim of being a journalist exposing baseless conspiracies.

In Laredo, Texas, Priscilla Villarreal was a bit of both, revealing actual news on her Facebook page, LaGordiloca, with harsh criticism of law enforcement and prosecution. Unsurprisingly, this gained her a significant following as well as some people who didn’t like her very much. Continue reading

The NBA Draft

I dipped my toe in controversy yesterday, not because I have any particular feelings about basketball, in general, or the Nets, in particular. It was because I, being Jewish, could say something that a non-Jew would have been ripped to shreds as a hater for saying. Yes, it was about a basketball player named Kyrie who rode the Kanye (Ye?) West’s antisemitism train into suspension, and possibly the end of his career.

Here’s the weird thing. I have never, to my knowledge, watched Kyrie Irving play basketball. I assume he plays well or he wouldn’t be in the NBA, but beyond that, he means nothing to me. To be honest, I’m not exactly an aficionado of Ye either and wouldn’t be able to name a song of his or, until I googled it, tell you what his sneakers looked like. But I digress. Continue reading

Seaton: All Eyes On Athens

Ladies and gentlemen, friends of the Friday Funny, I hope you’re as excited as I am for tomorrow. The biggest football game of the year will take place on November 5 in Athens, Georgia. That’s where the #2 ranked University of Tennessee Volunteers are going to hand the defending National Champions, the Georgia Bulldogs, their first loss and cement the Vols’ shot at the SEC Championship game in Atlanta.

When I last spoke of football on Rocky Top, I’ll admit I was apprehensive about Florida. Sure, the Vols got revenge from last year on Pitt, but I wasn’t sure we had the gear in us to beat the Gators. Continue reading

Judge Stearns To First Circuit: Screw Pseudonymity

Despite the efforts of “amicus” Eugene Volokh to use the Doe v. MIT Title IX case to push his war against pseudonymous litigation, the First Circuit held that there were four “paradigms” that compelled the district courts to allow a plaintiff to sue as a John Doe.

Volokh pursued the generic right of the public to know who was using the courts to sue to try to force an innocent male accused, whose identity had been protected under FERPA during the campus sex tribunal, to expose his name and the false accusations against him for which he was wrongfully found responsible because of the denial of due process and the institutional bias against males. Continue reading