It’s no crime to be poor. Why then are poor people held in jail because of it? Maurice Walker was held for six days because he couldn’t pay the $160 required by a bail schedule for being a pedestrian under the influence of alcohol. The City of Calhoun, Georgia, used a bail schedule imposed by its municipal court which based release on the amount of the fine plus costs. It made inadequate accommodation for whether the person in custody had the wherewithal to pay.*
The use of bail schedules has its putative virtues. It’s clear, easily applied, gets people out of jail quickly and applies equally to everyone. It also has its issues, foremost of which is that it bears no cognizable connection to the individual in jail. Why does he need bail at all? Does he have the ability to pay bail? The offense of arrest may be the same, but the person arrested isn’t. If you can’t pay the bail, you sit for no better reason than you can’t pay the bail.
In the first round of litigation in the district court, an injunction issued creating a three-tier system. An arrestee could be released by paying bail according to a Standing Bail Order, or be brought before a judge within 48 hours, or, if only charged with a local violation, released on unsecured bail. The Eleventh Circuit rejected the scheme as insufficiently specific. Continue reading
