Before we get to what Bill Marler did, let’s dispense with the haters.
Point: He must have made a bundle off the case, an obscene amount of money, so it was no big deal.So what? If he made a bundle, it’s because he earned a bundle, and in this nation, you are allowed to eat what you catch. We are a capitalist society and we do not frown upon profit. In fact, it’s no crime to take your profit and put it in your pocket, buy a Ferrari, or just lie naked in a bath tub filled with greenbacks. Welcome to America. But Bill chose not to do so.
Point: It’s great advertising, and this will come back to him in spades.
So what? Should it turn out that others think well of Bill for what he’s done, and that translates into more business and more money, is that somehow a reason to do otherwise? That our acts of kindness or good behavior or generosity happens to have the collateral benefit of making others appreciate us, it by no means diminishes the act itself.
And what did Bill Marler do that would give rise to such resentment? He did good, that’s what. From Food Safety News :

When Nevada’s Green Valley High School held its winter sports award banquet last week, Seattle-based food safety law firm Marler Clark was there to announce a donation of $100,000 to the Henderson-based school.The donation was made in honor of Green Valley’s former teaching assistant, E. coli victim Linda Rivera, and her family.Marler Clark managing partner Bill Marler, who represents Rivera, said the donation to the school will provide science scholarships and help fund the wrestling program and special education.“I am extremely proud to be part of such an event and, even more so, honored to work with a family as courageous as the Riveras,” said Marler. “Linda’s battle with E. coli has certainly been one of the most devastating I’ve ever witnessed in my nearly 20 years of foodborne illness litigation and I know the Riveras are simply overjoyed to see something positive come from this experience.”
There is no reason in the world that Bill and his firm couldn’t have taken this $100 grand and plowed it into SEO, even a cool TV commercial with some unctuous actor looking doe-eyed into the camera and asking, “did your broccoli make you puke?” If this was about marketing and advertising, there would be no shortage of people claiming to be “professionals” who would have butchered the mother-tongue to prove how badly they wanted it.
But Bill chose instead to donate it to his client’s school, the place where people cared about her, where her children were comforted and where a small community stood behind his client in her time of need. What a terrible thing to do, help a family, a school and a community. Such a Machiavellian ploy.
Outside the world of foodborne illness litigation and a small town in Nevada, few will know of Bill’s donation. It’s not like that Facebook kid threw pocket change at Newark, New Jersey. He’s filthy rich. Bill Marler is just a working lawyer. You should know, however, about this.
Want to let your community know you exist? You could send a check to Bangalore for misspelled SEO juice, or some fast-talking snake oil salesman who will teach you how to become a twitter guru. If you really want to all in, get the full team, from graphic artist for your critically acclaimed logo which can then be plastered on informercials night after night. Is there a niche practice for the sleep-deprived?
Or you can use whatever money you would otherwise piss away on nonsense for the good of someone else. Fund a scholarship. Or a soup kitchen. There are no shortage of opportunities in every community to help. And if you happen to also get some gain for yourself out of it, whatever.
People have plenty of bad things to say about lawyers, most of them well-earned. Some may feel compelled to project their own evil thoughts onto Bill Marler. The point is that regardless of whether there was any thought of gain from an act of generosity in no way makes the gift of Marler Clark less beneficial to that school, to those children and to that community.
Think what you want. Bill Marler did good, and he deserves every bit of recognition he gets for this act of generosity. And if you’re jealous of the kind words, do something good yourself.
H/T Kevin O’Keefe
Discover more from Simple Justice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Scott – thanks. For those that know me, they know the passion that I bring to my job, and that it is not just about the money. I have been successful enough that I can give gifts like this, and it is an honor to do so.
The honor is mine to spread the word. The people who know you won’t project their jealousy, but those entitled, myopic narcissists will hate because your generosity shines a spotlight on their selfishness. Your act highlights two separate and critically important things, that lawyers can be good people, and that no one should ignore the karma aspect, that success comes to those who help others.
And much as I hate to blow the horn too hard, this isn’t your first time.
“If he made a bundle, it’s because he earned a bundle, and in this nation, you are allowed to eat what you catch. We are a capitalist society and we do not frown upon profit.”
What a sudden change of heart from your 4th of July post. When it comes to Marler’s good deeds, you believe we should disregard his economic interests since any collateral benefit ‘by no means diminishes the act itself’.
That certainly doesn’t sound like your take on the economic interests of the Founding Fathers, which were purely sinister and associated with dirty deeds. You wrote, they “were smart enough to couch their rhetoric in liberty and freedom, because they foresaw that ‘a decent return on equity’ wouldn’t fit on license plates.”
I understand that rhetoric is part of your job. You have a duty to argue for things you may not agree with, and to do it with the same passion and conviction either way.
But when you’re not representing a client and you bring the same kind of rhetoric to your personal communications, it makes me wonder just what the hell you actually believe in anyway.
Is there a human behind that lawyer?
While I bet Bill won’t mind being compared with our founding fathers, I don’t think there is an inconsistency here. Our founding fathers are ascribed the highest and purest of motives by a thankful nation, paragons of virtue all, almost god-like in their perfection. Except it wasn’t true.
Guys like Bill aren’t handed those virtues by jealous cynics so easily, but rather ascribed less pure motives for their acts of kindness and generosity.
My descriptions seek to bring both closer to reality, as opposed to the pendulum swinging far too much toward pure motives for the founding fathers and toward cynical motives for Bill Marler.
It’s not that your intentions are inconsistent, but the way you present them feels like an episode of…
Blaw & Order
[cue music]
In the Adversarial Blogging System one man’s thoughts are represented by two separate, yet equally important personalities. Scott the prosecutor, and Scott the advocate of liberty. These are their stories.
One of the harsh realizations of blawging is that you can’t please all the people all the time. I’m just gonna have to live with this.