Much as we may well believe we know where we are at the moment, with progressive forces doing their very best to convince us that the demise of free speech and thought is social justice, many of us wonder where this came from and how such irrational if over-educated ideologues managed to pull of the greatest coup against enlightenment since the dark ages. The President of FIRE, Greg Lukianoff, offers a bit of history to explain.

The 1994 movie PCU, about a rebellious fraternity resisting its politically correct university, was a milestone. Not because the movie was especially good—it wasn’t. It was a milestone because it showed that political correctness had officially become a joke. Continue reading →

One of my long-running jokes on twitter is “emojis are violence.” To be fair, I’m not a fan of emojis. They’re childish and rarely do they convey a message either of value or coherence. When I ask people what a string of emojis proffered by someone else means, they give some vague answer because they don’t really know. They may get the gist of the message, like someone likes or hates something, but that’s about as close as it gets to actual meaning. I don’t like them.

But emojis aren’t violence. They’re emojis. Silly and pointless, in my view, but just emojis. What sort of blithering idiot would claim emojis are actually violence? Continue reading →

The American Bar Association, ever vigilant that diversity and inclusion be the primary goal of its existence, crafted a mandate that its Continuing Legal Education panels contain the “correct” distribution of race, gender and orientation demographics, or else.

The ABA policy said the association expects all its sponsored or co-sponsored CLE programs to include members of diverse groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability.

The ABA policy said CLE programs with three or more panelists, including the moderator, must have at least one member from a diverse group. Programs with five to eight panelists must have at least two diverse members, and programs with nine or more panelists must have at least three diverse members.

Continue reading →

Ed. Note: Who doesn’t fight with loved ones at some point during the holidays? Fault Lines alumni Mario Machado and Chris Seaton seem to love arguing with each other, so they put a debate topic on Twitter, and with over sixty percent of the vote, SJ readers chose “Resolved: Die Hard is a Christmas Movie” as the SJ Holiday Debate topic. Chris will argue the affirmative, Mario the negative. Below is Mario’s argument.

Eight minutes into the Die Hard celluloid and inside a limo, John McClane asks his driver why he’s not playing “Christmas music.” McClane is on to something very early, if only by accident, because this movie isn’t about Christmas. This movie is about an overzealous NY cop, played by Bruce Willis, who managed to fool enough people to demand – and pay for – a series of potboilers that would make Baby Jesus hide his face and weep. Continue reading →

Ed. Note: Who doesn’t fight with loved ones at some point during the holidays? Fault Lines alumni Mario Machado and Chris Seaton seem to love arguing with each other, so they put a debate topic on Twitter, and with over sixty percent of the vote, SJ readers chose “Resolved: Die Hard is a Christmas Movie” as the SJ Holiday Debate topic. Chris will argue the affirmative, Mario the negative. Below is Chris’ argument.

Ah, Christmas. A time when we hang the stockings by the chimney, put decorations on the tree, and watch Hans Gruber fall to his death from Nakatomi Tower to celebrate the season.

Hey, some people go for “National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation” or “It’s A Wonderful Life.” There’s no denying, however, that Bruce Willis’ action classic “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie. Continue reading →

One of the first things you learn in the trenches is that you do not tell a judge that something that’s obviously real isn’t real. Not only will you lose your argument, but you lose your credibility. The former is bad for the client. The latter is a disaster for the lawyer. Credibility once lost is likely gone forever.

Yet, denying reality has been at the forefront of many of the battles for reform. Despite a spike in murders and assaults, police and crim law reformers vehemently deny that there is a crime problem. The reason is obvious, that fear of crime pushes the public to back simplistic Draconian fixes and reject the efforts to reform many of the worst aspects of the legal system. The window of opportunity opened by the public’s shift against police and “systemic racism” will slam shut as fear of crime seizes their consciousness. Continue reading →

The parents of Ethan Crumley, James and Jennifer, have been charged with manslaughter for their son’s school shooting and killing of four students. On its surface, many applaud this prosecution, as they seem to be horrible parents who produced and facilitated action from a child that had horrific and tragic consequences. There is little sympathy of the Crumley family to be found.

But the attenuated connection between being bad parents and a child murdering students is a huge legal stretch. That doesn’t mean it won’t work, just as the sophist legal reasoning that turned drunk drivers into murderers worked. Or, if that example doesn’t bother you too much, the legal reasoning that turned in rem civil asset forfeiture to “take the profit out of crime” into a license to steal. It may start with the people we hate, so we shrug off the outrageousness of the law because “screw ’em,” but it never ends there. Continue reading →

While some governors are flexing their mask muscles to address, whether in reality or appearance, the concern for the next variant of Covid, Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, has taken a very different approach to masks.

All hail Colorado’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, who liberated himself from the “forever COVID” mentality that has gripped far too many lawmakers.

Ever think you would see “all hail” a Dem in the New York Post? Continue reading →

Among the litany of problems a defendant faces at trial that elude those who simplistically believe forcing every case to trial rather than plea is that witnesses, even in a mundane case that won’t make the front page of the New York Times, don’t want to testify. Maybe they fear police retaliation. Maybe they have skeletons in their closet they would prefer stay there. Maybe they’re afraid of what the neighborhood will think. Maybe they just don’t want to get involved.

There’s rarely much good to come from being a witness for the defense. They don’t hand out medals and rarely does anyone extol your bravery for being so honest for the benefit of that mutt everybody knows is guilty. So why do it? Continue reading →

Will there be civil war over abortion? Charles Blow sees it coming.

In a dissent on Friday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote: “This is a brazen challenge to our federal structure. It echoes the philosophy of John C. Calhoun, a virulent defender of the slaveholding South who insisted that States had the right to ‘veto’ or ‘nullif[y]’ any federal law with which they disagreed.”

I found the invocation of South Carolina’s Calhoun striking.

Continue reading →