Seaton: No NSAC Nannies Needed

Trash talk is a time-honored part of combat sports. From Muhammad Ali’s verbal jabs at his opponents to Dwayne Johnson threatening to send jabronis to the “Smackdown Hotel,”* it’s generally considered a pre-fight ritual. Two guys poised to fight don’t like each other, they say a bunch of nasty stuff about their opponent, and then fans delight as the two slug it out in a ring or a cage.

Nevada, home to many Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) events, apparently thinks it’s time to play nanny to MMA fighters and regulate what can be said before an event.

“I think it’s gotten to the point with certain unarmed combatants to where it’s become totally unacceptable,” said Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) Executive Director Bob Bennett. “I definitely think, unequivocally, that’s something we need to take a more active role in and hold fighters accountable for their language.”

The unarmed combatant Bob’s thinking about is Conor McGregor, a man who takes as much pride in his ability to verbally dress down opponents as he does in actually fighting. He wore a custom suit with the words “Fuck you” printed in stripes to promote a boxing match against Floyd Mayweather. He called Nate Diaz a “broke bitch” who could be bought and sold “a hundred times over.” And Dennis Siver, according to McGregor, is a “midget German steroid-head.”

But none of those can top the war of words between McGregor and his opponent back in November of last year, Khabib Nurmagomendov. During pre-fight exchanges, McGregor called Khabib a “smelly Dagestani rat” and a “backwards cunt.” Conor accused Khabib’s manager, Ali Abedelaziz, of being “a fucking snitch terrorist rat…I don’t even know how that man is in this fucking country.”

McGregor’s verbal jabs had an effect, but not the one Conor intended. After Khabib beat McGregor in their fight, Nurmagomendov jumped the cage and attacked members of McGregor’s team. After security stopped the brawl, Khabib justified his actions by saying Conor “talked about my religion, he talked about my country, he talked about my father.”

The Nevada State Athletic Commission apparently isn’t satisfied with the six-figure fines levied against both fighters for their post-fight antics. Now they’re ready to pursue regulations on what combatants can say to each other before they square off for battle.

The commission members agreed to pursue rule changes to punish this type of fighter speech or what they called “inciting comments,” but realized they weren’t prepared to draft the actual regulations and placed the topic on a list of “items for future agendas.” “[It] would break a lot of precedent and without notice that we’re going to start fining and/or suspending for what you say vs. what you do,” [NSAC Chairman Anthony] Marnell said.

Commission members would be well advised to tread lightly on this issue. It might be best if they just let the matter go. It’s bad enough a state regulatory body is considering policing what athletes can and cannot say. What makes these proposed regulations untenable is the Commission’s arguable attempt to punish the speech of one fighter.

In a sport with countless athletes fully prepared to give pre-packaged statements at press conferences, Conor McGregor stands out in his ability to entertain by roasting his opponents. He’s built a career on getting under his opponents’ skin before the cage door shuts. Punishing McGregor for his pre-fight antics by placing restrictions on what he can and cannot say is the combat sports equivalent of censoring Lenny Bruce.

Plus, if fighters get hurt feels over an opponent’s inflammatory comments, they have the easy recourse of beating the ever-loving hell out of that person come fight night. They get paid to do it and have a license allowing them to commit state-sanctioned assault. Why does the Nevada State Athletic Commission need to play nanny in this scenario?

UFC President Dana White isn’t a fan of the tabled NSAC speech regulations.

“These guys get into a cage and they punch each other in the face. They can knock each other unconscious, they can choke each other, but they can’t say mean things to each other? It’s pretty ridiculous.”

It is ridiculous. State regulatory bodies have no business telling grown men and women what they can and can’t say before an athletic competition. And if the aggrieved parties don’t like it, they can settle the matter in front of a live audience with their fists.

*Before anyone gets on my case about this, yes, professional wrestling is scripted. Batman isn’t a real life superhero either, but most people don’t act like an ass and spend their waking hours pointing that out to people.

15 thoughts on “Seaton: No NSAC Nannies Needed

  1. B. McLeod

    What has been lost in these matches is any notion of sportsmanship or respect for opponents. I will never pay to see a martial arts contestant who comports himself in this disgraceful and undisciplined manner. Whether it is regulated or not, eventually promoters’ economic returns will be impacted. Fans could just as well go to see rabid animals battle.

    Reply
    1. CLS

      I suspect there are many who share your outlook, just as I know there are many who enjoy the verbal antics of guys like Conor McGregor. Whether you find him crass or disgraceful, there’s always going to be a certain group of people who will pay to see McGregor get his ass kicked for running his mouth.

      If more people want class and respect from fighters, there’s plenty of other guys to watch. There’s no need for a state regulatory body to sanction athletes over speech. Let the free market determine whether McGregor remains a cash cow or becomes the foul mouthed persona non grata.

      Reply
  2. Scott Jacobs

    Conor McGregor, a man who takes as much pride in his ability to verbally dress down opponents as he does in actually fighting.

    More, judging by how his last fights have gone.

    Reply
    1. CLS

      None of this has anything to do with a win-loss record. As a couple of luminaries are fond of saying here, “fucking focus!”

      Reply
  3. BCP

    “The commission members agreed to pursue rule changes to punish this type of fighter speech or what they called ‘inciting comments,'”

    This is a good policy. Don’t you know inciting comments could start a fight?!

    Reply
    1. CLS

      I’m pretty sure the point of those “inciting comments” is to encourage a fight, and to incentivize fans to pay exorbitant sums of money for tickets to that fight.

      Reply
  4. wilbur

    I always chuckled at the prefight announcement at wrestling matches that “These matches are sanctioned by the (State name) State Athletic Commission.”

    50 years ago I witnessed a couple of what were billed as world championship matches, held in the Covington, Indiana High School gym. Whooda thunk it?

    The ability to “bring heat” in prematch interviews is what separates the headliners from the ham and eggers. Great fun.

    Reply
    1. CLS

      Wrestling comment aside, you get the point. Guys like Conor McGregor understand how to get heat with a crowd to the point where fans will pay money to see him either win or get his ass kicked.

      That’s what fight promoters want–the guy who will draw enough heat to put butts in seats come fight night. Having a state regulatory body dictate what fighters can and cannot say just hurts promoters’ bottom line, which is why these speech regulations will eventually get a pushback from the affected promotions.

      Reply
  5. Fubar

    The commission members agreed to pursue rule changes to punish this type of fighter speech or what they called “inciting comments,” but realized they weren’t prepared to draft the actual regulations and placed the topic on a list of “items for future agendas.”

    If they ever write regs, the mondagreen defenses write themselves:

    Reply
  6. Pedantic Gramar Police

    Why does the Nevada State Athletic Commission want to involve itself in something that has nothing to do with athletics? What’s next? Are they going to try and stop truck drivers from cursing? The obvious solution is to stop calling entertainment sports.

    Reply
    1. CLS

      I suspect NSAC thinks if they regulate the speech of licensed fighters it will potentially improve the quality of the sportsmanship displayed by various promotions doing business in Nevada, and then somehow add more credibility to a sport once referred to as “human cockfighting.”

      The people in a better position to impose such regulations are the various promotions, like UFC, Bellator, and RISE. And since fight promoters know the previously mentioned “inciting comments” sell tickets, these proposed regulations will (hopefully) remain dead on arrival.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to editing or deletion if I deem them inappropriate for any reason or no reason. Hyperlinks are not permitted in comments and will be deleted. References to Nazis/Hitler will not be tolerated. I allow anonymous comments, but will not tolerate attacks unless you use your real name. Anyone using the phrase "ad hominem" incorrectly will be ridiculed. If you use ALL CAPS for emphasis, I will assume you wear a tin foil hat and treat you accordingly. I expect civility from you, but that does not mean I will respond in kind. This is my home and I make the rules. If you don't like my rules, then don't comment. Spam is absolutely prohibited, and you will be permanently banned.