The days when a father gave his offspring his first penknife to carry as a tool that will serve her well in life in so many ways are gone. Today, the carried penknife would be the surest route to the penitentiary, for no other reason than its mere possession as a terrorist threat. Were we all potential terrorists, but didn’t know it? It doesn’t matter. That’s the rule now.
But the Garden State, in knee-jerk and premature reaction to the suicide of Tyler Clementi, passed a law. What use is a tragic death without a new law? From the New York Times :
The law, known as the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights, is considered the toughest legislation against bullying in the nation. Propelled by public outcry over the suicide of a Rutgers University freshman, Tyler Clementi, nearly a year ago, it demands that all public schools adopt comprehensive antibullying policies (there are 18 pages of “required components”), increase staff training and adhere to tight deadlines for reporting episodes.
Each school must designate an antibullying specialist to investigate complaints; each district must, in turn, have an antibullying coordinator; and the State Education Department will evaluate every effort, posting grades on its Web site. Superintendents said that educators who failed to comply could lose their licenses.
Schools are now requires to investigate allegations of bullying, even anonymous claims coming through the police-operated “crimestoppers” phone lines. Not surprisingly, the definition, beyond the obvious, is broad:
“Harassment, intimidation or bullying” means any gesture, any written, verbal or physical act, or any electronic communication, whether it be a single incident or a series of incidents, that is reasonably perceived as being motivated either by any actual or perceived characteristic, such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, or a mental, physical or sensory disability, or by any other distinguishing characteristic, that takes place on school property, at any school sponsored function, on a school bus, or off school grounds as provided for in section 16 of P.L.2010, c.122 (C.18A:37-15.3), that substantially disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the school or the rights of other students and that:
a. a reasonable person should know, under the circumstances, will have the effect of physically or emotionally harming a student or damaging the student’s property, or placing a student in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm to his person or damage to his property;
b. has the effect of insulting or demeaning any student or group of students; or
c. creates a hostile educational environment for the student by interfering with a student’s education
In other words, anything that hurts anyone else’s feelings. This isn’t about the lunchline bully any more, but about the new world order where no mean words are ever uttered (or typed, as the case may be).
Caveat: For those who will respond in outrage that I just don’t get it, that they/they’re child has suffered horribly at the hands of bullies who destroyed their lives with invectives and lies, stop. There is bullying, and bullying is bad. Not every mean word is horrible bullying, and not every child who utters a mean word is a criminal who belongs on the bullying registry and should be given life in prison.
New Jersey has managed to find a way to criminalize every child. Admit it or not, kids say mean things sometimes. They do it out of anger and insecurity; they do it because they’re children. We did it. Our children did it. The teacher’s children did it. Tyler Clementi did it. We all do it.
But this law goes so far down the road that even an anonymous allegation will give rise to the demand for an investigation, at the risk of the teacher’s license and the district’s reputation. You can bet your bottom dollar that no teacher is putting their career on the line for your li’l darling. This has the potential to be rife for abuse, not to mention the loss of personal and class time spent in teaching children to “respect” each other and celebrate their differences (upon threat of imprisonment).
Don’t ask me to define what should constitute actionable bullying as opposed to normal child behavior, or bad behavior that was addressed on the school level by attentive and pro-active educators who exercised reasonable discretion in keeping their charges safe. Granted, with the introduction of the internet into the mix, dealing with the school yard tough isn’t sufficient. But distinguishing between conduct that presents a serious threat and conduct that every child, at one point or another, engages in defies legal definition.
What is clear is that defining crime by the way it makes the “victim” feel is a looming disaster. By making “hurt feelings” the dividing line between acceptable and criminal behavior, we turn every child into a victim and every child into a perpetrator. Sure, no parent believes her baby could do such a thing, but the kid not only can, but invariably will, do something that some other kid will feel is hurtful. Just as it happens with adults.
This law, which is the toughest in the nation and may well serve as the model for “save the children” laws elsewhere (since no one wants to have a worse bullying problem than Jersey, of all places), may present one of the worst threats to children ever. As it is applied, as schools are mandated to investigate and “prosecute” bully after bully, as anonymous “tips” are use to get, and get back at, any child who didn’t invite someone to their birthday party or picked them last in gym, we may end up with a state where every child is on the bullying registry. Or in juvenile hall. Or in jail. At least in trouble. How’s that going to look on their college application?
This is not a defense of conduct that physically harms children. Nor is this a defense of harassment that crosses the line of hurt feelings to real harm, whatever that means. This is a call to stop the headlong rush to make every child a criminal in a world where no one’s feelings are every hurt. This is a call to remember the old adage, “sticks and stones can break your bones but words can never harm you.” We need to toughen up to mean words. We need to get over hurt feelings. We need to avoid the creation of a society where every child is a criminal.
This is a defense of children. All of them. They’re all bullies at one time or another. And they’re all victims. But they are not all criminals.
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

“This is a call to remember the old adage, “sticks and stones can break your bones but words can never harm you.” We need to toughen up to mean words. We need to get over hurt feelings. We need to avoid the creation of a society where every child is a criminal.”
Scott, you’re my hero. But what did Governor Christie, alleged conservative, have to say about signing this nightmare of an act?
An excellent question. I haven’t seen anything out of Christie, but he’s a plain talking guy, so I would very much like to hear what he says about this.
When did the definition of “bullying” change from “intimidation by threatened (or actual) physical harm” to “teasing”?
That would be a year after Al Gore invented the internet.
I can recall chasing a bully at school with my pocket knife. He leaped out of a window into the arms of the headmaster who was passing. We were urged to “behave better”.
But that was over 50 years ago.
Never run in the hallways.
This is unwise legislation and a massive over-reaction.
That said, there were a few classmates I would not have been sorry to send to rot in prison for life had the law been in effect back then.
Therein lies the problem – who’s to say those classmates wouldn’t have used this law against you first?
In some cases, bullying really is out of control, especially when it involves sexual orientation. I get that. However, there are already laws that cover it when bullying crosses the line…
I’m young, so it seems kind of silly coming from me, but I think it’s ridiculous that each generation believes more and more that hurting someone’s feelings should be criminally punished. How is the next generation going to deal with the real world?
To put it in a legal context, what are you going to do when the BIGLAW attorney on the other side, with all their BIGLAW staff, files 15 motions? Cry? Call the judge and say it’s unfair? Or are you going to suck it up, respond to the motions, and then use it against the other side? Guess what… you’re a lawyer. Time to be a big boy. If you don’t like all the motion practice, file a motion for sanctions and ask for costs. It’s not the other side’s problem their lawyer has more resources. If you can’t handle the case, you shouldn’t have taken the client. It’s the “adversarial process”.
Today I read an article about college kids who don’t find real careers after they graduate, and you wonder if it’s because many of them simply weren’t raised in an atmosphere indicative of the real world — a place where there aren’t “bully monitors”, and violating social norms often result in career consequences. Sure, you don’t have to cut your hair, you can get those piercings, you don’t have to wear a suit to an interview… but guess what? The employer doesn’t have to hire you because they think you will scare clients.
What’s worse is these schools are supposed to be preparing the youth for their careers and they’re doing the exact opposite — making them less adaptable to the workforce.
It’s a point worth making in many contexts. Years ago, I criticized lawprofs who were scared to tell a student that they were wrong (or worse yet, a blithering idiot) for fear they would cry, run to the dean for a hug and give the prof a bad review. What would happen to these teacups the first time a judge stared down from the bench and yelled “denied”?
We are creating a generation incapable of standing up for itself, handling adversity and overcoming obstacles. While they have to grow up one day, adults have to let them.
Other than a bloody nose, I’m not aware of an effective treatment for bullies. Has someone actually invented something else that works?
Laxative chocolate?
Well, parents are tired of fighting their kids’ battles for them, so they want the schools to take over.
Nobody really wants to take the course that my parents did: deal with it yourself.
Agreed that the law is grossly overbroad, but there is a substantial narrowing requirement that you don’t cite: the insult must substantially disrupt or interfere with the orderly operation of the school or the rights of other students (note the plural). While surely some hypersensitive parents will claim that calling their Jimmy a snotface is bullying, the New Jersey courts have the ability to contract the scope of liability. It’s still an unjustifiable gift to lawyers blessed with loony parental clients.
Those conditions are so broad that you could drive a Mack truck through them.
“In other words, anything that hurts anyone else’s feelings.”
Really? Seems your take is in very much “other words”
What about the words that say “that substantially disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the school or the rights of other students”
Or the part about “AND a reasonable person should know, under the circumstances, will have the effect of physically or emotionally harming a student or damaging the student’s property, or placing a student in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm to his person or damage to his property;
Or the part about the behavior “creates a hostile educational environment for the student by interfering with a student’s education”
In “other words” indeed.
And if you add all those words up, what do you get? Lots of vague words don’t change the meaning. At least not for those who understand the words.
My husband always says the way to handle a bully is bully back. He says all bullies are cowards at heart. I am learning at the young age of 56 to do just that. Surely we can teach our kids the same. I agree we don’t need to criminalize every inappropriate behavior or mistake a person makes. Leave some room for the learning curve to take place.