By all accounts, Jen Angel was as sincerely devoted to her progressive beliefs as anyone could be. It didn’t prevent her murder.

Angel was running errands for her business on Monday, including a stop at the Wells Fargo branch near Webster and 21st streets, her fiance, Ocean Mottley, told the San Francisco Chronicle. According to a spokesperson with the Oakland Police Department, around 12:30 that afternoon, “an individual broke into” Angel’s car while she was in it and stole an item from her, then ran back “to a waiting vehicle.” Continue reading →

Who’s responsible for the success of professional wrestling? Is it “Stone Cold” Steve Austin? Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson? Or is it someone like Terry “Hulk Hogan” Bollea?

Friends, I submit to you the guy most responsible for keeping professional wrestling alive is none other than “Mr. Wrestling,” Tim Woods. What he did back in the 1970s not only kept a major promotion alive, it cemented in the minds of fans that “kayfabe,” or the notion that wrestling was a legitimate sport, was something in which they could place their trust. Continue reading →

For some, the now-ubiquitous word “disproportionate” has inexplicably morphed into majority, as in the police disproportionately kill black men when the reality is that the majority of people killed by police are white men, but the percentage of black men killed is greater than the percentage of black men in the general population.

The concept, but not the word, popped up again in an interesting New York Times column by Bret Stephens about an op-ed by Leonard Downie Jr., a former executive editor of The Washington Post, arguing that objectivity in media needs to die. Continue reading →

As army artificial intelligence burst onto the public radar with both written words and images, the initial reaction was largely curiosity and amusement. Some have tried to trick chatbots to see what it will get wrong. Others have created “art” that never existed, assuming you don’t consider DALL E an artist. But what about law? Sure, there was the stunt by DONOTPAY to offer $1,000,000 to let its AI bot argue a Supreme Court case, or for no money, a traffic court case, whichever came first. But that was just goofy and unserious.

At the same time, others are creating more serious applications for AI that raise new, yet old, concerns about the damage it can cause. Continue reading →

Contrary to what some have asserted on social media, it’s not quite a done deal, as the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Sharpe v. Winterville Police Dep’t neither affirmatively held that the livestreaming by a passenger in a traffic stop was definitely protected by the First Amendment, nor foreclosed the possibility that on a different record, the claim of officer safety wouldn’t be sufficiently established to overcome strict scrutiny. But at least, for the moment, the court held that in in the absence of such a showing, there was a First Amendment right to do so.

This case asks whether a town’s alleged policy that bans video livestreaming certain
interactions with law enforcement violates the First Amendment. It also asks whether a
police officer who, during a traffic stop, attempted to stop a passenger from livestreaming
the encounter may be successfully sued under § 1983 for violating the passenger’s First
Amendment rights. Continue reading →

In reaction to the “mostly peaceful” protests of 2020, the City of Atlanta decided to build a police training facility on an 85 acre tract of land, which included a mock city. Protesters of what they dubbed “Cop City,” who called themselves “forest defenders,” have taken to the woods to fight against the initiative.

Protesters, many of whom are college students and or from out of state, have set up camps throughout the 300-acre Weelaunee Forest, as the land was called by its original inhabitants from the Muscogee Nation before serving as a plantation site during the Civil War and later as a prison farm until 1990. They’ve even constructed treehouses and set up barricades in an effort to halt the construction process. Continue reading →

It’s a curious path from the National Review to the New York Times, given the ouster of James Bennett, the long time editorial page editor, following the Times’ publication of Senator Tom Cotton’s op-ed. Then there was Bari Weiss’ quitting in the face of unwelcoming colleagues who characterized her as a liar and bigot. Yet, here we are, with former NRO writer David French making his debut as a New York Times columnist.

Before I go further, let me put my own partisan cards on the table. I’m a conservative independent. I left the Republican Party in 2016, not because I abandoned my conservatism but rather because I applied it. A party helmed by Donald Trump no longer reflected either the character or the ideology of the conservatism I believed in, and when push came to shove, I was more conservative than I was Republican.

Continue reading →

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis argued that the reason Florida rejected the Advance Placement course in African American History is that it lacked “educational value.” It’s not that units one through three lacked educational value, but that unit four introduced such things as black queer theory and critical race theory, which, per DeSantis, violated Florida’s unconstitutional Stop WOKE law.

If changes were not made to the AP course, the course would not be allowed in Florida’s schools. The College Board subsequently changed the curriculum of a course that never before existed. A glittering party was held at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture to celebrate the introduction of the course. Mara Gay was there to enjoy the jazz and collard greens. Continue reading →

Prefatory Note: For those of you who might be new around here, I’ve got a hacker contact that sends me regular batches of emails Sheriff Roy composes on his office computer.

The Sheriff’s got lousy cybersecurity. Anyway, enjoy a look at what’s been on his mind this year!—CLS

January 1, 2023
FROM: Templeton, Roy ([email protected])
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
SUBJECT: New Year’s Vision Board Issue Continue reading →

Does it fall under the “woke” heading? Who knows, but the correlation seems clear. The nonsensical reimagination of language to eliminate “hurtful” words and phrases and replace them with more sensitive words remains very much alive. In the desperation to find ever more signifiers of empathy, no matter how ridiculous it may be to believe that it makes any  substantive difference other than to signal one’s virtue to the world that one is attuned to the language of the woke, lists continue to be pushed upon others as to what they should no longer say. Continue reading →