Seaton: The Friday Funny Christmas Letter

Happy Friday everyone! It’s time for the annual Friday Funny Christmas Letter, my musical holiday interlude for you all. Per usual, I’m accompanied by the incomparable Tom Lehrer. Could you please get us started, Tom?

Christmas time is here by golly, disapproval would be folly,
Deck the halls with hunks of holly, fill the cup and don’t say when!

I like celebrating holidays at their own times during the year and their own pace. In my house Christmas officially begins when Santa makes his Macy’s Parade appearance. After that we get to put up decorations and so on. Continue reading

The “Piling On” Of Luigi Mangione

I have little sympathy for the murderer of United Healthcare CEO, Brian Thompson. It has nothing to do with my views about healthcare, but with my views about murder. But as despicable an act as it was, the subsequent “piling on” is deeply concerning and, in all likelihood, problematic as well. The feds just couldn’t keep their nose out of it? New York County district attorney Bragg had to up the ante with a first degree murder charge by making it about terrorism rather than a second degree charge for the murder itself?

Was it not sufficient that a murder be prosecuted in the usual jurisdiction under the usual charge? Continue reading

The Kennedy Mystique

I remember a kid in my grade school class who constantly got in trouble, disrupted class and failed to do his work. But he was actually quite smart. It made no sense to us at the time, why he was so scattered and incapable of focusing on the work at hand. Of course, we had no diagnoses at the time like ADHD or autism.

We had good students and bad students, and because they made teachers’ lives difficult, they were bad students. We all thought so because we didn’t know any better. I often wonder what became of him, whether he ever found help that enabled him to be the smart person he was without the troubled person he was known to be.

It wasn’t fair, but that’s what it was and nobody knew any differently back then. We know better today. At least we did. Continue reading

The End Of An ERA, No Matter What Biden Does

No matter how many times it’s died, some people won’t let go of the Equal Rights Amendment. Having explained why it’s dead, and dead, and dead, before, even though I supported its adoption back in the good old days when there was still a possibility of ratification, there is no reason to explain it again. And yet, that didn’t stop the New York Times from including New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand’s, disdain for democracy in its end of Biden’s presidency wish list.

Fortunately, Mr. Biden has the power to enshrine reproductive rights in the Constitution right now. He can direct the national archivist to certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment. This would mean that the amendment has been officially ratified and that the archivist has declared it part of the Constitution.

Continue reading

Tuesday Talk*: Why Did ABC Settle?

Given the controversial redefinitions of rape raised here over the past decade, the use of the word by George Stephanopoulos didn’t come anywhere near the fringes. Not that Trump cared.

Mr. Trump sued ABC and Mr. Stephanopoulos in March, after the anchor asked Representative Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina, who has spoken publicly about being raped as a teenager, why she had continued to support Mr. Trump after he was found “liable for rape” in a 2023 civil case in Manhattan.

In that case, a federal jury found Mr. Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll, but it did not find him liable for rape. Still, the judge who oversaw the proceeding later clarified that because of New York’s narrow legal definition of rape, the jury’s verdict did not mean that Ms. Carroll had “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” Continue reading

A Penny For Your Thoughts

I was fairly certain that after the jury hung on the top count of Manslaughter 2, and Justice Max Wiley agreed to dismiss the count with prejudice at the prosecution’s request, Daniel Penny was looking at a conviction on the lesser account of criminally negligent homicide as a compromise verdict. After all, there was at least one, if not more, jurors ready to convict on the top count, and jurors get tired after a while and tend to accommodate the strongly held positions of their fellow jurors so they can reach a verdict and go home.

I was wrong. The jury acquitted and courtroom burst into chaos. Continue reading

Cruisin’

Dr. SJ informs me that we, meaning she, needs a little warm weather break, so we’re off to a Caribbean cruise. See you back here in about a week or so. Maybe. Have fun and be kind to each other.

Seaton: Unsolicited Opinions (Yule Edition)

It’s almost the end of the year and I’ve not done an Unsolicited Opinions in a long time. Fortunately, my brain’s bouncing all over the place and I’m ready to share a few takes on things on which no one’s asked me to opine.

Allow me to rectify that!

As longtime readers will know by now, what follows are unsolicited opinions no one’s asked for from a self-identified middle-aged crazy man on the internet. No one should take any of the following seriously. Unless, of course, you agree with me. Continue reading

Murderers Are Not Heroes

Is there any doubt that the targeted assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was wrong and tragic? It’s almost inconceivable that a cold-blooded murder, caught on video for all to see, would be anything but. And yet, the very online left fringe sees the murderer as a hero and the murder as an act of bravery against an evil billion dollar business that makes its money by denying health care to those who need and deserve it, causing the deaths of many.

“How could people be so mad at a guy that runs the biggest insurance corporation that makes billions of dollars by denying claims for basic healthcare at the highest rate of any company?” Yea is a real head scratcher

Continue reading

Pardoning Enemies Without Crimes

Some would suggest it’s pretty foolish to publish an “enemies list” of those you would target for prosecution if you had the power to do so. Others would call it far worse. So, naturally, that’s what Kash Patel did, because that’s what Kash Patel is.

And that’s just the start of it, Patel having already expressed his desire to target journalists who said mean things about his beloved. Continue reading