Demond Wilson played Redd Foxx’s son, Lamont, in Sanford & Son. One line that’s rung in my ears was when Lamont asked, “I read Life Magazine. Do you read Ebony?” It was, of course, a false equivalency, but it made a point, that black people know white culture because it’s the culture of American society.
Whites, however, can happily go through life without ever having to know, or understand, that there is another culture, black culture, that never touches their world. But it surely touches your world if you’re black. Before you start calling me names for saying this, it’s not a political position, but merely descriptive.
It’s one of the first things a criminal defense lawyer comes to realize in order to serve his clients, because cops bust blacks far more than whites, they are our clients, and we need to understand their world to be capable of representing them. Whether we want to or not, we are compelled to see their world in context, as it explains the basics of thought and conduct of our clients. If we don’t know why they do what they do, we can’t help.
Our clients aren’t a race or a culture, but just people. We get to know them as people. Some we like. Some we don’t. Some are smart, funny, the sort of men and women you like to hang out with. Others, not so much. You know, just like real people.*
The Smithsonian has opened its homage to black Americans, officially called the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Unofficially, it’s called the Blacksonian, because the full name is too long and unwieldy, or even the NMAAHC, because it doesn’t roll off the tongue. Frankly, Blacksonian is more witty anyway.
It’s a hot ticket, according to the New York Times.
The wait to create a national museum of black history and culture was decades long. And the result amounts to a major bureaucratic, academic and emotional achievement. Now everybody wants in. So some of us have to wait.
Any time someone has to wait to get into a museum because of its popularity is a good thing. It’s good that people leave their homes on occasion. It’s better still that they do so to learn something. And where better to learn than a museum?
But imagine walking the galleries of the Museum of Modern Art and instead of seeing Picasso’s “Man with Blue Guitar,” you saw a sign describing it and telling you what an important painting it is. What if this was an active decision, that someone decided it was more important to impress upon visitors to MOMA the value of modern art in their lives than to actually see art?
Wesley Morris spends three paragraphs up top of his article on the Blacksonian describing the architecture, the aluminum siding, of the building, with this resplendent description:
In the course of a day, depending on the weather and the light, that aluminum skin turns every shade of that color. In the sunlight, it’s golden, sepia in the shade, red-bone when it’s overcast. At dusk, it’s mahogany and deep chestnut after a cloud gobbles up the sun. The building can be all of these browns without ever getting to black, as if it knows that no black person is actually, phenotypically black. So the building, a mighty, physical construct, memorializes a figurative one. “Black” is the concept that gets unpacked, rebuilt and celebrated within the museum.
It’s moving, beautifully written and yet trivial. This isn’t an architecture lesson, but a review of a museum, and the prime real estate is obsessed with how the sun reflects off the aluminum siding? Could it get more trivial? Yes. Yes it could.
Inside, there’s more waiting to be done — for the very good restaurant, for the ladies’ room, for entry to the museum’s deep lower levels. Building waiting into the experience feels right for a place that tells the story of a people who’ve had to wait for everything else.
Building waiting into the experience of reading about it too, I guess. Because we’re already deep into the review and not yet a word about what the museum offers. Can it possibly be that…bad?
During that wait for the underground galleries, natural impatience threatens to upstage the human majesty of it all. You don’t know why it’s taking so long to get there. Once you reach the entrance, you see. You’re waiting for an elevator. The Blacksonian has one pivotal conceit, one metaphorical device that you need to embrace despite its hokiness, despite its comical proximity to a set of stairs, and it’s the elevator.
The elevator is an enormous glass box that comfortably fits about 30 people. The operator welcomes you to a time machine that’s going to carry you from the 21st century to the 15th. It was a device I knew I’d bought into when the operator asked whether we were ready, and I honestly couldn’t say that I was. Despite waiting all morning for this — despite waiting all my life, really — I was overcome with stress.
The museum has 37,000 artifacts in its collection. What they may be is unclear. These are the things one might suspect the museum to show, but someone decided instead to tell you instead of show you.
The Blacksonian reveals a wicked, poetic sense of humor about this history. You exit that long, tight, airless gallery into a huge open space with virtually no ceiling, and you realize you weren’t breathing. And then you catch your breath only to look up and see, on a platform, a statue of Thomas Jefferson.
Arrayed behind him are rows and rows of bricks painted with the names of some of his slaves — Hercules and Jupiter and lots of Sallys. Surrounding him are equally proportioned statues of Harriet Tubman, Benjamin Banneker, Phyllis Wheatley and the Haitian revolutionary Toussaint Louverture — black people the museum argues are equally important. They loom near Jefferson. They haunt him.
These rows of bricks with painted names make a point, about America, slavery and founding father Thomas Jefferson. But the bricks aren’t artifacts. Somebody bought some bricks and painted a bunch of names on them to make a political point. It’s not that the point isn’t valid or important, but it’s not a painting by Picasso, but a sign telling you how to think about the painting.
We call this place a museum, but to behold its impregnability, to feel centuries of pain and pride, to receive the story of how black people helped forge this nation (first by whip then by will), to find, at the twilight of one historic presidency and the dawn of what promises to be a very different one, that the forging must (must) continue — to see that metal gating reaching up, up, up — is to sense that the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture really should have an additional name, one worthy of all that forging and hammering and ironing out. It should also be called the Blacksmith.
Call it whatever you want, but what it’s not is a museum. The message may be worthy, and maybe it has the artifacts one might hope to see in a museum, the ones that show you instead of tell you, history. It probably could be a museum, maybe a great museum, but when the entirety of its historical collection is glossed over in a paragraph,** then it’s not a museum. Which is unfortunate, as this is a forsaken aspect of American history that should be seen.
Even if it’s fashionable to go to Blacksonian, you still won’t know what’s in the pages of Ebony. Or why a black guy looks at the same thing as a white guy, like, oh, a cop, and sees something very different. Or maybe there is a real museum there, but it wasn’t worth writing about. Wouldn’t that be ironic?
*As opposed to the caricatures or stereotypes that others see when they tell you all about black people. Not that other white people don’t still tell us about black people, because Dunning-Kruger.
**What actual historical artifacts can be found inside Blacksonian?
The time machine transports you to other places — to an old slave cabin, a heartbreakingly perfunctory bill of sale for a black girl, the coffin of young, murdered Emmett Till, to photograph after photograph of slaves who radiate a kind of melancholic neutrality. Encountering so many long faces makes you aware of the length of yours. They also dare you to wonder: Who, among these ancestors, was the first to have the audacity to be pictured with a smile?
Beyond that, who knows?
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Wesley Morris is no Ada Louise Huxtable, or is he is attempting to acquire/attain her mantle? (We suspect he’s read all of her books.) The Blacksonian sounds like another well-intentioned–and expensive–governmental boondoggle. Thanx for sparing us the necessity of visiting and seeing with our own two eyes.
A quick visit to Harlem, Philly’s Northwest corner (a vast ghetto if ever there was one), or Chicago’s south side might be more educational than this new “museum”. Ha.
Maybe the museum has far more to offer than Morris suggests, but a nice dinner on 125th Street may well be more informative and tastier.
If you believe the Senator from Texas or various members of Congress, it appears to be missing some key elements in favor of others. Perhaps someone didn’t note the distinction between museum and political commentary.
Don’t worry though – the only people more suited to designing museums than the NYT’s crowd are on the case.
Political commentary can come from one side or the others. My choice was to let the internal advocacy speak for itself rather than impose external issues, such as the omission of certain significant African-Americans whose politics didn’t conform to those of the internal proponents. And really, who believes Ted Cruz anyway?
To be an employed journalist these days is to be a consummate salesman.
Assuming, arguendo, the Times understands its target audience quite well, why is it pandering to feelz-laden, faux-experience-seeking people who want to believe that someday, they will go to the Blackstonian and have an awesome time (while, if possible, becoming even more enlightened)?
Perhaps the Times’s calling is now to be the coffee table newspaper of record, destined to lie quietly next to paintings of the old masters and occasionally be leafed through by bored hipsters in search of mindless diversion.
If that’s their aspiration, they might or might not take your criticism of an article for wasting time and lacking substance as a solid endorsement, but they’ll almost certainly keep you on the list of people not to hire.
Lucky I didn’t order my liberal limo, NY Times Edition.
Some of us will not fare well in the re-education camps.
On the bright side, at least the re-education camps will be diverse and inclusive.
Do the re-education camps require that one be educated in the first instance? That could be a problem?
Education is a euphemism.
Now the latinos want their own smithsonian museum. And its being considered. No mention of german, irish, or polish however. At what point do we stop fracturing american history into identity groups just because they whine loud enough?
It’s a fair question, but then, no other race was brought here in the holds of ships in shackles and gave as much to the success of a nation while being bought and sold as chattel. There is also a Native American museum, so it’s not as if Blacksonian is the only race/culture centric museum in the Smithsonian.
Others can argue their cause if they like, but they’ll have a rough time comparing their justification to black history.
The Latino and Asian Pacific groups already have such museums. They’re called “cultural centers.” No link (per rules), but check out the Smithsonian page and click on Cultural Centers.
Just why the fuck you chose, or expected, that news paper you read everyday to tap into the Director, Lonnie Bunch’s, and his fathers concept of “gentlemanly defiance” via a few more generations out is beyond me.
https://youtu.be/OIvBf8TXplk
Oh well… seperate but equal as long as it “costs enough” I guess?
Oh yeah, George Michael is dead. I think he is the only white dude to ever to make it to the top of the hip hop charts. Please let there never be another.
I wonder if Lonnie had a chat with the editors at Ebony when he was pondering wheather or not to include some plaque about Clarence Thomas in the museum? I bet he did and it probably went something like this. “If we include Clarence then we will have to include George Michael…”
Just goes to show you black people aren’t stupid, everything is connected, and sooner or later black people are gonna discover punk rock. And when that happens say goodbye to a separate wing at the museum for gangster rap because shits gonna get real when that goes down as long as the editors of Ebony and that newspaper you read everyday don’t fuck it up.
P.S. 125th Street? And here I thought you you only dined at wanna be Michelin stared soul food restaurants or did you get that out of your system in San Francisco when you chickened out with the effort to cross the bridge to Oakland after dark?
Holiday soul food dining could become a cultural “guilt and forgiveness” thing you know. Then again maybe not.
P.S.S. I know a few concierge guys in DC. Unfortunitaly, they aren’t first generation black frenchmen on a work visas, but they are still “black” enough to hook you up with some “artifacts & culture” and even some tickets if that is what you seek.
Thanks, but I know my own concierge guys. Got it covered.
The “Blackstonian”? I’d be more impressed if they’d built it on Whiteacre.
Don’t be ungenerous. The name reflects more wit than most things lately.
a) I can’t think of anything I’d less like to see than a “major bureaucratic, academic and emotional achievement”
b) blacksmiths don’t do any “ironing out.” I realize there’s a metal in the phrase, but that just makes the mixed metaphor suck harder
I’ll probably still check out the museum next time I’m in town, but damn, the New York Times is a national embarrassment.
I didn’t mind the smithy metaphor, but then, I’m not a blacksmith. If I was, I might have been offended at the diminution and lack of respect for my skills and lived experiences.
My grandpa was a blacksmith (among other things). He was well-read and passionately outspoken, yet I’m somehow having trouble picturing him giving a shit about the metaphor. Must be my failing memory.
He was stoic to avoid worrying his grandson. But he was deeply affected by metaphors as he forged ahead.
This is definitely less of a blacksmith and more of a J-school or English teacher microaggression. I bet Gamso’d get heart palpitations.
It was a wroughten metaphor.
It was brazenly tin-eared and not at all chromulent.