Short Take: Aunt Becky’s Bad Choice

Dr. SJ was watching the news on CBS, then came in to tell me what just happened on the tube. A former prosecutor just said that it was Lori Loughlin’s fault. The first plea offer is always the best offer, so if you don’t take it, they’re going to add more charges. That’s the price you pay for turning down the deal. She gave me a smirk, as if to say, “See? Even Gayle knows that the truth is you better take the deal or you’re going down.”

And, indeed, that was the message. But it was an acceptable message this time, because everybody knows Aunt Becky was guilty. Loughlin was a pretty good choice of villain, as she was a privileged white celebrity whose crime was to seize opportunity from the deserving by using her wealth and privilege.

But the message? Capitulate to the government when charged with a crime, don’t fight and take the plea they offer, or else. For those who are inclined to believe that anyone charged with a crime is guilty, this message will be uncontroversial.

For those people who think otherwise, does the fact that this was Aunt Becky make the superseding indictment, adding charges of money laundering on top of the original charges as a way to crush her, punish her, pay her back for her failure to genuflect to the might of the government, acceptable? When our willingness to give any thought to the message is constrained by our emotions, how much we love or hate the defendant, then why bother to waste time worrying about the process. This was privileged Lori Loughlin, so who cares what they do to her?

It may be that you’re of the sort who complains about the lack of criminal trials these days. You may blame it  on the trial tax. If you’re somewhat more real about how the system works, you may see that the chance of prevailing at trial is slim at best even for the completely innocent, and Aunt Becky is no innocent because the media told you so.

What about the person indicted who is innocent? What about the person who isn’t quite innocent, but not as guilty as they say? What if the papers and the government are wrong about Aunt Becky? Not possible, you mumble, but you know nothing about the case except what the government told you.

And while you’re ready to take to the streets if the defendant is black and accused of drugs, you’re just as ready to slam the cell door on Lori Loughlin. Hey, she gets what she deserves.

The former prosecutor who “explained” for the benefit of the ignorant masses that if you don’t bend a knee when the government, in its infinite kindness, gives you a chance to forfeit your constitutional right to challenge their accusations and accept the possibility of probation, then you deserve 121 months in prison for your arrogance, was right.

That is, indeed, the game the government plays, because it can. There are charges upon charges they can throw at you, and with some deft choices, they can make your choice gravely painful. The former prosecutor wasn’t lying. She wasn’t misleading the viewer. But what she was saying was presented not as one of the many fundamental flaws in the system, designed to coerce guilty pleas from the guilty and innocent alike, but a masterstroke of the government in taking the privileged down and making them pay for their arrogance.

Except it takes everyone down the same way as Aunt Becky. Nobody on the television raised the point that if it works this way for Lori Loughlin, it works this way for defendants you don’t despise as well. It works this way for you. Our capacity for accepting the improprieties of the system when its victim is someone for whom we shed no tears, without grasping that the same system does its voodoo when the accused isn’t some awful Aunt Becky, or maybe isn’t even guilty, is at once astounding and unsurprising.

Sure, we learn from a former prosecutor on CBS. Take the first plea offer or get crushed by the superseding indictment. Your choices are plead guilty and take the punishment, or be convicted and take even more punishment. That’s the lesson. Learn it good.

 

 

16 thoughts on “Short Take: Aunt Becky’s Bad Choice

  1. B. McLeod

    Maybe Aunt Becky can find somebody even worse to throw under the bus. After all, that is how this whole thing with the university admissions-fixing got launched to begin with.

    Reply
  2. Curtis

    I find it refreshing that this is spoken on national TV because it helps educate the public about the way prosecutors act. Whenever a trial comes up in work conversation, my fellow engineers are totally ignorant that this occurs. I find myself being the almost blind leading the blind in legal issues.

    Reply
    1. SHG Post author

      Plead out or be crushed? It’s not the fact of what’s happening that presents a problem, but the takeaway at the hands of the “experts.”

      Reply
  3. Anonymous Coward

    As a long time reader of SJ and Popehat, if the Feds come after me I know l should seek advice of counsel and follow it.

    Reply
    1. Skink

      Read deeper. You missed a step: hire the right lawyer. There are a million of us, we don’t know everything.

      Reply
      1. LocoYokel

        But that’s the hard part. So many of the wrong lawyers will not admit to being the wrong one and passing up a paying client. And lawyer referral services are even worse.

        Just hire a travel agent and move to a non-extradition country.

        Reply
        1. SHG Post author

          In past posts, I’ve explained how best to find the right lawyer for the job, even if you never read the posts. But had you read them, you wouldn’t have felt compelled to write this comment and sully my blawg with such crap. Remember, SJ existed before you got here. You might want to check first, comment later, and save us both from writing a needless comment.

          Reply
  4. Ross

    And now, Loughlin is quoted as saying she thought the “DA” was bluffing, and in hindsight, might have considered the original plea offer. Either she didn’t listen to her attorney about the seriousness of the charges, or the attorney is not a good one. As an actress, she makes a lousy attorney.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to editing or deletion if I deem them inappropriate for any reason or no reason. Hyperlinks are not permitted in comments and will be deleted. References to Nazis/Hitler will not be tolerated. I allow anonymous comments, but will not tolerate attacks unless you use your real name. Anyone using the phrase "ad hominem" incorrectly will be ridiculed. If you use ALL CAPS for emphasis, I will assume you wear a tin foil hat and treat you accordingly. I expect civility from you, but that does not mean I will respond in kind. This is my home and I make the rules. If you don't like my rules, then don't comment. Spam is absolutely prohibited, and you will be permanently banned.