Sure, the Supreme Court held that corporal punishment in schools was not cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment in Ingraham v. Wright, but we’re better than that now. We don’t let teachers strike kids anymore. We know that’s harmful, that’s cruel and that’s wrong. Or do we?

The road to corporal punishment in Cassville, [Missouri] a city located nearly 60 miles southeast of Springfield, started earlier this year with an anonymous survey of parents, students and school employees. Continue reading →

In elite circles, where they keep changing pedagogical methods until every child is equitably illiterate, the test for being licensed as a social worker has been branded “racist.” John McWhorter points out a problem with the conclusion.

The Association of Social Work Boards administers tests typically required for the licensure of social workers. Apparently, this amounts to a kind of racism that must be reckoned with. Continue reading →

Edward Niedermeyer (no known relation to Douglas) isn’t wrong.

Compared to the herculean task of building supply chains to sustain a broad domestic E.V. market, tackling this problem from the demand side almost seems easy. Proving that E.V.s can road trip may have been an important psychological hurdle for the technology to tackle, but it remains more psychological than real: the average American motorist drives about 40 miles per day and 95 percent of our car trips are 30 miles or shorter.

Continue reading →

Pastor Michael Jennings of Vision of Abundant Life Ministries in Sylacauga was, as one would suspect, a good guy, meaning that he was engaged in a good deed and perceived himself to be on the correct side of the good guy curve, where a pastor ought to be. And to be as fair as humanly possible to Pastor Jennings, he was not wrong. But he wasn’t quite right either.

It all started with Jennings being a good neighbor, according to Georgia-based civil rights attorney Harry Daniels, one of three attorneys representing Jennings. Continue reading →

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart has directed the Department of Justice to produce a redacted version of the search warrant affidavit used to obtain the warrant for Mar-a-Lago. The government has done so and the mag has ordered its release by noon today.

A federal judge on Thursday ordered that a redacted version of the affidavit used to obtain a warrant for former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida residence be unsealed by noon on Friday — paving the way for the disclosure of potentially revelatory details about a search with enormous legal and political implications.

Continue reading →

Some rando jumped into my mentions on the twitters in reply to a twit of mine about student loan debt forgiveness with the riposte, “but what about PPP loans”? I blew it off because it was so monumentally stupid as to be unworthy of discussion. I mean, there was nothing about the PPP, the congressionally enacted Paycheck Protection Program, that bore any relation to presidential forgiveness of student loan debt under the guise of a national emergency response to COVID.

And then it happened. First, former Southern District of New York United States Attorney cum drug warrior and black man enslaver turned dream date of the chic left for being fired by Trump despite prisons filled with black and brown people for drugs, Preet Bharara. Continue reading →

In the scheme of Title IX suits brought in federal courts to challenge the outcomes of campus sex tribunals, pseudonymity has largely been the norm other than the few cases where the identity of the accused is so well and widely known that there’s no putting the toothpaste back in the tube. And, indeed, that was the analogy drawn by Judge Bruce Selya writing for the court in Doe v. MIT.

While the underlying facts of the case really aren’t relevant to the holding, the only issue being whether the plaintiff could proceed under the Doe ‘nym rather than in his true name, it’s helpful to briefly take note of the facts only to appreciate what’s at stake in these cases, and at risk of being turned into an untenable challenge because the accused would be burned at the stake once his name became known, and any eventual ruling in his favor would do little to unring the accused death knell. Continue reading →

Death tends to be something of an equalizer. Aside from someone so awful that death presents relief, most of us (Felicia Sonmez notwithstanding) defer to condolences or, at worst, silence. After all, don’t speak ill of the dead isn’t merely a well-established social norm (unlike the many invented last week and now being forced upon us), but a sound one.

Death is sad. Whether we love someone or not, loved ones are left behind who deserve some sympathy. When the death is tragic, what sort of animal would use the opportunity to attack the deceased? Continue reading →

I was informed by a gentleman whose mother was a Rockefeller that the only question that really mattered when meeting someone was whether they were the sort of person you would invite to dinner. This, some of you might remember, was what motivated Trump to run for office, as neither the old guard of New York nor Palm Beach would invite him to dinner, hurting his feelings and compelling him to prove his mettle by becoming someone “important,” in a Rooseveltian sort of way.

Trump ended up winning the election, but not a seat at the dinner table, for the very reason he was never a suitable dinner guest in the first place. He failed to grasp that being elected president didn’t make you important, but being the sort of person people respected enough to elect as president was the attribute. Continue reading →

The old saw is that the reason academic politics are so vicious is that the stakes are so small. But if George Santayana had anything on the ball, then his point that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” is worth remembering even if it’s a little less snarky. History matters, or at least it did until historians broke it.

It began on August 17, when James Sweet, the president of the AHA, posted a mildly provocative article in the association’s house journal, Perspectives on History:

“IS HISTORY HISTORY?
Identity politics and Teleologies of the Present” Continue reading →