Author Archives: SHG

Tuesday Talk*: Was Ghislaine Maxwell Denied A Defense?

The case against Jeffrey Epstein proxy Ghislaine Maxwell is now in the hands of the jury, with the two sides having summed up their positions.

“It is crystal clear that Maxwell knew about and was deeply involved in Epstein’s sexual abuse of children,” Alison Moe, an assistant U.S. attorney, told the jury in a closing argument that sought to tie together the government’s evidence, which was presented over 10 days. “Maxwell was key to the whole operation,” she said.

Ms. Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger, acknowledged in her summation on Monday that the government had “certainly proved” that Mr. Epstein was a “master manipulator” who abused his wealth and privilege. But, she said, “we are not here to defend Jeffrey Epstein.” Continue reading →

Where Does Chris Noth Go To Defend?

Not that he hasn’t been acting all along, but when he died on a Peloton bike in the latest remake of Sex in the City, actor Chris Noth, “Big” on the show, went viral. That lasted for days, about a week, and then it happened.

Triggered by the recent ‘Sex and the City’ reboot, the women allege two incidents of misconduct they say took place more than a decade apart.

The two accusers alleged that they were raped by Noth, one in 2004 and the other in 2015. They appear, as has become the fashionable framing, to be credible accusations. In response, Noth “categorically denied” any misconduct. Continue reading →

Folding Law Within Law

The bill was called “Build Back Better” because giving bills cool names has proven more effective in getting public support than actually “selling” the public on what the bill does. Remember the USA PATRIOT Act?* And who doesn’t want to build back better, because building back worse, or not building back at all, sounds horrible. But as becomes clear in the years after a law is enacted, what exactly was done may neither be what the name suggested nor what works.

The efficacy of omnibus bills, proposed laws that cover and broad swathe of unrelated or quasi-related programs, spending and prohibitions, is obvious. The less we know about what’s in there, the fewer things we find to criticize. And it plays the parts we like against the parts we don’t, the parts that seem like a good idea against how that seemingly good idea will actually happen. As hard as it may be to come up with an agreeable law addressing a specific problem, with the right focus, words, execution and funding, it’s far harder to do so when there are a hundred laws folded into one omnibus law. Continue reading →

The Ignored Years

Much as we may well believe we know where we are at the moment, with progressive forces doing their very best to convince us that the demise of free speech and thought is social justice, many of us wonder where this came from and how such irrational if over-educated ideologues managed to pull of the greatest coup against enlightenment since the dark ages. The President of FIRE, Greg Lukianoff, offers a bit of history to explain.

The 1994 movie PCU, about a rebellious fraternity resisting its politically correct university, was a milestone. Not because the movie was especially good—it wasn’t. It was a milestone because it showed that political correctness had officially become a joke. Continue reading →

Short Take: Emojis Are Violence

One of my long-running jokes on twitter is “emojis are violence.” To be fair, I’m not a fan of emojis. They’re childish and rarely do they convey a message either of value or coherence. When I ask people what a string of emojis proffered by someone else means, they give some vague answer because they don’t really know. They may get the gist of the message, like someone likes or hates something, but that’s about as close as it gets to actual meaning. I don’t like them.

But emojis aren’t violence. They’re emojis. Silly and pointless, in my view, but just emojis. What sort of blithering idiot would claim emojis are actually violence? Continue reading →

Florida Supreme Court Says No, Again

The American Bar Association, ever vigilant that diversity and inclusion be the primary goal of its existence, crafted a mandate that its Continuing Legal Education panels contain the “correct” distribution of race, gender and orientation demographics, or else.

The ABA policy said the association expects all its sponsored or co-sponsored CLE programs to include members of diverse groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability.

The ABA policy said CLE programs with three or more panelists, including the moderator, must have at least one member from a diverse group. Programs with five to eight panelists must have at least two diverse members, and programs with nine or more panelists must have at least three diverse members.

Continue reading →

The Failure of Denialism

One of the first things you learn in the trenches is that you do not tell a judge that something that’s obviously real isn’t real. Not only will you lose your argument, but you lose your credibility. The former is bad for the client. The latter is a disaster for the lawyer. Credibility once lost is likely gone forever.

Yet, denying reality has been at the forefront of many of the battles for reform. Despite a spike in murders and assaults, police and crim law reformers vehemently deny that there is a crime problem. The reason is obvious, that fear of crime pushes the public to back simplistic Draconian fixes and reject the efforts to reform many of the worst aspects of the legal system. The window of opportunity opened by the public’s shift against police and “systemic racism” will slam shut as fear of crime seizes their consciousness. Continue reading →

Bad Prosecutions And The Low Hanging Argument Against Them

The parents of Ethan Crumley, James and Jennifer, have been charged with manslaughter for their son’s school shooting and killing of four students. On its surface, many applaud this prosecution, as they seem to be horrible parents who produced and facilitated action from a child that had horrific and tragic consequences. There is little sympathy of the Crumley family to be found.

But the attenuated connection between being bad parents and a child murdering students is a huge legal stretch. That doesn’t mean it won’t work, just as the sophist legal reasoning that turned drunk drivers into murderers worked. Or, if that example doesn’t bother you too much, the legal reasoning that turned in rem civil asset forfeiture to “take the profit out of crime” into a license to steal. It may start with the people we hate, so we shrug off the outrageousness of the law because “screw ’em,” but it never ends there. Continue reading →

Tuesday Talk*: Did Polis Get Masks Right?

While some governors are flexing their mask muscles to address, whether in reality or appearance, the concern for the next variant of Covid, Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, has taken a very different approach to masks.

All hail Colorado’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, who liberated himself from the “forever COVID” mentality that has gripped far too many lawmakers.

Ever think you would see “all hail” a Dem in the New York Post? Continue reading →

Should Maxwell Be Allowed Anonymous Defense Witnesses?

Among the litany of problems a defendant faces at trial that elude those who simplistically believe forcing every case to trial rather than plea is that witnesses, even in a mundane case that won’t make the front page of the New York Times, don’t want to testify. Maybe they fear police retaliation. Maybe they have skeletons in their closet they would prefer stay there. Maybe they’re afraid of what the neighborhood will think. Maybe they just don’t want to get involved.

There’s rarely much good to come from being a witness for the defense. They don’t hand out medals and rarely does anyone extol your bravery for being so honest for the benefit of that mutt everybody knows is guilty. So why do it? Continue reading →