In a curious and troubling decision, the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals holding that its state revenge porn statute, which as such statutes go is at least fairly well circumscribed and limited so that some of the worst excesses are avoided.
617.261 NONCONSENSUAL DISSEMINATION OF PRIVATE SEXUAL IMAGES.
It is a crime to intentionally disseminate an image of another person who is depicted in a sexual act or whose intimate parts are exposed, in whole or in part, when:
(1) the person is identifiable: Continue reading
