As Cristian Farias ably notes, the errant paragraph of Justice Scalia’s Heller opinion holds the door open to, well, wild interpretation. And as Cristian further ably notes, the errant paragraph means that there is no need to repeal the Second Amendment, no matter how many youngsters take to the street or how much David Hogg, et al., are enjoying their 15 minutes of fame.
In a passage that has become a thorn in the side of gun-rights enthusiasts, Scalia warned that people shouldn’t read too much into the fundamental right that he had just helped announce. Among other caveats and restrictions, Scalia wrote, “long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms” were still fair game.
There are two rather huge holes in this paragraph, the first being that Scalia offers no principled basis for it, in contrast with the rest of the decision holding the Second Amendment to be a fundamental individual right. It’s assumed to be a compromise, to soften the blow of the holding by not undoing the entire regulatory scheme for firearms. Continue reading

