George Floyd was needlessly killed by a cop. He wasn’t the first black man to be murdered. He won’t be the last. But George Floyd was no saint, hero or martyr. He was just a troubled man with a troubled history who ended up dead on video at the moment in time when he caused a nation to explode. Before he died, very few knew or cared about George Floyd at all. Afterward, he was the center of the social justice universe.

Charlie Kirk was nothing like George Floyd. His assassination was nothing like George Floyd’s murder. But like George Floyd, his death is being seized upon as a justification for retribution against the “radical left,” as Trump called it, as an existential battle between the right and left. Continue reading →

Prefatory note: I’m currently gutted as I write this after the senseless assassination of Charlie Kirk. Apologies for moving back to the well of college football two weeks in a row but I need to take my mind off this shit. Hopefully this helps you too.—CLS

It’s time to see what the Vols can really do this season.

Beating Syracuse in week one at Atlanta was a great start. Week two’s record scoring win over East Tennessee State at Neyland Stadium was a nice preview of what the Volunteers can do when all cylinders are mostly clicking.

Now comes the big test as Georgia makes a season-early trip to Knoxville. Continue reading →

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, FIRE, just released its 2026 College Free Speech Rankings. The message is not good. In fact, it’s bad. But among the bad news is the terrible news that “a record 1 in 3 students now holds some level of acceptance – even if only ‘rarely’ — for resorting to violence to stop a campus speech.” For years, FIRE, and I, have tried to argue that violence is never an acceptable response to speech. It hasn’t gone well.

“More students than ever think violence and chaos are acceptable alternatives to peaceful protest,” said FIRE Chief Research Advisor Sean Stevens. “This finding cuts across partisan lines. It is not a liberal or conservative problem — it’s an American problem. Students see speech that they oppose as threatening, and their overblown response contributes to a volatile political climate.”

The day after FIRE released its ranking, Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University. Continue reading →

For many, today will be consumed with the news of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. For me, I’ve not yet forgotten the day when two planes flew into the Twin Towers, but I cannot ignore the circumstances of the moment and see a connection between the radical jihadists who struck America and the Americans striking ourselves in acts of hatred and political violence.

The shooter remains at large, despite our FBI director twice saying he was in custody before knowing whether it was correct, and being compelled to twice back down from his impetuous claims. We don’t know for sure who committed the assassination or why. We can certainly make assumptions, but we don’t actually know. Not that the president let that slow his roll. Continue reading →

I remember well the telephone call Dr. SJ received from her mother, informing her that mom finally knew what her ailments were. Mom, whose maiden name should have been Munchausen, had, she stated with absolute confidence, irritable bowel syndrome and restless legs syndrome. How did she arrive at these diagnoses? Not because any physician said so. Oh no. She knew it because she saw it on a television commercial.

When Dr. SJ suggested that it wasn’t her bowels that were irritable, Mom was miffed. When Dr. SJ urged her to get off her butt and her legs wouldn’t be so restless, Mom was outraged. So what if few, if anyone, knew that these syndromes existed. The TV said there were cures and she was going to the doctors to demand the drugs she saw on the TV commercials. And eventually, her doctor agreed to prescribe the drugs for her just to stop her complaining. That was the affect of television advertising of direct-to-consumer drugs, mostly directed toward older Americans who were more inclined to be susceptible to its influence. Continue reading →

In yet another shadow docket ruling without rationale, the Supreme Court stayed the injunction from the LA District Court against ICE rounding up random Hispanics who are now presumed to be illegal immigrants until they can prove otherwise to the satisfaction of masked agents.

Concurring, Justice Brett Kavanaugh explains his joining the 6-3 majority, noting that ethnicity alone is not enough. But add in other benign factors that typically go hand in hand with ethnicity and its close enough for reasonable suspicion.

Here, those circumstances include: that there is an extremely high number and percentage of illegal immigrants in the Los Angeles area; that those individuals tend to gather in certain locations to seek daily work; that those individuals often work in certain kinds of jobs, such as day labor, landscaping, agriculture, and construction, that do not require paperwork and are therefore especially attractive to illegal immigrants; and that many of those illegally in the Los Angeles area come from Mexico or Central America and do not speak much English. Cf. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U. S., at 884–885 (listing “[a]ny number of factors” that contribute to reasonable suspicion of illegal presence). To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court’s case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a “relevant factor” when considered along with other salient factors.

Continue reading →

One of the many inexplicably bizarre acts of the Trump administration was the firing of Immigration Judges, given that his push to deport requires enough immigration judges to issue orders of removal. They’re administrative judges, working under the Department of Punishment Justice, which has little tolerance for judges who do their job and refuse to rubber stamp removals with either the speed or reliability demanded of them. And yet, they still need the warm bodies to do as they’re told and wield the stamp. What to do?

Why not deploy JAGs in their place?

Military lawyers,  JAGs for Judge Advocate General, are some of the finest lawyers around, both in terms of competence and integrity. Their mission is to administer the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a parallel legal system to address the conduct of members of the military. What they neither do nor know is immigration law. It isn’t their gig and they never signed up to be immigration lawyers or judges. But hey. they exist, they’re on the payroll and Trump needs someone to follow orders and sign off on removal orders. So why not? Continue reading →

Remember when the president responded to the public’s overwhelming clarion call to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico? And with the stroke of a Sharpie, he did, changing the trajectory of the future from lowly Mexico (boo) to bigly America (YAY!)? Well, President Donald J. Trump just did it again

Section 1.  Purpose.  On August 7, 1789, 236 years ago, President George Washington signed into law a bill establishing the United States Department of War to oversee the operation and maintenance of military and naval affairs.  It was under this name that the Department of War, along with the later formed Department of the Navy, won the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II, inspiring awe and confidence in our Nation’s military, and ensuring freedom and prosperity for all Americans.  The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world.  The name “Department of War,” more than the current “Department of Defense,” ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend.  This name sharpens the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what is ours.  I have therefore determined that this Department should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War.

Continue reading →

I don’t think it’s much of a secret that college football fans can be petty as all get out.

Of all the fanbases in the sport, probably the pettiest fans are those of the Tennessee Volunteers. Hey, I should know—I’m a proud resident of Rocky Top. Our fans started a Twitter shitstorm that cost a coach his job before the ink was dry on the page once, and we consider any betrayal of the Power T an egregious moral offense.

So last Saturday, you can imagine I was nervous when noon rolled around and Joey Aguilar, our new star quarterback, took the field for the first time since Josh Heupel essentially traded with UCLA, sending our former golden boy Nico Iamaleava back to California. I knew our guys could handle Syracuse but those 24 interceptions at Appalachian State didn’t look good. Continue reading →

My dear friend, Judge Richard Kopf, had a problem. Whether he agreed with the Supreme Court or not on any given case, he understood it was his obligation as a district court judge to follow its precedent. After all, they were Supremes and he was . . . not. But how, he complained, was he supposed to follow its precedent when it failed to provide either a rule or a coherent rationale that told district judges what to do in order to comply? Even when SCOTUS tried to explain itself, he found the explanations unhelpful and frequently impossible to apply to real cases in real district courts in the real world.

His take was that the Supreme Court was too absorbed by impractical ideology, deliberately vague to cover its butt, and lacked a functional understanding of what trial court judges did in the trenches. Continue reading →