Almost Book Review: Keith Lee’s The Marble and The Sculptor

When Keith Lee started his acclaimed blog, Associate’s Mind, I wasn’t quite sure what to make of it.  Clearly, Keith wasn’t a whiner, nor afraid of hard work, adversity or the role he was to play as a lawyer.  He understood that we serve clients, not the other way around.  What was wrong with this kid?

Today, Keith’s book The Marble and the Sculptor, published by the ABA, is officially released.  Much as I would like to review it as I would any other book, I can’t.  Having written the forward to the book, it’s a bit disingenuous to make it appear now as if I’m reviewing it as a neutral.

But had I not thought this book worthy of being mandatory reading for law students and new lawyers, I wouldn’t have written the forward. See how that works?

The book is an aggregation of accumulated wisdom.  Keith borrows heavily from some of the best experienced lawyers around, like Dan Hull and Mark Bennett,  There’s even a bit of me in there, though without attribution which is probably wise.

What makes the book work is that Keith has synthesized the ideas and words of lawyers who came before him into easily readable, easily comprehensible, easily digestible nuggets.  Anecdotes are brief and interesting, and are used to demonstrate the point he’s trying to make. They do their job well.

Although many of the messages in the book come from curmudgeonly types, this is a book only a younger lawyer could have successfully written.  It doesn’t lecture. It’s not pedantic.  It’s written by a young lawyer for other young lawyers, and its tone and manner are perfect for its audience.  Had a graybeard tried to offer the same advice, he would be accused of arrogance and condescension.  From one of their own, new lawyers will embrace the wisdom rather than fight it.

Before he begins, he offers a challenge to the reader by recognizing that this book isn’t for everyone.  The point isn’t to dismiss anyone as unworthy, or to put anyone down, as so many overly sensitive and entitled new lawyers seem to view any ideas that don’t fully support their misery or excuse their complaints.

Rather, the challenge is to make the decision to use the book to pick themselves up and make the best of their careers. It’s not that they’re necessarily wrong about law school or the profession, but that no one ever succeeded by complaining about it. He offers a choice, make it better or don’t bother reading the book. If all they want is a tummy rub, this book isn’t for them. And indeed, it’s not.

He starts out in law school and works his way through the early years of practice. Keith doesn’t sugar coat reality, but at the same time, doesn’t wallow in misery. There is an aspect of the book that comes through the eyes of a martial artist, employing concepts used to push through one challenge to push through another. It’s an apt analogy, and serves not only to help the reader to appreciate that all accomplishment requires effort and focus, but reminds the reader that law isn’t the only endeavor that isn’t easy. Yet people survive and thrive, and so can they.

It had been my plan to discuss my favorite chapter of the book, entitled “The Privilege of Being A Servant.”  Perhaps nothing more epitomizes what lawyers are about than this, and until a lawyer fully grasps why the profession exists, he cannot move forward to fulfill his obligation.  But then Jamison Koehler, bastard, beat me to the punch in discussing this chapter, so I defer.

Sal

It’s not at all clear to me why Keith asked me to write the forward, as it seems there were any number of better choices around.  But having done so, I was able to coerce Keith into drawing me a pic of Sal the Pineapple on the title page in return.

This is important as I fully anticipate Keith’s book to join the very select stable of books that form the foundation for new lawyers to transition to the practice of law. For all those lawprofs who claim they want their students to be “practice ready,” this book is a far, far better step toward that unaccomplishable goal than they could ever do on their own.  This should be required reading before any student is allowed to graduate from law school. (That’s a hint, prawfs.)

Is the book perfect? Frankly, I’m a bit iffy on the title. I get why Keith chose it, but it conjures an image of Michelangelo for me (come to think of it, The Agony and the Ecstasy wouldn’t have been a bad title).  Had Keith asked my advice, I would have suggested he call it The Rookie’s Guide to Practicing Law to juxtapose it with Mark Hermann’s Curmudgeon’s Guide, another must-read staple for lawyers. Aside from that, I’ve got nothing. The book is the real deal.

Years from now, this book will still be read by new lawyers and its evergreen contents will be as useful and truthful as they are today.  And only my copy has this really cool picture. Eat yer hearts out.

 

 

18 comments on “Almost Book Review: Keith Lee’s The Marble and The Sculptor

  1. Logan

    Would you recommend this book to someone considering Law school? Or is the wisdom provided of a nature that wouldn’t be useful to a prospective law student?

  2. Pete

    Interesting review, I would not have known about the book otherwise. Thank you.
    I’m curious, what would be your list of foundational reading for the new lawyer? May is fast approaching.

    1. SHG Post author

      These go to the practice of law. Specific practice areas may have specific books of their own.

      1. The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law
      2. Solo By Choice (1st Ed.) if you have any plans on going solo
      3. The Marble and the Sculptor

          1. Pete

            I actually have the second book, it was very worthwhile. I’ll look into the first.

            Books like the one reviewed are imperative for people like me. I feel bad for my peers who aren’t looking outside the box that is law school for guidance. I feel confident saying I have learned more about what it means to be a lawyer reading a bunch of blawgs than I have ever learned in my classes.

            An example of why this is important- My law school is offering a brand new class next semester, “Law Practice Management and Entrepreneurship.” It sounds like a great idea. The obvious question is “who is the teach?” Turns out it is a prof of 30+ years whose expertise includes Copyright and “Law and the Arts”. He worked a year in the basement of a huge NYC firm, and started the prof track from there. I’m sure he and the University have the best of intentions, but how can he teach me how to manage a firm? It’s hard to picture a self-respecting professor using the book of a solo-practitioner. Blind leading the blind.

            Thanks again

            1. SHG Post author

              My pleasure and best of luck. We may say mean things about law students, but it’s all for the purpose of trying to help. And we sincerely want you to succeed.

  3. Pingback: Meta: 6003 | Simple Justice

    1. SHG Post author

      Aside from your criticism without having the guts to put your name to it, the book isn’t meant for entitled whiners who lack the initiative to push their way through the difficulties of practice. Given your anon comment and phony email, your comment proves the point.

    2. Pete

      Interesting analysis.
      I perused it, enjoyed it, and have lent it to a friend. It focuses on aspects of practice the profs have either forgotten or (more likely) never learned. While Lee can’t be much older than me, he has a lot of wisdom to share, and it comes from a perspective that is easy for a younger person to empathize with.

      While it is far from “crap”, my only complaint is it has a a fair amount unoriginal content. That being said, what he includes is certainly worthwhile, and I likely would not have encountered it otherwise.

      I think it is a great read for anyone in school who wants to be a real lawyer and serve clients. I’m curious to learn what you disliked, but suspect you are a jaded lover/envious peer/disgruntled client who will not be back to enlighten us.

      1. SHG Post author

        Sorry, but you don’t get to ask anon trolls to enlighten you. It’s my place, so I get to control the content. I have no tolerance for anyone who wants to be critical while hiding under a rock. He can be as critical as he wants, but he will need to use a name and legit email. Cowards don’t get criticize.

        And I might add, while much of the content comes from a variety of source, including here, there is no inherent virtue in recreating the wheel when it’s already been said. Keith’s virtue is recognizing good ideas, and then putting them all together and in a paradigm that makes it easy for new lawyers to read and process. The point isn’t originality, necessarily, but the soundness of the ideas.

        1. Pete

          While it’s my only criticism, it has not prevented me from suggesting it to someone else. I see the merit of your last sentence, and like I said, I would not have encountered the material without reading the book.
          While it doesn’t purport to teach the reader the nuts and bolts of being a lawyer, it certainly shows the prerequisite attitude to be effective.

          1. SHG Post author

            The book was intended to serve a certain audience, one that wasn’t willing to sit around wringing its hands over the lousy lot of new lawyers, and unsure how to make the most of what was available. It wasn’t a nuts and bolts, “how to be a great lawyer overnight,” book. It was a “get off your ass and make the best of what you have” book.

            It was anticipated that the scamblogger types might not take kindly toward it, since it wasn’t all about blaming, but overcoming adversity.

Comments are closed.