Among his other duties, Zach Greenberg gives presentations for FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which has its offices in Philadelphia for reasons that elude me. In giving presentations, he might have to say some “bad” words to make his point. Except the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted a version of the ABA’s model rule 8.4(g) to dictate that lawyer speech and conduct be sufficiently woke to avoid disbarment.
Plaintiff alleged specific examples of individuals filing disciplinary and Title IX complaints against speakers who were presenting on similar topics as those discussed by Plaintiff, which he alleges will “force[ him] to censor himself to steer clear of an ultimately unknown line so that his speech is not at risk of being incorrectly perceived as manifesting bias or prejudice.” Therefore, in addition to showing that the “chilling effect on his speech … is objectively reasonable,” Plaintiff has shown that he will “self-censor[] as a result.”
