We teach our children to study hard, do well, get into a good college and become whatever they dream of becoming. We teach them that if they follow the path, there will be a pot of gold at the end. And statistically, that’s generally true. with a long list of caveats. So why are there so many radicalized, angry, miserable Ph.D.s out there?
In August, Michael Isaacson, an adjunct instructor of economics at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, wrote on Twitter, “Some of y’all might think it sucks being an anti-fascist teaching at John Jay College but I think it’s a privilege to teach future dead cops.” Though he later said he was not wishing for his students’ deaths, but merely predicting some would die, his post was roundly condemned. He received death threats and was suspended from his job, ostensibly in the interest of campus safety.
There have been similar cases in recent weeks. A sociologist holding a temporary position at the University of Tampa was fired after tweeting that Hurricane Harvey was karmic payback for Republican-voting Texans. Officials at California State University, Fresno, dismissed a history lecturerfor tweeting that “Trump must hang.” And an adjunct instructor in gender studies — who had already been fired from Rutgers — lost his fall employment offer from Montclair State University after the revelation that he’d tweeted about his wish to see President Trump shot.
This gives a somewhat false impression. It’s not that these aren’t accurate examples, but a few anecdotes don’t make for pervasive craziness. According to Colby College sociology prof, Neil Gross, these examples share one common theme, they’re all adjuncts. Continue reading


