Is it wrong for a city government to make the deliberate choice of trying to be more sensitive to and accommodating of street crime? While there may be good reason to be more understanding and less harsh than governments have historically been when they viewed crime as a social and moral failing rather than the last recourse of victims and the end result of oppression, it presents something of a problem for local businesses, particularly in the Tenderloin of Frisco.

Another merchant revolt is in the works four months after small business owners in the Castro penned a letter to various city officials demanding, among other things, that 35 beds in the city’s shelter system be designated for unhoused people in the LGBTQ neighborhood. This time, business owners in the beleaguered Tenderloin are demanding a refund of last year’s taxes and fees to help them cover the costs of trying to sustain businesses amid the crime and drug dealing on the neighborhood’s streets. Continue reading →

When the Anti-Drug Abuse Act was passed in 1986, it was in the throes of the crack epidemic. Crack was some super-evil drug, invariably addictive, giving its users superhuman strength and such an extreme need for more crack that they would engage in all manner of violent and horrific acts to get the money for their next fix. At the same time, powdered coke was the darling of the hip set, snorted openly at cool places like Studio 54 by hip folks with names everyone knew. Continue reading →

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Rarely is that more true than here.

This was the “major announcement” of a putative candidate for president, that he was selling NFTs of his thin and manly fantasy self. Was this his way of demonstrating his self-loathing or just another grift to see how stupid his followers were, whether they would spend good money to buy the Trump version of the Barbie Dream House? Continue reading →

When I was young, teaching, like nursing, was still largely a women’s job. It was one of the jobs where women were predominate, and so smart, capable women went into it for lack of alternatives where they would be accepted. But since women were rarely the primary breadwinners, and their incomes were secondary to the family, their pay was decent, but not great. After all, these were women, so whatever money they brought home was atop their husband’s. It was gravy, if you will. Continue reading →

For years, people have asked how they can get out of jury duty. My response has always been the same, that we need good jurors or the system doesn’t work. People tend to agree, but they still want to get out of jury duty. Let some other guy be the good person.

But now a Legal Aid Society lawyer with a felony conviction has decided he not only wants to be on a jury, but that his exclusion from jury service for having a prior felony conviction is racist and unconstitutional. Continue reading →

My old friend, Ken, announced that he was leaving twitter yesterday. His reasoning was fair and internally consistent with his oft-repeated position on free speech.

This is exactly how it’s supposed to work, as I’ve been arguing for years. Twitter — or whoever runs it — has rights. I have rights. If one of us disagrees with the other’s exercise of rights, we can part company. That, not government regulation, is the way to do it. I’m repulsed by the flood of triumphant bigotry and trolling, and by Musk’s sad-lonely-boy leaning into the arms of freaks who embrace him in his fruitless quest for love. But I’d never ask the government to stop it. I’m voting with my feet, exactly the way I’ve been telling people to do for years.

Continue reading →

The crux of the Bulwark post was that limiting abortion to women who were raped raises a serious, and underappreciated problem: It puts the burden on women to prove they were raped to avail themselves of the exception, and police have not always been been accommodating of women who complain that they’ve been raped. Of course, there is the possibility that someone will falsely claim to be a rape victim to get an exemption from an abortion ban, leaving the question whether to favor false positives or negatives. This is more a political issue than anything else.

But buried within the post was this assertion. Continue reading →

The release of an American imprisoned in Russia should be a joyous occasion. And that Brittney Griner is back home with her family is, indeed, a wonderful thing. So why then is it so controversial? Even worse, why are so many upset by it?

There is the question of whether the one-for-one prisoner swap for arms dealer Victor Bout was a good deal, but that emits the unpleasant odor of rationalization. Few gave any thought to Bout until his name was highlighted in this swap, and suddenly he’s so important that his  continued imprisonment for another seven years until his sentence is served is more critical than this swap? It may not have been a good deal, but that’s not what’s really bugging people. Continue reading →

On the surface, it’s one of those laws that has surface appeal to people who have neither  a functional understanding of the nature of litigation nor a firm appreciation that not all disputes fit into their simplistic mold of one side good, the other evil. The Speak Out Act has now been signed into law by President Biden.

On Wednesday the President signed the “Speak Out Act,” now Public Law 117-224. The law exempts disputes over sexual assault or harassment from pre-signed nondisclosure or nondisparagement agreements, in the hopes of encouraging survivors to come forward without fear of being sued.

Continue reading →

Most of you might have heard of ChatGPT these days. It’s an AI chatbot that can do an amazing number of things from selling sprockets to writing episodes of “Friends.”

Because I am busy this week I’ve outsourced the Friday Funny to ChatGPT.

I blame the robots for taking my job.

Tell a humorous story about cash bail. Continue reading →